Hi,
The 2.13_1 complains about this:
ladoga:/usr/home/admin/nsouch/ggi-core/libgiiautoconf
configure.in:157: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default to allow cross compiling
autoconf: Undefined macros:
configure.in:247:AC_CHECK_WINFUNCS(gettimeofday strdup nanosleep usleep _exit \
Possibly dumb question: OK, you specified makeoptions DEBUG=-g in your
kernel config file. Did you also run config(8) with the -g option?
G'luck,
Peter
--
The rest of this sentence is written in Thailand, on
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 10:59:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both the kernel
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 08:30:35AM +0200, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
Hi,
The 2.13_1 complains about this:
ladoga:/usr/home/admin/nsouch/ggi-core/libgiiautoconf
configure.in:157: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default to allow cross compiling
autoconf: Undefined macros:
Hello Hackers,
i think the tcp code in 4.3-RELEASE (and at least stable from last week) has
a serious bug in tcp handling:
I use LPRng 3.6.20 and openssh on the 4.3 box, lpd-server is on a 4.1 box.
Issuing 4-5 lpq's in a minute gives Connection timed out.
First i thought it may be a problem
The only strange occurrence I've seen that sounds even vaguely
similar is that if you leave out a nameserver line in
/compat/linux/etc/hosts, it *doesn't* default to 127.1.
Try adding a nameserver line (if you haven't already got one).
Hi,
Six million *.rpm files later, I've finally got
I use LPRng 3.6.20 and openssh on the 4.3 box, lpd-server is on a 4.1 box.
Issuing 4-5 lpq's in a minute gives Connection timed out.
First i thought it may be a problem with LPRng, but scp'ing large files
doesnt work anymore, too. Even ssh hangs sometimes.
I tried to disable the newreno
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:21:11AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 08:30:35AM +0200, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
Hi,
The 2.13_1 complains about this:
ladoga:/usr/home/admin/nsouch/ggi-core/libgiiautoconf
configure.in:157: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 01:58:08PM +0200, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:21:11AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 08:30:35AM +0200, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
Hi,
The 2.13_1 complains about this:
Is anyone working on an i810E driver for BSD? Specifically something that will enable the 3D
hardware acceleration and make it useful for OpenGL, X, etc?
I'm looking at this for a pet summer project, and
wanted to make certain I wasn't duplicating any effort. All these Dell boxes come
Hello,
I am writing (in fact I am getting a lot of code from
/usr/src/usr.bin/vmstat) an Orca data collector for FreeBSD. I think it would
be great to have the performance data available in Orca.
I am thinking about representing the following parameters:
CPU
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:53:53PM +0400, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
I use LPRng 3.6.20 and openssh on the 4.3 box, lpd-server is on a 4.1 box.
Issuing 4-5 lpq's in a minute gives Connection timed out.
First i thought it may be a problem with LPRng, but scp'ing large files
doesnt work
Hello,
can please someone enlighten me how can a module catch ip packets before
they actually enter the stack, the way ipfw or ipf does ? I tried to look
at the sources, but ipfw seems to do it some very specific way which
is based on some in-kernel hacks to make it possible (ofcourse correct me
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:53:53PM +0400, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
I use LPRng 3.6.20 and openssh on the 4.3 box, lpd-server is on a 4.1 box.
Issuing 4-5 lpq's in a minute gives Connection timed out.
First i thought it may be a problem with LPRng, but scp'ing large files
doesnt work
You mean in /etc/defaults/pccard.conf ? or in /etc/rc.conf ?
thanks.
: hostname pccardd[87]: No free configuration for card 3Com Corporation
You need a second config line to the 3com entry.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe
freebsd-hackers in the body
Hello,
msgs reminded me the old UNIX news command and then, I started to
fiddle around it. As I want to post stuff, it works good with msgs -s.
However, in the man pages, they suggest:
The line
msgs: | /usr/bin/msgs -s
should be included in /etc/mail/aliases (see
A few days ago I got my Dell 8100 (1.5 ghz and 128 Mb
of ram) in the mail. Naturally I desided to install
Freebsd 4.0 on it along with preinstalled WindowsME.
So I used Partition Magic to cut the 40 gig windows
partition and add a partition for freebsd (about 5
gigs allocated). The installation
I think you've missed the fact that the '486 solution requires an
add-on board (priced at $80.) and the faster cpu solution doesnt. That
adds a lot of margin to get a faster MB, more than enough to
compensate for the board.
Not necessarily. The upgraded motherboard also
(Responding on-list so there's no flood of private responses. Considered
cross-posting to move the thread, but hoping it will just die on
-hackers.)
This topic would probably be better suited to freebsd-questions.
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Zac M. Speidel [EMAIL
* Eugene L. Vorokov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010702 10:19] wrote:
Hello,
can please someone enlighten me how can a module catch ip packets before
they actually enter the stack, the way ipfw or ipf does ? I tried to look
at the sources, but ipfw seems to do it some very specific way which
is
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:34:19PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
When you get a new struct file from falloc(), VFS has nothing to do with
it. As you can see from the streamsopen() code, you can change f_ops
(which by default points at badfileops) and f_data (defaults to zero) to
point at your
Couple of questions, and my apologies for repeating something that may
have been mentioned recently...
Are Filesystem ACL's something we can look forward to seeing in FreeBSD?
Also, is there a place I can view the progress and/or the current status
of the project? Finally, what does it take to
Brian Somers wrote:
The only strange occurrence I've seen that sounds even vaguely
similar is that if you leave out a nameserver line in
/compat/linux/etc/hosts, it *doesn't* default to 127.1.
Try adding a nameserver line (if you haven't already got one).
Thanks for the suggestion,
see www.trustedbsd.org especially the usenix paper.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Hough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 16:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Filesystem ACL's
snip
Are Filesystem ACL's something we can look forward to seeing
in FreeBSD?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Hough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Are Filesystem ACL's something we can look forward to seeing
in FreeBSD?
snip
* Yonatan Bokovza [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010702 13:05] wrote:
see www.trustedbsd.org especially the usenix paper.
Well FreeBSD 5 has
Nothing for sure yet, but AFAIK, a couple ideas presented at USENIX are
being considered.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Hough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 9:31 AM
Subject: Filesystem ACL's
Couple of questions, and my apologies for repeating
is there a /compat/linux/etc/resolv.conf?
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, John Toon wrote:
Brian Somers wrote:
The only strange occurrence I've seen that sounds even vaguely
similar is that if you leave out a nameserver line in
/compat/linux/etc/hosts, it *doesn't* default to 127.1.
Try
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
is there a /compat/linux/etc/resolv.conf?
At one stage you needed one as the linux binaries expected a different
format.
ppp updates the BSD one but not the Linux one..
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, John Toon wrote:
Brian Somers wrote:
The only
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:20:56PM -0400, Tom Gottheil wrote:
Nothing for sure yet, but AFAIK, a couple ideas presented at USENIX are
being considered.
POSIX.1e ACL support is present in -current.
--
Chris D. Faulhaber - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 1:31 PM + 7/2/01, Robert Hough wrote:
Couple of questions, and my apologies for repeating something
that may have been mentioned recently...
Are Filesystem ACL's something we can look forward to seeing
in FreeBSD? Also, is there a place I can view the progress
and/or the current status
In a message dated 07/02/2001 12:16:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are way off on your pricing. Way off. A 633 Celeron
is under 50. Q1 for petes sake. The cost difference would be less than
$20.
in quantity. It would be less than $80. Q1.
That's
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:08:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 07/02/2001 12:16:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are way off on your pricing. Way off. A 633 Celeron
is under 50. Q1 for petes sake. The cost difference would be less than
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
in fact, the require keyword isn't sufficient in it's own. there
should be pre_require and post_require keywords since nfsd needs to
start mountd before to start nfsd then rpc.statd and rpc.lockd have to
be started after nfsd.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 07:32:13PM +0400, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
Hello,
can please someone enlighten me how can a module catch ip packets before
they actually enter the stack, the way ipfw or ipf does ? I tried to look
at the sources, but ipfw seems to do it some very specific way which
FreeBSD warriors:
Steps I took to try to make a release.
Followed the FreeBSD FAQ about making a custom release:
supfile looks like this:
*default host=cvsup3.freebsd.org
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr/local/cvstree
*default release=cvs
I was reading handbook/contrib.html to find useful things to do today.
There's a mention about replacing explicit checks of cr_uid against
zero with calls to suser() or suser_xxx().
The following little script, was what I used to look for cr_uid
occurences.
#!/bin/sh
( find .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Entire PIII MBs are available for under $60. Your concept that the delta in
cost between a 486 chipset and PIII is more that that is utterly ridiculous
PIII chipsets and 486 chipsets cost the same in quantity. Try using a
resource other than your Radio Shack
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Andre Grosse Bley wrote:
Hello Hackers,
i think the tcp code in 4.3-RELEASE (and at least stable from last week) has
a serious bug in tcp handling:
I use LPRng 3.6.20 and openssh on the 4.3 box, lpd-server is on a 4.1 box.
Issuing 4-5 lpq's in a minute gives
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
I had similar problems with 4.3, my ssh and telnet sessions were giving
timeouts when they were inactive for about 2 hours (ofcourse this was
not an autologout or something). The problem was fixed when I downgraded
(for another reason) to 4.2.
I was looking at a bunch of bug reports, and quite a few pertain
to ftpd. Anyone thinking about going through and just cleaning it
up from head to toe? Not a complete rewrite or anything, but just
alot of straightening up. If no one is doing this now, I have no
problem attempting to tackle this.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:55:14PM -0400, Mike Wiacek wrote:
I was looking at a bunch of bug reports, and quite a few pertain
to ftpd. Anyone thinking about going through and just cleaning it
up from head to toe? Not a complete rewrite or anything, but just
alot of straightening up. If no one
Be aware that ftpd is likely to be replaced in the near future, as
there's a strong desire to converge on the LukeM FTP tools.
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:55:14PM -0400, Mike Wiacek wrote:
I was
41 matches
Mail list logo
