RTLD thread safety

When I try to compile a simple multi threaded program using a wrapper around rfork (from linuxthreads port), I get the following core dump: ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:54 Investigation into code reveals that lazy resolution of symbols (using PLTs) was happen

Re: Missing keyboard symbols

On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Doug Barton wrote: > Heh... You know, I started to type out something to the effect of, > "... space bar. FreeBSD has been mapping the Space Bar to the Any key > combination since about 1992 to get around the restrictions of modern PC > keyboards." But I thought there w

Re: syslogd stops logging - caught in the act

I asked Sue to get a ktrace of the syslogd, and here's the output: 18869 syslogd 954045445.977145 PSIG SIGALRM caught handler=0x804b068 mask=0x0 code=0x0 18869 syslogd 954045445.977343 RET poll -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call 18869 syslogd 954045445.977366 CALL gettimeofday(0xbfbfc5

Re: freebsd-hackers-digest V4 #792

Ben, relax, the gentleman in question subscribed to freebsd-hackers-digest and confused that list with freebsd-hackers. i have sent him email explaining the situation. > > >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the messa

Re: Request for review (HW checksum patches)

On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:25:33PM -0500, Keith Stevenson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 06:56:42PM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > > > The patches I have were designed to solve a single problem, just > > checksum offloading. There are enough bits left in the new flag field > > that you could

syslogd stops logging - caught in the act

Let's solve this once and for all. I've run syslogd -d and sent output to a file and waited for the inevitable cessation of logging although syslogd is still running. (Refer PRs 2191 5548 6216 8847 8865 10553 and two or three threads in -isp and/or -questions earlier this year that summarised the

Re: Request for review (HW checksum patches)

On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 06:56:42PM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > The patches I have were designed to solve a single problem, just > checksum offloading. There are enough bits left in the new flag field > that you could use for something else, I don't know enough about what > you'd want to do

Re: freebsd-hackers-digest V4 #792

Sam Samalin wrote: > unsubscribe freebsd-hackers which part of the following didn't you understand? >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-

Re: shell issue

On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Dungeonkeeper wrote: > > > Hi there, > > First of all: I want to apologise for my poor english. > > Today me and a few friends of mine discussed the shells' (well, shell is > actualy one of: sh/bash/csh/tcsh... not tested for ksh) command line expansion > routines, main

Re: Request for review (HW checksum patches)

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >> From: Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 13:35:53 -0600 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Request for review (HW checksum patches) >> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i >> Delivered-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> X-Loop: Fr

Re: Request for review (HW checksum patches)

In article you write: >FWIW, Win2000 has a mechanism for dealing with what they call task >offloading. If you decide to attack the problem, an inexpensive device you >can use for testing is the 3C905B; it does IP+TCP checksums. Yes, unfortunately it doesn't handle fragments at all. I looked a

Re: Shim Code #error needed

On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 05:04:11PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brooks Davis writes: > : I like it. The new entry in UPDATING should help, but it's easy to > : forget and the current errors aren't very obvious. > > Well, I *WROTE* the entry in UPDATING (or at least

Re: Shim Code #error needed

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brooks Davis writes: : I like it. The new entry in UPDATING should help, but it's easy to : forget and the current errors aren't very obvious. Well, I *WROTE* the entry in UPDATING (or at least committed it, I can't recall now). The only person I can think of that

Re: Shim Code #error needed

On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 01:43:12PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > I've been burned about 6 times now by the shim device support becoming > optional. Oh well, that's current. > > However, I was thinking that it would be nice if there was something > simple to grep for to see what drivers still ne

Re: Mylex Support

On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 16:26:32 -0500, Colin wrote: > A friend of mine (FreeBSD user, between ISP'S) would like to know if > anybody is working on support for Mylex Flashpoint BT950. He has one and is > willing to port the driver from either Linux or BSDI, but is unwilling to > duplicate th

Re: Request for review (HW checksum patches)

FWIW, Win2000 has a mechanism for dealing with what they call task offloading. If you decide to attack the problem, an inexpensive device you can use for testing is the 3C905B; it does IP+TCP checksums. Sam - Original Message - From: "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL

Re: freebsd-hackers-digest V4 #792

unsubscribe freebsd-hackers freebsd-hackers-digest wrote: > freebsd-hackers-digestSaturday, March 25 2000Volume 04 : Number 792 > > In this issue: > Re: shell issue > Re: top sorting error > zsh compdef collection for FreeBSD > Missing keyboard symbols > Re: top sorting error > 3.x -> 4.

Mylex Support

A friend of mine (FreeBSD user, between ISP'S) would like to know if anybody is working on support for Mylex Flashpoint BT950. He has one and is willing to port the driver from either Linux or BSDI, but is unwilling to duplicate the effort if someone else already has this beast in hand.

Re: Dreamweaver 2

On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, VR Dredge wrote: > Hi, my name is Robert. > I came across your address while trying to find a crack for Dreamweaver > 2.I've got to admit I'm pretty green at this sort of thing, so I guess I'm > asking if you have or know where I can it. Also are there any programs for >

Re: Request for review (HW checksum patches)

> From: Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 13:35:53 -0600 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Request for review (HW checksum patches) > X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i > Delivered-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > I have a set of patches which al

Shim Code #error needed

I've been burned about 6 times now by the shim device support becoming optional. Oh well, that's current. However, I was thinking that it would be nice if there was something simple to grep for to see what drivers still needed to be converted. What would people think of my adding the following

Request for review (HW checksum patches)

I have a set of patches which allows offloading checksums to NICs which support it (right now, only the Alteon based cards). The patch is at . Note that the alpha bits are currently untested. -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Unicode on FreeBSD

Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > (Earlier versions of) these have been submitted in PRs #15545 and > #15840, but for some reason they have never been committed. > don't give up. It's not immediatly who is responsible for this, but it's something that is generally considered an important futur

Re: Unicode on FreeBSD

MikeM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone thought of Unicode support on FreeBSD? It has crossed my mind... > I think that it is inevitable that eventually FreeBSD > will *need* to support unicode if it wants to continue > as a viable operating system in the future. Probably. The demand fo

Re: Dreamweaver 2

On Saturday, March 25, 2000, VR Dredge wrote: > Hi, my name is Robert. > I came across your address while trying to find a crack for Dreamweaver > 2.I've got to admit I'm pretty green at this sort of thing, so I guess I'm > asking if you have or know where I can it. Also are there any programs

Comments above kmem_malloc() (vm/vm_kern.c)

Is the following comment above kmem_malloc()'s definition in: /sys/vm/vm_kern.c ... still valid? (I hope and suspect not): " * Note that this still only works in a uni-processor environment and * when called at splhigh(). " The only places, as far as I've seen, that ca

Dreamweaver 2

Hi, my name is Robert. I came across your address while trying to find a crack for Dreamweaver 2.I've got to admit I'm pretty green at this sort of thing, so I guess I'm asking if you have or know where I can it. Also are there any programs for generating cracks, passwords and so on To Un