It seems Sergey Babkin wrote:
I can't help keeping wondering if this MAA
is missing the point completely: why would
someone need the decryption to make a _copy_ ?
A copy is a copy and it appears to me that
the encrypted bits written on the disk surface
could be copied just exactly as well
A question to the network experts:
I want to build a router between FDDI and Fast Ethernet
(possibly without creating a subnet - something like arp proxy
but that's more an IP issue; maybe someone can comment this also)
My question is more hardware oriented:
I'm thinking of using two PCI
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
: If you got REAL LIFE NUMBERS, based on REAL LIFE PERFORMANCE, then we
: can talk. Let's see how it does Quake, then we can talk.
:
:Alpha does quake? :-)
Not that I know of, but MIPS/SGI does. (hint hint)
Jamie Bowden
--
"Of course, that's
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
I'm thinking of using two PCI network cards. Fast Ethernet, no problem.
But FDDI, what card?
fpa0: Digital DEFPA PCI FDDI Controller port 0xe400-0xe47f mem
0xfafd-0xfafd,0xfafee000-0xfafee07f irq 4 at device 6.0 on pci0
fpa0: DEC DEFPA
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:24:51 +0100 (MET)
Borja Marcos [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
borjam 1 - host.domain (following the "domain" or "search" directive)
borjam 2 - host
borjam 3 - A host.domain
borjam 4 - A host
Specifying `options no_tld_query' in
Hi,
Specifying `options no_tld_query' in /etc/resolv.conf may helps you.
Yes, you're right, thanks
But, isn't that behavior a bug?
Borja.
--
***
Borja Marcos* Internet:
Hi,
Specifying `options no_tld_query' in /etc/resolv.conf may helps you.
Yes, you're right, thanks
But, isn't that behavior a bug?
Yes the behaviour of getaddrinfo() is bug.
But as you already have noticed it, the fix is not simple, so
it will be tried after 4.0.
For
I have started getting a panic in the past couple of weeks on my
4.0-Current system. The immediate symptom is disk related. I was
wondering if anybody could give me some hints in trying to determine if
this is hardware or software.
The problem occurs under heavy disk (SCSI) load "rm -rf
On Tuesday, 22 February 2000 at 11:10:47 -0800, Brian Beattie wrote:
I have started getting a panic in the past couple of weeks on my
4.0-Current system. The immediate symptom is disk related. I was
wondering if anybody could give me some hints in trying to determine if
this is hardware or
Do we have anyone actively working on Voice Over IP (VOIP) programs or
other interfaces for FreeBSD? I'm highly interested and would be willing
to assist in anyway that I can.
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
I'm thinking of using two PCI network cards. Fast Ethernet, no problem.
But FDDI, what card?
fpa0: Digital DEFPA PCI FDDI Controller port 0xe400-0xe47f mem
0xfafd-0xfafd,0xfafee000-0xfafee07f irq 4 at
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Wes Peters wrote:
Can you still buy them? If so, what are they called now that DEC doesn't
exist anymore?
I think Compaq has always sold them under their own label though I've
never had my hands on any to verify this.
I'm pretty sure that some 3com boards are actually
Ok, I've reproduced the NFS problem:
server cp /usr/bin/vi vi1
client ./vi1
server echo vi1
client (try to do somtehing in vi, like 'o')
I'm tracking it down now. I should be able to work up a fix quickly
and get an approved commit in for 4.0.
(Reply-To set to
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Wes Peters wrote:
Can you still buy them? If so, what are they called now that DEC doesn't
exist anymore?
I think Compaq has always sold them under their own label though I've
never had my hands on any to verify this.
There is a very recent and not yet complete "openH323" port which should
be a way to VoIP.
TfH
Kris Kirby wrote:
Do we have anyone actively working on Voice Over IP (VOIP) programs or
other interfaces for FreeBSD? I'm highly interested and would be willing
to assist in anyway that
Maksim Yevmenkin writes:
Here are some small patches for NETGRAPH.
These are against -current cvsup'ed yesterday around 8:30pm EST.
http://home.earthlink.net/~evmax/ng.tar.gz
It also includes small test program (based on nghook).
Compile and run it like:
# ./a.out -a iface_name:
Here is the description. ng_ether node has two hooks ``divert'' and
``orphan''.
It is possible to connect to the one of the hooks and
intercept row Ethernet
frames. But there is no clean way to intercept frame, do
something and
return it back to kernel.
This patch provides
Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO writes:
Here is the description. ng_ether node has two hooks ``divert'' and
``orphan''.
It is possible to connect to the one of the hooks and
intercept row Ethernet
frames. But there is no clean way to intercept frame, do
something and
return it
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO writes:
Here is the description. ng_ether node has two hooks ``divert'' and
``orphan''.
It is possible to connect to the one of the hooks and
intercept row Ethernet
frames. But there is no clean way to intercept frame, do
Julian Elischer writes:
ok. i just have a dumb question. what is the big deal with updating
ether_shost
in ethernet header in ngether_rcvdata. since we are passing raw ethernet
frame,
why should we update ether_shost? wouldn't it be nice to make it optional?
just another
20 matches
Mail list logo
