Re: 0xdeadxxxx ?

2002-06-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Arun Sharma wrote: I just got a kernel mode page fault. I'd like to find out more about fault virtual address = 0xdeadc162 It looks like the address is meant to signal a particular class of error. Which one ? 0xdeadc162 - 0xdeadc0de = 0x0084 = 132 decimal Look for a short value

Re: signals and applications

2002-06-10 Thread Terry Lambert
tyler spivey wrote: ok - I hope I can get an answer: how come (under linux) i can use my favourite web browser and hit ^c (interrupt) and it will interrupt any network application, but under FreeBSD there are some operations that can't be interupted and just wait there? Your application is

Cardreaders and touchscreens?

2002-06-10 Thread Philip Paeps
Hi there - One of my clients would like me to hack together an application involving a cardreader and a touchscreen. How would I deal with these two rather 'odd' pieces of hardware. I didn't have any say in the purchasing of the touchscreen, but I suppose that shouldn't give me any trouble?

Re: Numerous hard hangs on TWO different ASUS P4T-E w/P4 1.6G

2002-06-10 Thread Holger Kipp
Frank Mayhar wrote: I'm experiencing hangs as well. At first I thought it was the fxp0/sym driver thing, but I've since changed hardware almost completely and the hangs persis. I'm now strongly suspecting some kind of interrupt problem. For the record, I've attached my dmesg output. This

kernel thread

2002-06-10 Thread Ferruccio Vitale
Hi, how can I destroy a kernel thread that I previously created? Regards, Ferruccio To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

Çѹ¹Õé¤Ø³´ÙáÅÊØ¢ÀÒ¾áÅéÇËÃ×ÍÂѧ

2002-06-10 Thread foodforhealth
á¹Ð¹Óâ»Ãá¡ÃÁ¤Çº¤ØÁ¹éÓ˹ѡ à¾ÔèÁ¹éÓ˹ѡ ÃÑ¡ÉÒÊØ¢ÀÒ¾ ¤Ø³ËÃ×ͤ¹·Õè¤Ø³ÃÑ¡¡ÓÅѧÁͧËÒÇÔ¸Õ´ÙáÅÊØ¢ÀÒ¾·Õèà»ç¹¸ÃÃÁªÒµÔÍÂÙèãªèäËÁ? ËÒ¡¤Ø³àº×èÍ˹èÒ¡Ѻ¤ÇÒÁ¾ÂÒÂÒÁ·ÕèäÁè»ÃÐʺ¤ÇÒÁÊÓàÃ稤ÃÑé§áÅéǤÃÑé§àÅèÒ ã¹¡ÒôÙáÅÊØ¢ÀÒ¾à¾×èÍÃÙ»ÃèÒ§·Õè´Õ àÃÒÁÕâ»Ãá¡ÃÁâÀª¹Ò¡ÒÃà¾×èÍÊØ¢ÀÒ¾ ·ÕèªèǤسä´é ÊÓËÃѺ¼Ùé·ÕèÁջѭËÒ

Re: kernel thread

2002-06-10 Thread Andy Sporner
My fault. I am using 5.0 Try this: man shutdown_kproc There was some name changes as shown: HISTORY The kproc_start() function first appeared in FreeBSD 2.2. The kproc_shutdown(), kthread_create(), kthread_exit(), kthread_resume(), kthread_suspend(), and

Re: kernel thread

2002-06-10 Thread Ferruccio Vitale
Andy Sporner wrote: man ktread_shutdown To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message I can't find any man pages about it; I searched on the net, grep'ed /usr/src entirely but any results. I've freebsd 4.6RC release. Any advice?

Re: 0xdeadxxxx ?

2002-06-10 Thread Arun Sharma
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:40:09PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: 0xdeadc162 - 0xdeadc0de = 0x0084 = 132 decimal Look for a short value that's getting set to 132. As I said in another email, I think this is td1-td_priority in kern_mutex.c:510. -Arun To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: kernel thread

2002-06-10 Thread Hiten Pandya
--- Andy Sporner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My fault. I am using 5.0 man shutdown_kproc Ok, I cant find any man page called shutdown_kproc in either 4.3 or 4.4. Anyway, he wants to destroy a thread, and not an internal daemon/process. To destroy a kernel thread, you need to make use of the

interaction between wait(2), ptrace(2), and rfork(2) with flags |= RFLINUXTHPN

2002-06-10 Thread Peter Edwards
Hi, kern_exit.c:wait1() has the following lines in -STABLE: if ((p-p_sigparent != SIGCHLD) ^ ((uap-options WLINUXCLONE) != 0)) continue; As it is, if you ptrace(PT_ATTACH) to a process started with rfork(flags|RFLINUXTHPN), and do a waitpid() as you normally would, this causes

Re: raidframe

2002-06-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:18:40PM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: If you really want to play with RAIDframe I'd guess you'll have a much easier time of it under NetBSD, where it is included with the operating system. Getting it working under FreeBSD could be a lot of fun and you might

Re: raidframe

2002-06-10 Thread Terry Lambert
David O'Brien wrote: You quite speak for yourself. I've seen the FreeBSD community more split 50%-50% in their love-hate of Vinum. Many of us still use ccd(4) because Vinum did not meet our needs. Alfred Perlsteing claims Vinum comes from the universe where Spock has a beard (sorry, Greg!).

kernel booting diff between boot2 and loader

2002-06-10 Thread Mark Santcroos
I wonder what is different in booting the kernel from loader(8) and from boot2. In vmware2 I am not able to boot the kernel from boot2, it hangs after loading the kernelfile. Using loader it goes fine. I tried current,stable and generic kernels, all without luck. This was not really a problem,