[Bug 227130] lang/rust: Update to 1.25

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227130

--- Comment #24 from Jean-Sébastien Pédron  ---
The aarch64 bootstraps were uploaded to `LOCAL/dumbbell`. bdrewery, could you
please update the `distinfo` in your patch and possibly commit it?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gecko
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gecko-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: www/firefox-esr build dependencies

[Jan Beich]

"14th.presid...@gmail.com" <14th.presid...@gmail.com> writes:

> Greetings,
>
> I just got bit by having SECURE_DELETE turned off in
> databases/sqlite3, in that firefox failed the configure stage
> but only after a couple of hours of building other stuff had
> transpired.  I assume this applies equally to the other
> firefox ports, and probably seamonkey, as well.

SECURE_DELETE is documented by 20120726 in /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Properly fixing would require the ports framework to support
a way to specify dependencies with options, similar to flavors.

> I know that other ports have checks to make sure that
> certain flags are turned on in dependencies before
> trying to build, but I'm not sure how much of a headache
> that would be.

Those hacks tend to bitrot or grow out of sync over time e.g.,
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/402343

There're not enough gecko@ peers to maintain existing hacks, so I'm not
enthused to add more for marginal benefit. After binary packages became
stable regular users shouldn't be using ports and power users should be
experienced enough to route around quirks.

If you feel strongly power up more and submit a patch. ;)
___
freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gecko
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gecko-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

www/firefox-esr build dependencies

[14th.presid...@gmail.com]

Greetings,

I just got bit by having SECURE_DELETE turned off in
databases/sqlite3, in that firefox failed the configure stage
but only after a couple of hours of building other stuff had
transpired.  I assume this applies equally to the other
firefox ports, and probably seamonkey, as well.

I know that other ports have checks to make sure that
certain flags are turned on in dependencies before
trying to build, but I'm not sure how much of a headache
that would be.

Anyway, thank you for all your hard work, and cheers!
___
freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gecko
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gecko-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

www/firefox-esr build dependencies

[14th.presid...@gmail.com]

___
freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gecko
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gecko-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Bug 227130] lang/rust: Update to 1.25

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227130

Jean-Sébastien Pédron  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dumbb...@freebsd.org
 Status|Open|In Progress

--- Comment #23 from Jean-Sébastien Pédron  ---
Hi!

I tested bdrewery's patch successfully on 10.4 amd64 and i386 with `poudriere
testport`. It's HEAD amd64's turn now.

Meanwhile, I will prepare the bootstraps for aarch64.

Thank you for preparing the patch!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gecko
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gecko-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"