Re: Routing Socket and New Addresses

2002-01-27 Thread Andrew
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Andrew wrote: configured I get a RTM_NEWADDR message. The bit I'm confused with is the struct sockaddr associated with RTA_IFA (that I assumed would hold the IP of the interface) has an sa_family value of AF_IMPLINK. If I cast it to a struct sockaddr_in then s_addr is

Re: PAM, setusercontext, kdm and ports/32273

2002-01-27 Thread Scott Mitchell
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 04:52:03PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: Scott Mitchell wrote: However, this got me thinking -- is the right solution here to have a PAM module that does the setusercontext(), so programs that already know about PAM will just work, without needing to know about

Re: PAM, setusercontext, kdm and ports/32273

2002-01-27 Thread Terry Lambert
Scott Mitchell wrote: However, this got me thinking -- is the right solution here to have a PAM module that does the setusercontext(), so programs that already know about PAM will just work, without needing to know about setusercontext() as well? I can see that causing problems with

Re: Routing Socket and New Addresses

2002-01-27 Thread Andrew
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Andrew wrote: but it seems that if I don't read the packet with one read call then the packet is lost. Is this correct behaviour? I guess if the buffer is small Well it seems that if you dont get the entire packet in one read it is lost forever. It also seems that no

(Fwd) ip_output() does not checksum outer header

2002-01-27 Thread Dan Langille
I am forwarding this on behalf of Bruce (his DNS is borked and thus he cannot send to the lists). Please don't CC me in the replies, only Bruce. Thanks. --- Forwarded message follows --- Date sent: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:35:38 + From: Bruce M Simpson

Re: PAM, setusercontext, kdm and ports/32273

2002-01-27 Thread Scott Mitchell
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 04:20:30AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: Scott Mitchell wrote: OK, but could you explain *why* you think it's a bad idea? It adds a side effect that wasn't there before in order to work around an improper usage of an interface. It adds some additional, optional

Re: Routing Socket and New Addresses

2002-01-27 Thread Justin C . Walker
On Sunday, January 27, 2002, at 08:03 AM, Andrew wrote: On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Andrew wrote: but it seems that if I don't read the packet with one read call then the packet is lost. Is this correct behaviour? I guess if the buffer is small Well it seems that if you dont get the entire

Re: PAM, setusercontext, kdm and ports/32273

2002-01-27 Thread Volker Stolz
In local.freebsd-hackers, you wrote: I'll accept that there might be bad interactions between PAM and setusercontext() that I haven't considered. I'm not familiar enough with PAM to know what those would be. For example you have to think about which flags to pass to setusercontext() and when

Re: Reading BIOS from userland

2002-01-27 Thread Ronald G Minnich
A stupid little program you can use to dump the bios and hunt for version strings etc. default is to mmap the last 1MB of the 32-bit space and write it to fildes 1. optional arg 1 is the base (it gets 16 thanks to a strtol bug that may no longer be there); optional arg 2 is the size. Tested on

shell scripts that hang around forever

2002-01-27 Thread Dan Langille
Folks: have a look at this FreshPorts shell script and let me know if there is a better way to do this. This script waits for a file to arrive in a directory, then runs a scipt to process it. It's part of FreshPorts. the procmail script spools the incoming cvs-all message to a temporary

Re: shell scripts that hang around forever

2002-01-27 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 27), Dan Langille said: Folks: have a look at this FreshPorts shell script and let me know if there is a better way to do this. Apart from maybe using echo instead of forking 'ls', and caching the list: while : ; do FILES=`echo *` if [ $FILES != * ] ; then

Re: shell scripts that hang around forever

2002-01-27 Thread Dan Langille
On 27 Jan 2002 at 20:18, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Jan 27), Dan Langille said: Folks: have a look at this FreshPorts shell script and let me know if there is a better way to do this. Apart from maybe using echo instead of forking 'ls', and caching the list: while : ; do