On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Your NTP servers are better.
I tested a III Plus, and without a 1 PPS source (which that model
doesn't provide) it's accurate to about 100ms, give or take. Since
real NTP servers are 1ms, they really aren't that good. It's
not that the time
On 30 Mär, Terry Lambert wrote:
/usr/include/stdlib.h, line 57: error: invalid combination of type specifiers
typedef _BSD_WCHAR_T_ wchar_t;
This seems to be a problem with the wchar_t being intrinsic,
and defined anyway for the compiler.
So we just have to #if !defined(__ICC)
On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Your NTP servers are better.
I tested a III Plus, and without a 1 PPS source (which that model
doesn't provide) it's accurate to about 100ms, give or take. Since
real NTP servers are 1ms, they
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 10:44:55AM -0600, Paul Halliday wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Your NTP servers are better.
I tested a III Plus, and without a 1 PPS source (which that model
doesn't provide) it's accurate to
I know Martin Blapp is working on getting the native
port of OpenOffice into the ports collections. Until
he is finished, people can get a glimpse of OpenOffice
by installing the Linux version. OpenOffice build
641d appears to work fairly well. It loaded some
complicated Word, Excel, and
On 31 Mär, I wrote:
/usr/include/stdlib.h, line 57: error: invalid combination of type specifiers
typedef _BSD_WCHAR_T_ wchar_t;
This seems to be a problem with the wchar_t being intrinsic,
and defined anyway for the compiler.
So we just have to #if !defined(__ICC) it? Hmm, I
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:21:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
But if system calls aren't preempted under what circumstances can a
process hold a vnode lock and then be usurped for processor?
While sleeping for IO.
Ideal systems release and reacquire locks
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 03:01:04PM +1100, Andrew wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Eric Melville wrote:
staralfur% sysctl kern.osrevision
kern.osrevision = 199506
snip
I couldn't tell you what it means, though.
That both OSs are based on 4.4BSD-Lite2 I believe.
Andrew
Well
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Halliday [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I just connected my gps (garmin gps III plus) to my serial port
: and realized that simply cat'ing cua0 displays date/time/position of the
: unit. (neato). Anyway, how accurate would it be to use the time
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simon 'corecode' Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: hi hackers!
:
: i'm in progress in writing a c++ program utilizing bsd.prog.mk
:
: i wondered why my programs won't link correctly when i don't add a line
: LDFLAGS=-lstdc++
: no i was trying out
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leo Bicknell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: In a message written on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 06:04:11PM -0600, Paul Halliday wrote:
: I just connected my gps (garmin gps III plus) to my serial port
: and realized that simply cat'ing cua0 displays
On Sun, 31 Mar 2002 19:52:21 +0200 (CEST) Alexander Leidinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 Mär, I wrote:
/usr/include/stdlib.h, line 57: error: invalid combination of type specifiers
typedef _BSD_WCHAR_T_ wchar_t;
This seems to be a problem with the wchar_t being
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Halliday [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: This is the answer I was kinda hoping for. I think that accuracy
: to ~100ms from a known source is a little more comforting than 1ms from a
: server that I have no control over. I am not maintaining a space
Why wouldn't time from a local GPS receiver constitute good time? Provided
the receiver is configured properly and acquires reference satellites fairly
regularly, this should provide almost the best possible time. For LBS, the
norm is to acquire three primary satellites and an additional
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:21:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
But if system calls aren't preempted under what circumstances can a
process hold a vnode lock and then be usurped for processor?
While sleeping for IO.
Ideal systems
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
---snip---
(7) netchild@ttyp1 % LD_PRELOAD= icc -c test.cc
test.cc:
/usr/local/intel/compiler50/ia32/include/cwchar, line 16: error: the
global scope has no tm
using ::mbstate_t; using ::size_t; using ::tm; using ::wint_t;
[ ... ]
These are complaining about
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
icc -I./include -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-portbld-freebsd5.0/
3.0.4/include/g++ -I /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-portbld-freebsd5.0/3.0.4/inclu
de/g++/i386-portbld-freebsd5.0 -c e.cc
e.cc:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 01:34:02PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Halliday [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: This is the answer I was kinda hoping for. I think that accuracy
: to ~100ms from a known source is a little
On Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:01:00 -0800 Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
icc -I./include -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-portbld-freebsd5.0/
3.0.4/include/g++ -I /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-portbld-freebsd5.0/3.0.4/inclu
Vladimir Egorin wrote:
Also keep in mind that the US governement reserves the right to turn
off GPS at any time to selected regions of the globe.
Hopefully European GPS project (Galileo) will provide an alternative.
It still has a long way to go though.
Galileo strikes me
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
Alternately, you could ensure ordering... by reordering the source
code. This seems like a poor idea, but it what Linux did implicitly,
I think. 8-(.
first of all i'm taking this as an aprils fool (no offence if it was
none) ;]
It wasn't a joke.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully European GPS project (Galileo) will provide an alternative.
It still has a long way to go though.
Galileo strikes me as unnecessary, unless the receivers will be
cheaper to get the same resolution. The 1 meter resolution seems
a little poor,
22 matches
Mail list logo
