I am busy to convert two lkm's to kld's and having some problem with it.
-
KLD's on 3-STABLE and 4.0-CURRENT
-
The scenario is two lkm's ( now kld's ) which are loaded dependantly ( A and B
)
I used to load them as :
/sbin/modload -o
hi, there!
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Chet Ramey wrote:
: to
:
: sh_subdirs=${SUBDIRS}; for f in $$sh_subdirs ; do ...
there's lots of other workarounds, from seeing if SUBDIRS is defined,
to using make's .foreach.
Another option is:
for f in $$empty_list
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chet Ramey writes:
for f in $$empty_list ${SUBDIRS}; do ...
Not bad, but will break if the shell is run with the `-u' option on
for some reason.
Ok, how about:
for f in $$IFS ${SUBDIRS}; do ...
Ian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 07-Mar-00 Johan Kruger wrote:
But now it still looks as if the two modules dont know about each other.
Is there an example of something like this lying around ??? How do i
(link)
the symbols to the second KLD loaded ???
I don't see why this wouldn't work..
eg b is dependant on a?
Try
Hi there, sorry to bother you, just want to as two quick questions ..
I looked as examples at ncp.ko and nwfs.ko ???
1) If i look in the compiled nwfs directory, what is the __hack_file for ??,
and the ncp file ( not the ncp.ko ) in the nwfs directory ?? ( I am actually
able to load this ncp
here is a module that compiles into the ucd-snmp agent which allows access
to a (at this time) limited selection of the data for all the ipfw rules.
it can be fetched from:
ftp://ftp.reptiles.org/pub/FreeBSD/other/ucdipfw-0.1.tar.gz
here is the attached readme:
ucd-snmp support for IPFW rules
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Chris Costello wrote:
On Monday, March 06, 2000, Max Khon wrote:
However, under Solaris 2.6:
clone$uname -a
SunOS clone 5.6 Generic_105181-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1-Engine
clone$/bin/ksh
clone$for i in ; do echo $i; done
/bin/ksh: syntax error: `;' unexpected
* David Scheidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000307 11:18]:
esc-M ctrl-V will give you version info, at least in ksh88. Neither HP nor
Solaris appear to use ksh93.
Solaris' ksh93 implementation is /usr/dt/bin/dtksh (Version M-12/28/93d).
--
Arindum
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Hellmuth Michaelis writes:
to add a negraph interface to the B channels should be quite easy.
If you need help I can prbably almost do most of it..
Its already in the development sources (Archie had a look at it already)
and it works with mppd. It was really quite easy, although if
Juergen Lock writes:
when this is done the netgraph PPP nodes (which can support
these compression types will be usable.
They could, but they don't yet, right? :)
Maybe it still should be added to ijppp first cause debugging user
processes is easier than the kernel... and at the
"Jim" == Jim Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jim This is not a microsoft innovation, actually, I believe it
Jim was a VMS innovation. It's called a generational filesystem.
Jim the original is stored, and later generations of the file are
Jim stored as diffs.
IIRC, plan9 has
Imagine: cp file file2, file and file2 reference the same exact blocks,
but modified chunks of file2 would be given their own private blocks.
This is not a microsoft innovation, actually, I believe it was a VMS
innovation. It's called a generational filesystem. the original is
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already have code for MPPC/MPPE, minus the proprietary STAC
code and the patented RC4 algorithm,
I have read in several places that only the name "RC4" is trademarked,
and that the algorithm itself is not
John Polstra writes:
I already have code for MPPC/MPPE, minus the proprietary STAC
code and the patented RC4 algorithm,
I have read in several places that only the name "RC4" is trademarked,
and that the algorithm itself is not patented. Is that not the case?
Oops, my
We're having a problem where very very rarely we get a segfault on exec of
something, and I finally caught it:
# gdb menu
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or
We're having a problem where very very rarely we get a segfault on exec of
something, and I finally caught it:
Here's a better backtrace, sorry. :)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x2813862d in vfprintf () from /usr/lib/libc.so.3
(gdb) bt
#0 0x2813862d in vfprintf
We're having a problem where very very rarely we get a segfault on exec of
something, and I finally caught it:
Ack... Ignore this whole thread... The first backtrace looked like
builtin_new was causing this... someone replaced my new/delete in this, and
didn't tell me.
Bad day.
John Polstra wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already have code for MPPC/MPPE, minus the proprietary STAC
code and the patented RC4 algorithm,
I have read in several places that only the name "RC4" is trademarked,
and that the
I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP
wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y
wd0s1f/usr 18849MB UFS Y
the /var one struck me as
* Luke Hollins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000307 17:49] wrote:
I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP
wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y
wd0s1f
I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP
wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y
wd0s1f/usr 18849MB UFS Y
the /var one struck
Mike Walker wrote:
I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP
wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y
wd0s1f/usr 18849MB UFS Y
Luke Hollins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP
wd0s1e/var20MB
Bottom line: I think it should stay the way it is now. :-)
And since I agree, I suspect it will. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Sorry if this is a repost but I didnt see it come throug yet and my mail was
screwed up.
I am working with a BookPC whith an intel 810 all in one chipset.
I was wondering if there was planned support for the sound and if someone
has heard anyting about the Xfree86 (linux) LKM being ported to
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 04:06:24AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Luke Hollins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
:On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 04:06:24AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
: Luke Hollins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
: I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
: what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
: wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
My laptop running 3.4-RELEASE decided it doesn't want to boot.
It was uncleanly shut down via the power switch by someone
who thought they were shutting down a different machine.
Now when it boots, running fsck gives this result:
chip0: Intel 82439TX System Controller (MTXC) rev 0x01 on
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, David E. Cross wrote:
:Version 2 of the lock manager is ready to be released. Amitha
:says that it passes all of the tests in the suite posted by Drew (thanks
:Drew). A noteable exception to this is on SGI where some lock requests
:are never even received from the remote
29 matches
Mail list logo
