[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While i understand the mechanism of hardware interrupt priority,
I am curious to know how the priority levels are achieved/implemented
for software ( in particular the various layers of the TCP/IP stack..
splxxx() ).
Stevens Volume 2 is the canonical reference.
It seems Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Søren Schmidt wrote:
... However the Serverworks ROSB4 chips is not one I
would recommend using, if you need serious ATA support on
such a board, install a Promise TX2 or later or a HPT370 or later ...
I think I've also seen you post that the Highpoint is
1) Easy to write a very minimal, outside the stack, IP/UDP layer.
One (very nasty) already exists in libstand. There was a very small
TCP/IP stack mentioned on /. the other day; it looked close to ideal for
this application.
--
To announce that there must be no criticism of the president,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 01:57:50 -0800
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eugene Panchenko wrote:
gretings.
As seen on kerneltrap.org:
---
Andrew Morton: Ingo Molnar broke the ground here with
his
2.2.12 patch which demonstrated that Linux could fairly
easily yield task
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 01:59:57 -0800
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not enough information to answer the questions, and the
original posting referenced doesn't seem to be there
any more, anyway.
Actually, it is there, but pushed down by some newer stuff.
I used search link to retrieve
The memory stick will also have partitions... so try
$fdisk afd0
to show up the table
maybe a
mount -t msdos /dev/afd0s1 /mnt/sony
does it
Jan
--
Kneel and deliver!
-- Casanunda, the worlds smallest lover turns highwaydwarf
(Terry Pratchett, Lords and Ladies)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:32:55AM +0500, Dmitry A. Bondareff wrote:
Hi!
I'll try again:
who can say me why system not using my /etc/rc.conf ?
What exactly is your system not doing? You mentioned something about
'more' - are you referring to more(1), or something else?
You only told us how
In a message written on Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:19:01PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
Not necessarily. The client is free, and in the ports tree. That
includes the server with an evaluation license, which limits it to two
clients and two users. Perforce offers Open Source software projects
free
Justin C.Walker writes:
On Wednesday, February 20, 2002, at 04:52 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
yes but we might as well be protocol compatible if possible :-)
If only to re-use what they did in gdb :-)
The Darwin/Mac OS X scheme only deals with IOKit because that's where
the
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 12:31:53AM +, Tony Finch wrote:
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can suggest using a netgraph module for the work as it can be connected
to a netgraph ksocket node to receive the requests (jdp made all the
changes needed to allow this to be done).
Hi,
I get
# fdisk afd0
*** Working on device /dev/afd0 ***
parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are:
cylinders=0 heads=4 sectors/track=16 (64 blks/cyl)
parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are:
cylinders=0 heads=4 sectors/track=16 (64 blks/cyl)
fdisk: invalid fdisk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 10:01:19AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:32:55AM +0500, Dmitry A. Bondareff wrote:
Hi!
I'll try again:
who can say me why system not using my /etc/rc.conf ?
What exactly is your system not doing? You mentioned something about
'more'
This is cool.
As people talk about this it seems that more and more of the needed parts
are already available from one source or another..
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Michael Smith wrote:
1) Easy to write a very minimal, outside the stack, IP/UDP layer.
One (very nasty) already exists in
Julian Elischer wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Michael Smith wrote:
There was a very small TCP/IP stack mentioned on /. the other day; it
looked close to ideal for this application.
though I think it is probably better to use a UDP transport rther than
TCP it would be worth checking it out
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Michael Smith wrote:
There was a very small TCP/IP stack mentioned on /. the other day; it
looked close to ideal for this application.
though I think it is probably better to use a UDP transport rther
Ok, so now George has so many choices to choose from
that I'm expecting 3 different implementations from him, with no common
components :-)
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Benedikt Schmidt wrote:
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Michael Smith wrote:
Benedikt Schmidt wrote:
Look at http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/29/2115210mode=thread.
The TCP/IP stack mentioned in this article can be found at
http://dunkels.com/adam/uip/ and is licensed under the 4-clause BSD
license.
Thank you.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
The Apple darwin site is:
http://www.opensource.apple.com
I've not looked through the source for this, so you may have to inquire
on the darwin-development mailing list for pointers into the source
repository.
Regards,
Justin
On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 07:48 AM, Andrew Gallatin
Ok, so now George has so many choices to choose from
that I'm expecting 3 different implementations from him, with no common
components :-)
That's my exact plan, how did you know?
Actually this has all been pretty helpful, and I'll be considering the
options and playing as soon as I get that
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 06:09, Andrew Thompson wrote:
fdisk: invalid fdisk partition table found
fdisk: /boot/mbr: length must be a multiple of sector size
And I get the a few lines of afd0: PREVENT_ALLOW - ILLEGAL REQUEST
asc=24 ascq=00 error=00 in my dmesg.
Personally I'd say that is
I'm seeing a strange problem on 5.0 (c. Feb 19).
It seem everything that uses the Imlib library (/usr/ports/graphics/imlib)
dumps core with a SIGBUS when starting up. When I try to use gdb,
I see that it is not even getting to main() before crashing. Has
anyone seen anything like this before?
Imlib depends on libpng and binutils in -CURRENT contain a bug
which causes ld to create invalid shared library image for
libpng.so.5. The problem has been discussed already, see
PR ports/34908 for the patch.
Curiously, none of the messages from the PR audit trail
made it to my mailbox since I
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 10:00:04AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Disk IO can't be done in a non-blocking manner. If the kernel doesn't
have the portion of the file you wish to read in the buffer cache
then the process will block waiting.
Isn't this exactly what the kqueue mechanism
At 21.2.2002, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:19:01PM -0600, Mike Meyer
wrote:
Not necessarily. The client is free, and in the ports tree. That
includes the server with an evaluation license, which limits it to two
clients and two users. Perforce offers
24 matches
Mail list logo
