On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 08:58:09PM -0700, "Jordan K. Hubbard" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://features.linuxtoday.com/stories/8191.html
A story on upcoming plans for the Linux 2.4 kernel. Since they're
going after a lot of the same performance goals we are, it's worth a
read.
- Jordan
On Sat, 31 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
The easiest way I can think of would be to add them to /etc/passwd and set
their shell and home dir to /nonexistant. Ideally you wouldn't be running
any other daemons, so there'd be no real way for them to access files; but
the stock ftpd, as well as
Then again, SQL seems to be the current buzz... Having SQL-based access
is cool/manageable (a friend generates the MySQL db from his Radius users
file).
And we do it the other way: Generate the users file from mysql. I rather
prefer it like that; then I can still auth users, if mysql goes
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wes Peters writes:
: Do we have a list of all services that use bpf? I'm willing to edit the man
: pages, given a list. I guess I could just grep-o-matic here, huh?
Yes. I'm also in a holding off pattern until we know the exact impact
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 23:46:26 +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
If no-one objects I'll submit a manpage per a.out(5) style tomorrow
for review untill it's ready for inclusion.
Anyone who objects to your submissions is a woes -- real bastards wait
for you to do
: [ENOBUFS] Insufficient system buffer space exists to complete the op-
:eration.
:
:Do you know what kind of circumstances that error *really* occurs
:under?
So you can get ENOBUFS not related to mbufs for UDP/local datagram
sockets, but you
On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 02:43:28AM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote:
I like the 'keeping it real' idea as well.
Then again, doesn't 3.2R+ support SecureRPC? Isn't this the sort of thing
NIS+ was invented for? A centralized db of users that you can then export
to various machines with differing
Judging by your description, why don't we use LyX? :) LaTeX sounds about
right.
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ___ ___ ___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!_ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/
On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 06:50:09PM -0600, Wes Peters wrote:
So, do you want to enumerate the cases in which this error can occur in the
man page? This is not generally done, now that we have verified it is
possible for the system to generate ENOBUFS on a writev. I think the text
stands as
On Sun, Aug 01, 1999, Juha Nurmela wrote:
Hello.
Sometimes it would be handy to pass a commandline
to a kld, preloaded modules already support
arguments. kldload(2) unfortunately has only
the pathname.ko argument.
Is this really a problem? Can the administrator not use
sysctl
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 1999, Juha Nurmela wrote:
Sometimes it would be handy to pass a commandline
to a kld, preloaded modules already support
arguments. kldload(2) unfortunately has only
the pathname.ko argument.
Is this really a problem? Can
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Keith Stevenson wrote:
the features that were requested. I honestly haven't figured out how to
implement the display of selected fields yet. I realize that this isn't a
Attached is a diff that takes care of that. Basically, the user can
specify a format that looks like
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John-Mark Gurney writes:
: I vote for allowing inetd.conf to specify a port number instead of a
: service name... it should be very easy to make the modification, and
: I'm willing to do all the work, assuming no one on -committers objects..
I'd love to be able to
* Andy Doran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990802 00:53]:
Wes Peters writes:
NetBSD doesn't have one as of 1.4, so they may be interested in yours. ;^)
It'd be cool if Asmodai could bounce this around one of the NetBSD lists
once it's near completion. tech-toolchain@ or tech-userlevel@ would be
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 15:10:18 MST, Doug wrote:
On some of the machines I administer I have some custom entries for
/etc/services that make more sense than the defaults, especially for
the ports 1023.
Would you need these entries if inetd let you specify port
In message 37a3e203.de0fe...@gorean.org, Doug wrote:
} Sheldon Hearn wrote:
}
} On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 15:05:14 MST, Doug wrote:
}
} I still haven't heard anyone answer the two key (IMO) questions.
}
} Your questions are easier answered in reverse order:
}
} and how do you
Jon Hamilton wrote:
No. ipfw deals with /etc/services only at startup time (any other behavior on
its part would be ridiculous).
That's not entirely true, there are other situations (like adding a
rule,
etc.) but your point is well taken. And no, I can't provide specific
examples, my
In message 37a3e944.7f28e...@gorean.org, Doug wrote:
} Jon Hamilton wrote:
}
} No. ipfw deals with /etc/services only at startup time (any other behavior
} on
} its part would be ridiculous).
}
} That's not entirely true, there are other situations (like adding a rul
} e,
} etc.) but
* Wes Peters (w...@softweyr.com) [990801 07:12]:
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
* Nik Clayton (n...@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) [990730 23:37]:
We have an a.out(5), but no elf(5) (as pointed out in docs/7914).
Does anyone feel up to writing one?
Saw it before, noticed it,
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 08:58:09PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard
j...@zippy.cdrom.com wrote:
http://features.linuxtoday.com/stories/8191.html
A story on upcoming plans for the Linux 2.4 kernel. Since they're
going after a lot of the same performance goals we are, it's worth a
read.
- Jordan
On Sat, 31 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
The easiest way I can think of would be to add them to /etc/passwd and set
their shell and home dir to /nonexistant. Ideally you wouldn't be running
any other daemons, so there'd be no real way for them to access files; but
the stock ftpd, as well as
Then again, SQL seems to be the current buzz... Having SQL-based access
is cool/manageable (a friend generates the MySQL db from his Radius users
file).
And we do it the other way: Generate the users file from mysql. I rather
prefer it like that; then I can still auth users, if mysql goes
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Mike Hoskins wrote:
As usual, there's more than one way to skin a cat.
And as always a bloodless vegetarian way too :)
I just don't see any justification in hacking away at all of your software
to bypass the passwd database. What is gained?
- alex
You better believe that
Warner Losh wrote:
In message 37a3b701.851df...@softweyr.com Wes Peters writes:
: Do we have a list of all services that use bpf? I'm willing to edit the man
: pages, given a list. I guess I could just grep-o-matic here, huh?
Yes. I'm also in a holding off pattern until we know the
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 23:46:26 +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
If no-one objects I'll submit a manpage per a.out(5) style tomorrow
for review untill it's ready for inclusion.
Anyone who objects to your submissions is a woes -- real bastards wait
for you to do
: [ENOBUFS] Insufficient system buffer space exists to complete
the op-
:eration.
:
:Do you know what kind of circumstances that error *really* occurs
:under?
So you can get ENOBUFS not related to mbufs for UDP/local datagram
sockets, but you
Jan B. Koum wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 08:58:09PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard
j...@zippy.cdrom.com wrote:
http://features.linuxtoday.com/stories/8191.html
From the article:
Linux 2.4 also includes a completely rewritten networking layer.
Great. After a few years from now when they
On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 02:43:28AM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote:
I like the 'keeping it real' idea as well.
Then again, doesn't 3.2R+ support SecureRPC? Isn't this the sort of thing
NIS+ was invented for? A centralized db of users that you can then export
to various machines with differing
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Doug wrote:
Jan B. Koum wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 08:58:09PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard
j...@zippy.cdrom.com wrote:
http://features.linuxtoday.com/stories/8191.html
From the article:
Linux 2.4 also includes a completely rewritten networking layer.
Judging by your description, why don't we use LyX? :) LaTeX sounds about
right.
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ___ ___ ___
gr...@freebsd.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!_ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Hello.
Sometimes it would be handy to pass a commandline
to a kld, preloaded modules already support
arguments. kldload(2) unfortunately has only
the pathname.ko argument.
Following url proposes patches to make a new syscall
kldload(char *pathname, char **argv, struct kldload *)
and keep old
On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 06:50:09PM -0600, Wes Peters wrote:
So, do you want to enumerate the cases in which this error can occur in the
man page? This is not generally done, now that we have verified it is
possible for the system to generate ENOBUFS on a writev. I think the text
stands as it
On Sun, Aug 01, 1999, Juha Nurmela wrote:
Hello.
Sometimes it would be handy to pass a commandline
to a kld, preloaded modules already support
arguments. kldload(2) unfortunately has only
the pathname.ko argument.
Is this really a problem? Can the administrator not use
sysctl
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 1999, Juha Nurmela wrote:
Sometimes it would be handy to pass a commandline
to a kld, preloaded modules already support
arguments. kldload(2) unfortunately has only
the pathname.ko argument.
Is this really a problem? Can
Wes Peters writes:
NetBSD doesn't have one as of 1.4, so they may be interested in yours. ;^)
It'd be cool if Asmodai could bounce this around one of the NetBSD lists
once it's near completion. tech-toolchain@ or tech-userlevel@ would be the
right place I guess.
- ad
To Unsubscribe: send
I've put a new version of stat(1) up for review. I've incorporated a few of
the features that were requested. I honestly haven't figured out how to
implement the display of selected fields yet. I realize that this isn't a
huge step forward over the previous revision, but my hacking hours are
It's getting better. I don't like that switch (errno) at all. But work on
it some more, make it feature-complete., and I'd love to be able to import
it.
Also, there's a bug:
access: Sun Aug 1 13:46:49 1999
Access: Sun Aug 1 00:09:26 1999
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Keith Stevenson wrote:
the features that were requested. I honestly haven't figured out how to
implement the display of selected fields yet. I realize that this isn't a
Attached is a diff that takes care of that. Basically, the user can
specify a format that looks like
In message 19990731161854.11...@hydrogen.fircrest.net John-Mark Gurney writes:
: I vote for allowing inetd.conf to specify a port number instead of a
: service name... it should be very easy to make the modification, and
: I'm willing to do all the work, assuming no one on -committers objects..
In message pine.bsf.4.05.9908020021290.9676-100...@pena.oh5nxo.ampr.org Juha
Nurmela writes:
: Yes, but (this might be a trademark ;) commonly the arguments would
: be used during the sysinit-attach, and at that time sysctl has not yet
: been able to change anything. Use of sysctl would require a
* Andy Doran (a...@netbsd.org) [990802 00:53]:
Wes Peters writes:
NetBSD doesn't have one as of 1.4, so they may be interested in yours. ;^)
It'd be cool if Asmodai could bounce this around one of the NetBSD lists
once it's near completion. tech-toolchain@ or tech-userlevel@ would be the
41 matches
Mail list logo
