David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 12:07:49AM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
I thought the space staked out by the *BSD gang was approximately
this:
NetBSD - the least amount of platform-specific code possible; run
on most anything
OpenBSD - pro-active security,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Daniel C. Sobral" writes:
: ported to every hardware platform under sun, and we do not go out of our
: way to provide security. Thus, NetBSD and OpenBSD have the edge on us on
What? I don't see how you can say that about security...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Daniel C. Sobral" writes:
: ported to every hardware platform under sun, and we do not go out of our
: way to provide security. Thus, NetBSD and OpenBSD have the edge on us on
What? I don't see how you can say that about security...
We
Ok, sometimes we find a bug in a particular release where what's
needed is a function replaced with fixed code.
I'm wondering if it's possible to:
1) look at the kernel symbol table for a particular function in a
particular object file (static functions would be even better?)
2) replace the
Ok, sometimes we find a bug in a particular release where what's
needed is a function replaced with fixed code.
I'm wondering if it's possible to:
1) look at the kernel symbol table for a particular function in a
particular object file (static functions would be even better?)
2)
afaik, Yes. There are two articles that I know of that deal with the
specifics of modifying binaries to inject ones own code. The first is one
that deals mostly with libbfd (binary file descriptor) and linux. iirc,
libbfd worked a great deal better under linux than under FreeBSD. I
recall
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I am trying to configure a FreeBSD 3.3 box to act as a gateway/NAT
translater for my network.
I have added the following to the my rc.conf
ifconfig_tun0="inet 172.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
gateway_enabled="YES"
natd_enabled="YES"
natd_ingerface="tun0"
and tun0 to my network_interfaces
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 12:07:49AM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
I thought the space staked out by the *BSD gang was approximately
this:
NetBSD - the least amount of platform-specific code possible; run
on most anything
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Daniel C. Sobral" writes:
: ported to every hardware platform under sun, and we do not go out of our
: way to provide security. Thus, NetBSD and OpenBSD have the edge on us on
What? I don't see how you can
I submitted and started debugging kern/23409: CD-RW driver fails
unless CD in drive at boot up.
I seem to be getting error code 0x5 and 0x10 from acd_mode_sense()
when I'm booting up. What do those error codes mean? Do they
correspond to the error register bits listed in atapi-all.h?
#define
11 matches
Mail list logo