[Bug 240955] Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook?

2019-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240955 Jason Helfman changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|d...@freebsd.org |j...@freebsd.org

[Bug 240955] Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook?

2019-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240955 --- Comment #1 from PauAmma --- Meanwhile, it was fixed following my earlier email to freebsd-doc@. (See https://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc?view=revision=53449.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

Re: Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook?

2019-10-02 Thread jgh
On 2019-09-18 09:07, Pau Amma wrote: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-gnome.html (in 6.10.1. Introduction) contains a mention of adding DEVELOPER=yes to /etc/make.conf that to me looks out of place and redundant with that in section 3,

[Bug 240955] Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook?

2019-09-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240955 Bug ID: 240955 Summary: Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook? Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware:

Mention of DEVELOPER=yes out of place/redundant in section 6.10.1 of the Porter's Handbook?

2019-09-18 Thread Pau Amma
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-gnome.html (in 6.10.1. Introduction) contains a mention of adding DEVELOPER=yes to /etc/make.conf that to me looks out of place and redundant with that in section 3,