Re: very minor vm_map.c typo ?

2002-08-02 Thread Peter Wemm
Dominic Marks wrote: > Hello, > > In vm_map.c, in the vm_map_insert(...) function there is the following > piece of code which checks if the addresses supplied to the function are > valid: > > ** > if ((start < map->min_offset) || (end > map->max_offset) || > (start >= end)) > retu

very minor vm_map.c typo ?

2002-08-02 Thread Dominic Marks
Hello, In vm_map.c, in the vm_map_insert(...) function there is the following piece of code which checks if the addresses supplied to the function are valid: ** if ((start < map->min_offset) || (end > map->max_offset) || (start >= end)) return (KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS); ** Specif

Pet Health Plan!

2002-08-02 Thread www.americanpetplan.com
Title: Email   This offer is brought to you by the American Pet Plan.com.  If you no longer wish to receive offers in the future, please unsubscribe below.  If you cannot view this email, please click here: www.americanpetplan.com

Re: -fomit-frame-pointer for the world build

2002-08-02 Thread Bakul Shah
> I tried to build some binaries with -fomit..., then tried to debug it a > bit, and gdb shows me both backtrace stack and arguments, so I was in > doubt a bit -- so here is my question ;-) I can answer that. Consider the following two functions: f(int n) { int x; int y; ...

Re: -fomit-frame-pointer for the world build

2002-08-02 Thread Terry Lambert
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: [ ... -fomit-frame-pointer ... ] > Yes, Terry, I'd read this note. However, it does not clarify for me which > exactly functionality is lost with omitting this. > > I tried to build some binaries with -fomit..., then tried to debug it a > bit, and gdb shows me both backtr

Re: -fomit-frame-pointer for the world build

2002-08-02 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: TL> > What are the drawbacks of building FreeBSD with -fomit-frame-pointer? As TL> > far as I can see, it saves both space (which is not as worth as disk space TL> > got cheaper and cheaper) and execution time (which is, AFAICC, more TL> > important). TL>

Re: -fomit-frame-pointer for the world build

2002-08-02 Thread Terry Lambert
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > What are the drawbacks of building FreeBSD with -fomit-frame-pointer? As > far as I can see, it saves both space (which is not as worth as disk space > got cheaper and cheaper) and execution time (which is, AFAICC, more > important). > > I'd already done some tests, but

-fomit-frame-pointer for the world build

2002-08-02 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
Hello there colleagues, I'd tried to search thru the web, but did not succeed enough. What are the drawbacks of building FreeBSD with -fomit-frame-pointer? As far as I can see, it saves both space (which is not as worth as disk space got cheaper and cheaper) and execution time (which is, AFAICC,

mounting root

2002-08-02 Thread Pieter Danhieux
Why does the kernel still tries to mount root from fd0c first when i set options ROOTDEVNAME=\"cd9660:acd0\" ? And when fd0c fails, THEN he mounts it from acd0. thx for any help -- www.bsdaemon.be - securax.org - docs.bsdaemon.be keyserver: pgpkeys.mit.edu PGP keyID: DA07EAE9 signatur