Why? Since localhost couldn't be resolved correctly, snmpd was trying to
match localhost.com when it created its in-memory ACL. You really should
fix your localhost resolution. This is what my host file looks like on
one of my marcuscom machines:
127.0.0.1 localhost.marcuscom.com localho
Stijn Hoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> I think everyone is qualified - user interface isn't about qualification,
> it just needs to be non-intrusive and easily accessible for everyone. [1]
Well, if it's not easily accessible to everyone, then it's clearly
failed. That's the easy part.
As for no
On 18-Sep-2001 Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > Does anyone know what version of XFree86 that is going to be released
> > with FreeBSD 4.4 this weekend??
>
> 3.3.6. We're still waiting for 4.0's "support footprint" to widen
> a bit more before subjecting people to it by default. Hopefully
> by 4.
Gavin Kenny wrote:
> Is there a CAN bus driver for FreeBSD?
I don't know of any such driver. I'm working on a home automation
project that uses CAN so I'll also be needing a driver at some point.
Most of the "CAN for a PC" devices I've seen convert the CAN data to
RS-232, so I'm not sure that wha
On 18-Sep-01 Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> No, 3.3.6. There is no such thing as 3.3.7 (at least not according to
> www.xfree86.org) and even if there were, enough version-number
> specifics are encoded into sysinstall that I would had to have been
> told at least a week or two ago if any such version
No, 3.3.6. There is no such thing as 3.3.7 (at least not according to
www.xfree86.org) and even if there were, enough version-number
specifics are encoded into sysinstall that I would had to have been
told at least a week or two ago if any such version number bump were
contemplated. :)
- Jordan
> Does anyone know what version of XFree86 that is going to be released
> with FreeBSD 4.4 this weekend??
3.3.6. We're still waiting for 4.0's "support footprint" to widen
a bit more before subjecting people to it by default. Hopefully
by 4.5.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
As many FreeBSD users know, a large set of changes was committed to
-current recently, as part of the development of real threading support.
Most parts of the kernel were changed to a greater or lesser extent.
Some parts have not been able to be tested fully however. If you have a
section of
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 05:15:07PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Ok so I have to ask... what is CAN bus? (besides a piece of string
> between 2 cans.).
CAN stands for Controller Area Network.
It's a fieldbus widely used in automation systems.
--
B.Walter COSMO-Project ht
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:45:36PM -0700, glenn gombert wrote:
> Does anyone know what version of XFree86 that is going to be released
> with FreeBSD 4.4 this weekend??
3.3.7.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
The Intel PRO/100 S Server Adapter contains the Intel 82550EY Fast
Ethernet controller
I am trying to find where i can find the chipset supported page.
For future reference. All i see on the main hardware compat page is
the make.if someone could point me to this page...would be most
apprecia
Does anyone know what version of XFree86 that is going to be released
with FreeBSD 4.4 this weekend??
Thanks,
Glenn G.
___
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http:
Ok so I have to ask... what is CAN bus? (besides a piece of string
between 2 cans.).
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, [iso-8859-1] Gavin Kenny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a CAN bus driver for FreeBSD?
>
> please cc me your answer
>
> many thanks
>
> Gavin
>
> ___
# sec.name source community
com2sec local 127.0.0.1 public
com2sec localrw 127.0.0.1 private
hehe now it works!
problem came from localhost that was not correctly resolved (but why?)
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chojin
#snmpwalk 127.0.0.1 public system
Timeout: No Response from 127.0.0.1
no success again...
but better to use 127.0.0.1 because :
#host localhost
localhost.com has address 63.231.68.113
localhost.com mail is handled (pri=10) by ghost.localhost.com
(even with bind killed)
/etc/hosts:
::1
You were completely right. I replaced the IDE cable and that fixed it.
Thankyou very much.
Dan.
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Frank Nobis wrote:
> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 13:03:00 +0200
> From: Frank Nobis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Stephen Hurd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL
Those look fine. What about nslookup localhost (or if you're using hosts
before bind, what does /etc/hosts look like)? It may be that localhost
resolves to something other than 127.0.0.1. Have you tried:
snmpwalk 127.0.0.1 public system
? That should also work.
Joe
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Cho
>I compiled /usr/ports/net/net-snmp
me too
#netstat -a
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state)
tcp4 0 0 tarakan.lan.tara.pop3 chojin.lan.tarak.1618 TIME_WAIT
tcp4 0 0 tarakan.lan.tara.pop3
What does netstat -a and ifconfig -a show? Something is not right on your
machine. I compiled /usr/ports/net/net-snmp and it worked out of the box.
I'm using the default /usr/local/etc/rc.d/snmpd.sh script to start snmpd.
Joe
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Chojin wrote:
> My default location is /usr/lo
My default location is /usr/local/share/snmp/snmpd.conf
I used your file (just modified for 192.168... lan).
To be sure snmpd uses the good file I used -c
#/usr/local/sbin/snmpd -c /usr/local/share/snmp/snmpd.conf
#ps aux | grep snmpd
root81374 7.2 0.4 3256 2624 p0 S12:25AM 0:00.15
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:47, you wrote:
> If "route get " shows an MTU of 576, "route delete
> " should clear it.
Yeah, that does it a treat.
Thanks,
Dave
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Not sure. I have snmpd 4.2.1 working perfectly on 4.3-RELEASE and
4.4-STABLE as of an hour ago. Attached is my entire config file. I keep
it in /usr/local/lib/snmp (which is the default location).
Joe
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Chojin wrote:
> I didn't resolved my problem.
> Even after upgraded to
I didn't resolved my problem.
Even after upgraded to 4.4-stable (because there was maybe a bug in snmpd
:-p).
I don't know what I could do.
- Original Message -
From: "Chojin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joe Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jean-Francois Dive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL P
signale interrupying 'free' is ok..
Free is not 'signal-safe' so no malloc/free can be done in a signal..
set the malloc config that catches recursive frees&malocs.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
> sshd died on one of our machines today. The traceback seems to
> indicate that
In the last episode (Sep 18), David Preece said:
> I tried this on -questions but to no avail. It strikes me as something that
> is either dead easy, or can't be done. Does anyone have any ideas?
If "route get " shows an MTU of 576, "route delete
" should clear it.
> I have a network consistin
Hi,
I tried this on -questions but to no avail. It strikes me as something that
is either dead easy, or can't be done. Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks,
Dave
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: MTU table?
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:40:35 +1200
From: David Preece <[EMAIL PROTEC
I forwarded the whole thing to Brian. We'll wait to see what he decides
to do. Obviously a fix like this needs to go, it's just a matter of who,
how, and when.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebs
* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010917 16:04] wrote:
>
> :
> :* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010917 15:32] wrote:
> :> sshd died on one of our machines today. The traceback seems to
> :> indicate that a signal is interrupting a free(). I'm going to
> :> play with the code a
:
:* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010917 15:32] wrote:
:> sshd died on one of our machines today. The traceback seems to
:> indicate that a signal is interrupting a free(). I'm going to
:> play with the code a bit to see if there's an easy fix.
:>
:> This bug can't occur
* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010917 15:32] wrote:
> sshd died on one of our machines today. The traceback seems to
> indicate that a signal is interrupting a free(). I'm going to
> play with the code a bit to see if there's an easy fix.
>
> This bug can't occur very ofte
Matt Dillon wrote:
> I looked at the code and there is definitely a serious issue. This
> proposed patch should solve the problem. Here it is for review before
> I commit it and send a bug report off to the openssh folks. I am testing
> it now.
If it is going into the vendor re
I looked at the code and there is definitely a serious issue. This
proposed patch should solve the problem. Here it is for review before
I commit it and send a bug report off to the openssh folks. I am testing
it now.
-Matt
Index
sshd died on one of our machines today. The traceback seems to
indicate that a signal is interrupting a free(). I'm going to
play with the code a bit to see if there's an easy fix.
This bug can't occur very often... the key regeneration signal
has to occur *just* as sshd i
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jason Andresen writes:
: Wilko Bulte wrote:
: >
: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:48:10AM +0100, Rasputin wrote:
: > > Thnaks a lot for the confirmation - for the record, I'm trying
: > > to replace a basestation, not communicate with one.
: > >
: > > But as long as Lu
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:43:54PM -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:48:10AM +0100, Rasputin wrote:
> > > Thnaks a lot for the confirmation - for the record, I'm trying
> > > to replace a basestation, not communicate with one.
> > >
> > > But as
Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:48:10AM +0100, Rasputin wrote:
> > Thnaks a lot for the confirmation - for the record, I'm trying
> > to replace a basestation, not communicate with one.
> >
> > But as long as Lucents are compatible, I 'll go for one of those..
> > (I only need W
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:48:10AM +0100, Rasputin wrote:
> * Jason Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010914 18:39]:
> > Brooks Davis wrote:
> > Aren't the airport cards just plain old Silver Lucent cards? If so,
> > then
> > either the Gold or the Silver should work fine.
> > In fact I know the si
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 10:06:27AM -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
> Samuel Greear wrote:
>
> >
> > The new changes suck, they've been annoying the hell out of me.
> > The first time I installed, as a Windows user, I found that everything
> > worked as I expected. At one point you just jumped int
Hi,
Is there a CAN bus driver for FreeBSD?
please cc me your answer
many thanks
Gavin
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
To Unsubscrib
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rasputin writes:
: I take it the PCI PCMCIA adapters are still unsupported?
: (on 4-STABLE)
I did a boatload of changes to -stable to make them work. While I
didn't test the PCI cards with the last set of code for the
4.4-RELEASE, they were working fairly well with
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:48:10AM +0100, Rasputin wrote:
> I take it the PCI PCMCIA adapters are still unsupported?
> (on 4-STABLE)
They should be working. That was one of the primary points of the work
Warner has been doing on PC Card.
-- Brooks
--
Any statement of the form "X is the one, t
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:06:27 -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
> You were definatly in the minority with this one.
Guys, guys, please!
So far, NOBODY has come forward with evidence of a serious survey.
If you can't present new evidence of such a survey conducted, you're
unlikely to change anythin
Samuel Greear wrote:
>
> The new changes suck, they've been annoying the hell out of me.
> The first time I installed, as a Windows user, I found that everything
> worked as I expected. At one point you just jumped into the menu,
> ran through it selecting things, and hit enter. It was cheeze
On Monday 17 September 2001 05:44 am, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Recently, libdialog's use of tab, space and enter seems to have changed.
> Now, space and enter mean the same thing. Before, enter was a
> context-insensitive short-cut to the currently selected dialogue
> "submit" but
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Somers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: Checking changes to listening ports in /etc/security
> I found a problem... if you reboot a machine, lots of diffs come up
> because of the PID column. I've got a versi
I found the following in one of my many mailboxes this morning.
I thought it was great and really wanted to share it with everyone!
Please, check out http://www.mp3.com/justjouett and play the song "Made In America"
It certainly made my day!
Thanks!
Jan
PS: What is stronger/better:
AWO (Amer
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:00:05PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:50:45 +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > IMHO, you just got used to it. Present the interface to a Windows user
> > who hasn't seen it before and watch them getting frustrated the third
> > time sysinstall asks 'Proc
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:50:45 +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> IMHO, you just got used to it. Present the interface to a Windows user
> who hasn't seen it before and watch them getting frustrated the third
> time sysinstall asks 'Proceed?' while they tried to select the disk they
> would be installing
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:44:20PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Recently, libdialog's use of tab, space and enter seems to have changed.
> Now, space and enter mean the same thing. Before, enter was a
> context-insensitive short-cut to the currently selected dialogue
> "submit" button.
Yes, and
Hi folks,
Recently, libdialog's use of tab, space and enter seems to have changed.
Now, space and enter mean the same thing. Before, enter was a
context-insensitive short-cut to the currently selected dialogue
"submit" button.
What many folks may not realize is that the new behaviour, while "s
* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010917 10:00]:
> Rasputin wrote:
> > Thnaks a lot for the confirmation - for the record, I'm trying
> > to replace a basestation, not communicate with one.
>
> The timing for access points requires different firmware; you
> can't do it in software alone.
>
>
> From: Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Checking changes to listening ports in /etc/security
> Date: Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:18:43PM +0100
>
> > I think the attached patch makes things slightly better. We only run
> > sockstat once, and remove the trailing whitespace that sockst
Tim Allshorn([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.09.17 10:40:15 +:
> Hello.
> I need to be able to run a particular program at the last minute of each
> month and yes I know it would be much easier to run it at the first minute
> of each month, but my hands are tied and my brain is too puny to work
Rasputin wrote:
> Thnaks a lot for the confirmation - for the record, I'm trying
> to replace a basestation, not communicate with one.
The timing for access points requires different firmware; you
can't do it in software alone.
Talk to Julian Elisher; he presented on a company that sells
a FreeB
* Jason Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010914 18:39]:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:30:37AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:02:03PM +0100, Rasputin wrote:
> > > > Is there any difference between Gold and Silver cards from
> > > > a compatibili
55 matches
Mail list logo
