On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, neologism wrote:
> I really dislike the way 4.6 handles mta/sendmail in its starting rc scripts
> Why don't we have something as "mta_enable" which enables mta configuring in
> its own rc.$mta_name?
It already does. You want to put an on/off switch on mta_start_script? If
yo
Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 28 Jul 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > ad_attach() is trying to dereference atadev->param, which is NULL.
> Is there any other info I can provide? I'll drive, you steer. :)
No, this is Søren's cup of tea, which is why I Cc:ed him.
DES
--
On 28 Jul 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > (kgdb) p *atadev
> > $4 = {channel = 0xc075b600, unit = 16, name = 0xc04503b0 "ad1", param = 0x0,
> > driver = 0x0, flags = 0, mode = 0, cmd = 0, result = 0x0}
>
> ad_attach() is trying to dereference atadev->param, which is NULL.
Is there any oth
Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (kgdb) up 11
> #11 0xc013e8a5 in ad_attach (atadev=0xc075b650) at ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:124
> 124 adp->heads = atadev->param->heads;
>
> (kgdb) p adp
> $2 = (struct ad_softc *) 0x68c040
> (kgdb) p atadev
> $3 = (struct ata_device *) 0xc07
* neologism <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020728 10:08]:
> I mean something like this:
>
> case ${mta_enable} in
> [Yy][Ee][Ss])
> if [ -r ${mta_start_script} ]; then
> sh ${mta_start_script}# eventually + ${mta_configuration}
> fi
&g
Hi
I really dislike the way 4.6 handles mta/sendmail in its starting rc scripts
Why don't we have something as "mta_enable" which enables mta configuring in
its own rc.$mta_name?
I mean something like this:
case ${mta_enable} in
[Yy][Ee][Ss])
if [ -r ${mta_start_script} ]; then
6 matches
Mail list logo
