Re: Annotation for doc review

2014-07-10 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Warren Block wrote: We've talked before about having periodic reviews of parts of the documentation. It turns out that experts rarely read the docs on things they know about, but are the ones that can produce very valuable feedback. Ideally, we'd be able to show a

Re: Annotation for doc review

2014-07-10 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:49:26AM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote: PostgreSQL used to have a facility to comment directly on the web page, though they seem to have instead moved to a forum approach. Please, no. Glen pgpka7Bo6CNyJ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Annotation for doc review

2014-07-10 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Glen Barber wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:49:26AM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote: PostgreSQL used to have a facility to comment directly on the web page, though they seem to have instead moved to a forum approach. Please, no. To which half? G

Re: Annotation for doc review

2014-07-10 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:15:36PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Glen Barber wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:49:26AM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote: PostgreSQL used to have a facility to comment directly on the web page, though they seem to have instead moved to a

Re: Annotation for doc review

2014-07-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, July 04, 2014 4:54:42 pm Warren Block wrote: The phabricator instance has shown that some review can be done more easily. We've talked before about having periodic reviews of parts of the documentation. It turns out that experts rarely read the docs on things they know about,