On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Matt wrote:
> any chance going more than 4G?
Not yet. (on x86)
The hardware changes to do > 32 bit physical addresses
include a redefinition of how page tables and page directories are layed
out and to be able to use it we'd have to define
and turn on code for that differn
Matt wrote:
> Anyone knows the max physical mem that can be used with FreeBSD4.3?
2G on Alpha.
4G on Intel, if you tune your kernel and modify your KVA size to 3G.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
any chance going more than 4G?
Best Regards
Matt
http://www.xgforce.com/product.html
The Next Generation Server Clustering and
Clustered Enterprise SQL database, and
Firewall/VPN Solutions.
- Original M
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Matt wrote:
> Anyone knows the max physical mem that can be used with FreeBSD4.3?
Well, we have 4GB in a 4.6.2 system, and I think that we ran 4.3 on those
systems for a while.
However, you lose anywhere between 128M and 512M because of the PCI
address space.
Regards
Anyone knows the max physical mem that can be used with FreeBSD4.3?
Thanks in advance
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Reminder that the deadline for status report submissions is rapidly
approaching. Please follow the directions below to submit a FreeBSD
development status report.
Thanks,
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 03:14:01AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:05:29AM +0300, Oleg Sharoiko wrote:
> > >
> > > you could use send-pr to make the proposed patch visible in the
> > > bug tracking databas
I sent this to freebsd-questions a few minutes ago.. if anyone here can
help too I'd really be indebted :-)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Avleen Vig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:56:36 + (GMT)
Subject: Panic: ffs_clusteralloc: map mismatch
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 03:14:01AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:05:29AM +0300, Oleg Sharoiko wrote:
> >
> > you could use send-pr to make the proposed patch visible in the
> > bug tracking database
>
>
> Submit it to the PR database.
>
> It can
On Sun, 27-Oct-2002 at 09:12:33 -0800, David Nicholas Kayal wrote:
> I'm looking for a 5 volt signal.
>
> I have wires plugged into pins 2 and 25 of the parallel port.
>
> I have written a small program:
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> int fd;
> while(1)
> {
>
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:05:29AM +0300, Oleg Sharoiko wrote:
>
> you could use send-pr to make the proposed patch visible in the
> bug tracking database
Submit it to the PR database.
It can get in line behind the other almost 3000 open PR's, 65% of
which are ports, 30% of
This e-mail was scanned by Antivirus!
http://www.kssgm.gov.tr
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Hi people,
did anybody use it with FreeBSD 4.5? The problem is that the system
doesn't see it, however 'nge' and 'miibus' support are included into the
kernel. Is it correct that it must be 'nge', because as described in
the man page, only DGE-500T card is supported by nge, however both
DGE-550T a
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:05:29AM +0300, Oleg Sharoiko wrote:
you could use send-pr to make the proposed patch visible in the
bug tracking database
Wilko
> Hello!
>
> We've updated dgb driver so that it doesn't 'use old compatibility schemes'
> I think this update is worth being included int
Hello!
We've updated dgb driver so that it doesn't 'use old compatibility schemes'
I think this update is worth being included into source tree. Should I send it
to the list or there is now another way of submitting updates?
--
Oleg Sharoiko.
Software and Network Engineer
Computer Center of Rost
15 matches
Mail list logo
