Paul Saab wrote:
Thierry Herbelot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Paul Saab wrote:
Hi,
My problem is that the NIC I'm trying to boot from is an on-board fxp on
a Motorola p-III M/B (I assume there is no specific "PXE rom", as PXE
may be included in the BIOS)
will your "intel
Thierry Herbelot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
they've done this, but their newest BIOS (8 days old) still has a 0.78
PXE revision (I've seen more recent DELL machines with a 0.99 - I assume
this is better)
No.. 0.99 is the orginal PXE v1. PXE v2 (build 78) is what you have
and is highly buggy.
Paul Saab wrote:
Thierry Herbelot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
they've done this, but their newest BIOS (8 days old) still has a 0.78
PXE revision (I've seen more recent DELL machines with a 0.99 - I assume
this is better)
No.. 0.99 is the orginal PXE v1. PXE v2 (build 78) is what you
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 08:23:51PM -0800, Dima Dorfman wrote:
Obviously, this isn't the desired mode of failure. Attached is a
patch that will make sysctl_kern_proc return ESRCH if it didn't find
any processes. AFAIK, without the patch, the only way to detect this
condition (no processes
Hi,
I just read your reply in the hackers mailing list regarding c++
exceptions.
Does that mean that now (or from release 4.3 on) the base system
g++ is bugfixed regarding SIGSEGVs with c++ exceptions?
What causes the bug in exception handling?
Why does the packaged g++ work?
Thanks in
Thus spake Leif Neland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just to get the facts clear: Do you ever intend to write a book?
A "Developers Handbook", which will also cover device driver and
kernel module programming is in work under the leadership of Jeroen
Ruigrok van der Werven [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Once it
Bill Paul wrote:
Some body just told me that williams Paul from Columbia University (Bill
Paul @ Freebsd.org) has written that
kind of book. But I can't get his exact email address at FreeBSD.org to
ask him the reference.
GR.
Look, I have not now nor have I *ever* written
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was at the time - socketpair(2) had totally slipped my mind ;)
Umm, you want pipe(2), not socketpair(2).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 04:53:34PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was at the time - socketpair(2) had totally slipped my mind ;)
Umm, you want pipe(2), not socketpair(2).
Actually, I want socketpair(2). pipe(2) was what I used before,
and
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 04:53:34PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was at the time - socketpair(2) had totally slipped my mind ;)
Umm, you want pipe(2), not socketpair(2).
Actually, I want
On 17-Mar-01 Peter Pentchev wrote:
Actually, I want socketpair(2). pipe(2) was what I used before,
and that's the reason I had a read-only file descriptor - the portalfs
architecture allows for only one fd to be returned, and pipe(2)
provides a one-way pipe. I dup2'd stdout and stderr
Hi!
I try to install FreeBSD 4.1
when the proces of copying begin, (near 20% of /bin copied)
I receive such error
panic: general protection fault
syncing disks .. 99.. 99 99 99
automatic reboot in 15 seconds, press any key to abort.
Thank you very much for any help.
To Unsubscribe:
Sir:
It would be helpful to include the output of the boot sequence,
a description of your hardware. Followups to -hackers please.
I try to install FreeBSD 4.1
when the proces of copying begin, (near 20% of /bin copied)
I receive such error
panic: general protection fault
syncing
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 09:55:34AM +0100, Titus von Boxberg wrote:
Hi,
I just read your reply in the hackers mailing list regarding c++
exceptions.
Does that mean that now (or from release 4.3 on) the base system
g++ is bugfixed regarding SIGSEGVs with c++ exceptions?
Bug, which found
* Farooq Mela [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010316 23:21] wrote:
Howdy,
GCC 2.95.3 was just released. I did notice that there are some bug fixes
in the optimizer, and some various other fixes etc. Considering the
recent discussion about incorrect code generation due to -O2 and above,
are there any
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, that single 4GB of address space is divided up into kernel data
structures, which are in the address space of the process but subject
to various levels of MMU-provided memory protection, and the process'
own "user data." I believe the break is
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 10:46:42AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
GCC 2.95.3 was just released. I did notice that there are some bug fixes
...
in the optimizer, and some various other fixes etc. Considering the
recent discussion about incorrect code generation due to -O2 and above,
I
17 matches
Mail list logo