On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 4:09 AM +0200 5/15/01, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd suggest going ahead and committing it ASAP - before people start
``discussing'' it again :oI
from my point of view, it would
Mon, May 14, 2001 at 17:45:02, bright (Alfred Perlstein) wrote about Re: wint_t:
The C standard says that wchar_t should be able to all members of thye
largest extended chracter set. AFAIK FreeBSD doesn't have any character
set which requires more than 8 bits.
wint_t should also be
Mon, May 14, 2001 at 00:17:31, dima (Dima Dorfman) wrote about MIN()/MAX()
definitions in sys/param.h:
Is there a reason the definitions of the MIN() and MAX() macros in
sys/param.h are under an '#ifndef _KERNEL'? Quite a few files in the
kernel define these (well, at least MIN)
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
Still, let me say that I do hope to get back to 'xargs', and add
the -I option. I must admit my enthusiasm for doing -I wore off
after seeing the current code to 'xargs'. Not only
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
1. Is ssh working yet?
Yes, it is working perfectly. The only problem is that it now works
slightly differently to what people have expected. ie: it treats
sshv1 rsa keys as totally seperate to
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 04:24:48PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Jordan Hubbard wrote:
ssh works just fine for me in 4.3. You must be doing something
wrong.
I used that sysinstall thing Jordan wrote to upgrade
from a 4.2 to a 4.3 system.
Is that what I'm
Valentin Nechayev wrote:
Modern Unicode allows character codes more than 65534.
wchar_t(65536) is Egyptian glyph;) Maximum allowed AFAIR is
2**31-1. So at least 32 bits integer type required if you
don't want adapt system to former millennium requires.
This argument came up on
Hi,
My doubt is whether freebsd uses the normal mbuf clusters in case of large amount
of data (like jumbogram in ipv6 or the maximum ipv4 datagram size of 65536 bytes)?
My understanding is that for such a large amount of data, clusters which can hold
only 2048 byes are not economical.
Hi,
My doubt is how data will be organized in buffers in case we want to transmit large
amount of data.
My doubt is regarding the organization of mbufs in case we want to transmit the
maximum ip datagram size.
In the normal case data is stored in clusters for data size greater than
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:15:56AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My doubt is whether freebsd uses the normal mbuf clusters in case
of large amount of data (like jumbogram in ipv6 or the maximum ipv4
datagram size of 65536 bytes)?
FreeBSD provides two standard types of storage (mbufs and
Hello there,
I wonder if anybody here has any experience with compiling
pure IPv6 system without IPv4 support in the kernel at all?
Are there any projects like that?
Alexis
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
First let me apologize for butting in like this - I get hackers via the
digest, so its tough
to reply to the right people.
I think its useful to note the principle of a bootable CD. You don't really
boot the CD. (No really)
What you are doing is loading an image of a floppy into RAM, the BIOS
At 11:52 PM -0700 5/14/01, Dima Dorfman ably wrote:
This is a simplistic example that can be done in many other ways
(including using -J), but it shows what -I is supposed to be able to
do. -J doesn't work with the above since it only looks for the
replstr once, and will not find it unless it's
I saw this the other day:
http://www.sleepycat.com/historic.html
Down at the bottom:
Finally, you should not upgrade your GNU gcc or Solaris compiler.
Optimizations in versions of gcc 2 that were in alpha test in the
summer of 1997, and a version of the standard Solaris WorkShop Compiler
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:16:23PM -0700, Farooq Mela wrote:
Hi -hackers,
Just a quick question.
What value of __FreeBSD_version should I require for kqueue? (I mean
osreldate.h) - was it introduced in 4.1 or 4.2 (memory fails me)?
osreldate.h was introduced a loong time ago, and it was
In article local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Hi -hackers,
Just a quick question.
What value of __FreeBSD_version should I require for kqueue? (I mean
osreldate.h) - was it introduced in 4.1 or 4.2 (memory fails me)?
It was introduced with 4.1; I believe the correct
Will Andrews wrote:
osreldate.h was introduced a loong time ago, and it was subsequently
obsoleted two years ago in favor of sys/param.h.
The CVS logs will indicate which __FreeBSD_version you need for
kqueue(). I imagine the number is around 45.
Thanks. Maybe the documentation for
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
It was introduced with 4.1; I believe the correct __FreeBSD_version
to use is 41000.
--
Jonathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Great, thanks. I figured you'd be the authority on this one
Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:39:52, tlambert2 (Terry Lambert) wrote about Re: wint_t:
[...skip...]
I maintain that the correct size for wchar_t is 16 bits,
until someone can point to a character set that needs
more than that, and which has been ratified by a standards
body.
I'm fully agreed
Tue, May 15, 2001 at 16:39:29, fmela0 (Farooq Mela) wrote about Re: Kqueue and
FreeBSD versions:
It was introduced with 4.1; I believe the correct __FreeBSD_version
to use is 41000.
s/41000/41/ - fix typo at least.
Great, thanks. I figured you'd be the authority on this one ;-)
HI,
i have freebsd 4.2 stable.
i want to know how autoconfiguration feature of ipv6
gets enabled.
as far as i know ifioctl will call if_up . if_up calls
if_route and if_route calls in6_if_up which calls
in6_ifattach which forms link local address.
but how is ifioctl is initiated for a
21 matches
Mail list logo
