PLEASE READ CAREFULLY
WARNING: This email is of an ADULT NATURE, if you are not over 18 years
old, you MUST DELETE this message as you are not the intended recipient.
http://213.180.33.225/spg/2/
FREE UNLIMITED ACCESS FOR 3 Days X
Hi
crontab -e as root and then, insert the following line:
*/10 * * * * /usr/sbin/arp -d IP.OF.DEF.GW
or the brutal version which deletes the entire arp-cache
*/10 * * * * /usr/sbin/arp -da
Stefan
Mike D wrote:
Stefan,
could you (if it's not too much hassle) mail me the details of
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Lamont Granquist wrote:
yeah, i really wish the installer had some fast-fsck newfs hints...
(at least i have an excuse for not offering any code, though, as i just
started a new job...)
I think that newfs was going to be changed to make 16K clusters with the
max CPG
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Miss Cleo wrote:
[top_urgent.gif]
Linus Torvalds, you must have friends in high places. I've been
authorized to issue you a Special Tarot Reading! You can learn about
important events concerning your future. It is vital that you call
immediately!
So, make this FREE
Title: Dear Sir or Madam:
Dear
Media Executive,
I
would like to speak to you regarding our new content management solution (CMS)
called the Oven - it has been specifically developed for
publishers. In a nutshell, if a company has extensive
content such as articles and media (jpgs,
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Bill Fenner wrote:
However, there does exist one case that have good checksum, no matter I
apply the patch or not.
Is the local system a member of one or the other of these groups?
i.e. does it work when the local system is a member, or not, or
is that not a
Ian Dowse wrote:
[ ... booting another OS that is either real mode or requires the
use of a real mode bootstrap, at FreeBSD shutdown ... ]
Yeah, I attempted something like this a few years ago without much
success. I've just updated the code to compile on -stable, and it
seems to
Hi
I want to load share between two ADSL modems using a NAT/Firewall.
Computer 1 \
\ /-- ADSL 1
\ /
Computer 2 -- Wireless LAN --- Firewall/NAT -
./
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 12:09:05AM +, Mike D wrote:
Could this have something to do with leases being renewed (by the isp dhcp
server and consequently the cable modem) and FreeBSD not updating routing
tables? (I'm guessing big time here - not an expert by any means)
I doubt it,
Hi,
I remember some discussions a while ago about adding statefulness to
the character device driver layer. What's the consensus now ? Is it going
to be added, and if so, when ?
Thanks,
David
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave R
ufino writes:
Hi,
I remember some discussions a while ago about adding statefulness to
the character device driver layer. What's the consensus now ? Is it going
to be added, and if so, when ?
Uhm, I don't hink I understand your question here...
--
Hi,
I decided to give Evolution a try. It seems that with large mail
folder (via Maildir or IMAP), the mail component dies (signal 6). I
notice the following:
Dec 7 09:24:56 madman /kernel: sigreturn: eflags = 0x246
Dec 7 09:24:56 madman /kernel: pid 56881 (evolution-mail), uid 1001:
Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
Hi,
I decided to give Evolution a try. It seems that with large mail
folder (via Maildir or IMAP), the mail component dies (signal 6). I
notice the following:
Dec 7 09:24:56 madman /kernel: sigreturn: eflags = 0x246
Dec 7 09:24:56 madman /kernel: pid
Anders Hagman wrote:
I want to load share between two ADSL modems using a NAT/Firewall.
Computer 1 \
\ /-- ADSL 1
\ /
Computer 2 -- Wireless LAN --- Firewall/NAT -
./
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:03:20AM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote:
Anders Hagman wrote:
I want to load share between two ADSL modems using a NAT/Firewall.
Computer 1 \
\ /-- ADSL 1
\ /
Computer 2
Steve Ames wrote:
I want to load share between two ADSL modems using a NAT/Firewall.
...
The ADSL are 500k links and I want to load share on session by session.
Can I do NAT between an inside interface and two outside interfaces
acting in a round robin fashion?
This may not be the good idea
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:21:33AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Nicolas Souchu wrote:
[...]
If only a part of the card memory is visible in physical memory,
Yes.
then you will have to do fault handling, as I first suggested.
FreeBSD doesn't support external pagers, per se. You might be
subscribe freebsd-hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
What would be nice would be to load balance on a per connection
basis, not a per packet basis, between the two modems.
Any ideas how to do this ?
Rick
Steve Ames wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:03:20AM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote:
Anders Hagman wrote:
I want to load share between two
rick norman wrote:
What would be nice would be to load balance on a per connection
basis, not a per packet basis, between the two modems.
Any ideas how to do this ?
Not with the current mechanisms in FreeBSD. You'd need a simple policy
routing engine (actually, policy forwarding). A
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Lars Eggert wrote:
Steve Ames wrote:
I want to load share between two ADSL modems using a NAT/Firewall.
...
The ADSL are 500k links and I want to load share on session by session.
Can I do NAT between an inside interface and two outside interfaces
acting in a
Lars Eggert writes:
Redundancy is a different issue from load-sharing.
If you want to switch between a primary and a backup link there are a
number of ways to do this.
It is interesting.
I am using net with static routing
in it (FreeBSD routers) and think
now about redundancy.
Point me
Nick Rogness wrote:
Load sharing is not possible on a per packet basis when running
NAT on the outside interfaces. The source address for each packet
will be different.
What prevents you from picking one source address for packets going out
both interfaces? Your return
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Lars Eggert wrote:
Nick Rogness wrote:
Load sharing is not possible on a per packet basis when running
NAT on the outside interfaces. The source address for each packet
will be different.
What prevents you from picking one source address for
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011207 07:57] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave R
ufino writes:
Hi,
I remember some discussions a while ago about adding statefulness to
the character device driver layer. What's the consensus now ? Is it going
to be added, and if so, when ?
Nick Rogness wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Lars Eggert wrote:
What prevents you from picking one source address for packets going
out both interfaces? Your return packets won't be striped then of
course. (Which could make this scheme ineffective, assuming client
machines receive much more than
If you were using PPPoE for the DSL, then you could
possibly use multilink ppp.
The trick would be to see if the ppp server at the other end
can recognise multilink PPP when it's getting it's ppp off ATM/PPPoE..
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Lars Eggert wrote:
rick norman wrote:
What would be
I'm going to answer these questions to provide another datapoint (even
though they are not addressed to me) because I have seen exactly the
same behavior with my cable modem:
Mike D wrote:
going out. I haven't checked for either packet drops / RTT increase
(how?) but when I say slow, I mean
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Lars Eggert wrote:
rick norman wrote:
What would be nice would be to load balance on a per connection
basis, not a per packet basis, between the two modems.
Any ideas how to do this ?
Not with the current mechanisms in FreeBSD. You'd need a simple policy
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Nick Rogness wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Lars Eggert wrote:
rick norman wrote:
What would be nice would be to load balance on a per connection
basis, not a per packet basis, between the two modems.
Any ideas how to do this ?
Not with the current
Please direct me to the right mailling list if this is out of scope...
I have just completed a new pam module (pam_vuser) for the intended
purpose of substituting real usernames for virtual username/passwords
typed in at login time. The module does the following:
1) End users attempt
Your first task would be to show that it is a generally useful
and expected behaviour to end up in a login with a different username to
that which you started out with.
If you can prove that there are other useful reasons to do this,
in addition to your own app, then certainly it would make
Hello,
I have a machine whose primary IDE controller is blown. Only the secondary
works. So, I connected my single IDe drive as the secondary master, and
proceeded to install FreeBSD.
The install went flawlessly. I installed with the FreeBSD boot manager(the
first choice on that screen of
rick norman wrote:
What would be nice would be to load balance on a per connection
basis, not a per packet basis, between the two modems.
Any ideas how to do this ?
This whole thread is a bit odd, in that the DSL lines in question
are going to go back to the same DSLAM, and therefore end up
Hi,
I'm having a problem with pthread_create failing with a custom kernel
(problem doesn't happen with GENERIC). If I use a null pthread_attr_t arg,
pthread_create returns EAGAIN. If feed it a pthread_attr_tag, then
lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_create.c: pthread_create() panics.
After noising
* Jesse Granden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011207 20:32] wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a problem with pthread_create failing with a custom kernel
(problem doesn't happen with GENERIC). If I use a null pthread_attr_t arg,
pthread_create returns EAGAIN. If feed it a pthread_attr_tag, then
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Barcroft writes:
: 386 support has been removed from -CURRENT. -CURRENT also doesn't
: support 486SX's out of the box, one is required to load a kernel
: module from the loader if they need FPU emulation.
I assume
On Friday 07 December 2001 21:19, Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jesse Granden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011207 20:32] wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a problem with pthread_create failing with a custom kernel
(problem doesn't happen with GENERIC). If I use a null pthread_attr_t
arg,
* Jesse Granden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011207 21:47] wrote:
Here's my kernel conf file, mostly stripped of comments...
I think you should sort the VM related lines into a single section then
perform a binary search by eliminating half of them at a time to figure
out how you're breaking things.
On Friday 07 December 2001 21:54, Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you should sort the VM related lines into a single section then
perform a binary search by eliminating half of them at a time to figure
out how you're breaking things.
-Alfred
Good Advice! here's the cause:
Hello,
I am new to FreeBSD and am attempting to write a device driver for a
Computer Telephony card, that uses the PLX9050 bridge chip.
I started with the KLD sample in section 22.1 of the FreeBSD Developers
Handbook. However, when I install this driver with kldload, the probe
function doesnt
I have an interface that dies and its running
IPFIREWALL
IPDIVERT
options in the kernel and the external interface dies the machine becomes
unstable and reboots well sometimes other times you have to follow the
emergency shutdown procedure it does when that system has become unstable.
its a
Latest data point here: this time it was fixed mysteriously.
After noticing it was down, netstat -m showed no serious mbuf
use or peak use. ep0 had:
ep0: flags=cc43UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,OACTIVE,SIMPLEX,LINK2,MULTICAST mtu 1500
and the IP address was set up correctly
tcpdump -n -i ep0
43 matches
Mail list logo
