In muc.lists.freebsd.hackers, you wrote:
>Are there any device driver authors out there who are implementing
>their driver as a KLD module and delivering/installing it as a port?
You may look inside emulation/rtc or emulation/vmware port, it's
not a drivers for hardware, but a KLD modules.
--
Vl
On Thursday, July 20, 2000, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
> Yep, you were right. /dev/null was a plain file. Strange
Just guessing here--ps probably uses /dev/null for all the
files passed to kvm_open(3). I imagine it uses kvm_getprocs for
its process listing, which is implemented using sysctl.
--
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Jan Koum wrote:
> hey ulf, i bet your /dev/null is no longer nulling:
>
> # cd /dev
> # rm null
> # echo "fuck" > null
no... really. Tell us how you feel Jan.
*chuckle*
Doug
--
"Live free or die"
- State motto of my ancestral homeland, Ne
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 04:51:46PM -0700, Jan Koum wrote:
> hey ulf, i bet your /dev/null is no longer nulling:
>
> # cd /dev
> # rm null
> # echo "fuck" > null
> # ps ax
> ps: bad namelist
Yep, you were right. /dev/null was a plain file. Strange
>
>
> -- yan
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 03:
hey ulf, i bet your /dev/null is no longer nulling:
# cd /dev
# rm null
# echo "fuck" > null
# ps ax
ps: bad namelist
-- yan
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 03:39:53PM -0700, Ulf Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 01:02:59PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ulf Zi
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 03:48:23PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
>
> > and still:
> >
> > fourtytwo ulf home/ulf > ps
> > ps: bad namelist
>
> You're not bypassing the loader when you boot are you?
No, the machine is a pure FreeBSD machine, but uses t
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
> and still:
>
> fourtytwo ulf home/ulf > ps
> ps: bad namelist
You're not bypassing the loader when you boot are you?
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscri
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 01:02:59PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote:
>
>
> Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 09:09:47PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I updated via cvsup (cvsup from tuesday afternoon PDT),
I have upgraded my device driver for the subject soundcard.
For features, capabilities, limitations and downloading see:
http://www.treefort.org/~bobkat/msm20/9main.shtml
This version has many bug fixes since the FBSD-3.x version. It is still
dual mode. KLD module can be kldload/kldunlo
Does kernel memory of the same type (e.g., M_TEMP) must be allocated
(using malloc()) with the same (range of) size? BTW, how to display mbuf
cluster usages info. Thanks.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Bjorn Tornqvist wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> Can anyone please explain why I have to be root (or make the executable
> run as root) to be able to use SCHED_RR in my LinuxThreads (btw, same
> thing happens in pthreads) application?
1) Note that the default sch
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 06:38:13PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday, 20 July 2000 at 18:33:42 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > On Thursday, 20 July 2000 at 9:55:13 +0100, Geoff Buckingham wrote:
> >>
> >> Does anybody with a knowledge of the vinum code have an opinion on
> >> the amount of work
On Thursday, 20 July 2000 at 18:33:42 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday, 20 July 2000 at 9:55:13 +0100, Geoff Buckingham wrote:
>>
>> Does anybody with a knowledge of the vinum code have an opinion on
>> the amount of work involved in getting vinum to the point that
>> several JBODs in a FC
On Thursday, 20 July 2000 at 9:55:13 +0100, Geoff Buckingham wrote:
>
> Does anybody with a knowledge of the vinum code have an opinion on
> the amount of work involved in getting vinum to the point that
> several JBODs in a FC switched fabric could be managed, as a vinum
> volume, by one machine
Does anybody with a knowledge of the vinum code have an opinion on the amount
of work involved in getting vinum to the point that several JBODs in a FC
switched fabric could be managed, as a vinum volume, by one machine, and
mounted ro by that machine and several others on the switch fabric.
Hi all!
Can anyone please explain why I have to be root (or make the executable
run as root) to be able to use SCHED_RR in my LinuxThreads (btw, same
thing happens in pthreads) application?
pthread_create() returns an "Operation not permitted" error if not run
as root.
My application *must not*
16 matches
Mail list logo
