Hi,
${subject} seems not to work on -current. First of all 'man kernbb' tells
me to compile at least one kernel file with '-a'. Well, gcc tells me that
it doesn't know anything about '-a'. After some grepping in the gcc
sources I came to the conclusion, that -fprofile-arcs is what it wants.
But
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Harti Brandt wri
tes:
${subject} seems not to work on -current. First of all 'man kernbb' tells
me to compile at least one kernel file with '-a'. Well, gcc tells me that
it doesn't know anything about '-a'. After some grepping in the gcc
sources I came to the
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 06:02:30PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Most of the BSS is mmapped zero pages that are copy-on-write, so in simple
programs they should be mostly shared. See rtld-elf/map_object.c
Once those pages are written to, the kernel
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 22:13, Ryan Sommers wrote:
My question is could I keep and build the CURRENT source tree on the
FreeBSD desktop, mount it over NFS to the laptop, and install it over
the NFS mount?
Is the kernel on the 5.0SP2 ISO built with PCCard support? I installed
from CD-ROM onto a
Hi FreeBSD lovers
I can't remember if I'm on the list, so please CC to me.
I used to program in C++ and assembly under windows, but now I only run
FreeBSD (4.7).
I have to get used to not playing with BIOS interrupts and direct hardware
accessing, but I'll live.
My questions are:
1. Can you guide
On 2002.11.21 17:54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't remember if I'm on the list, so please CC to me.
Just found out I'm on the list :-)
br
socketd
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On 2002.11.21 18:00 Bruce M Simpson wrote:
One big question I'd have is, why are you using assembly language?
1. I like assembly
2. FreeBSD will still need assembly programms
3. To learn more about the FreeBSD kernel (internals)
I do however program in C++, so if you are worried about
On 2002.11.21 18:33 Chuck Tuffli wrote:
There is
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/x86.html
I'm not sure if this is the same as the above link
I'll read it, thanks :-)
br
socketd
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On 2002.11.21 18:33 Chuck Tuffli wrote:
My questions are:
1. Can you guide my to some good info on asm programming under
FreeBSD (I
have read www.int80h.org/bsdasm)
There is
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/x86.html
I'm not sure if this is the same
Are there compelling reasons not to change the socket buffer
timeout to a u_long from a u_short? This variable stores
the number of ticks before the socket operation times out.
At present, the maximum SO_RCVTIMEO or SO_SNDTIMEO value one
can set is SHRT_MAX / hz. With a 100Hz kernel, this comes
Hi list
I am trying to sort out a problem with a set up for a client. I have
2 PC's with 8 port serial cards in them and they work fine under
freebsd. At present I have the 8 ports connected to ports in
/etc/services and I can telnet to these ports OK. The idea is I
want to push serial data in a
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, David G. Andersen wrote:
Are there compelling reasons not to change the socket buffer
timeout to a u_long from a u_short? This variable stores
the number of ticks before the socket operation times out.
At present, the maximum SO_RCVTIMEO or SO_SNDTIMEO value one
can
use netgraph...
The ng_tty node connects directly to a tty port
that can be connected directly to a ng_ksocket node
that can be bound to a udp port and address of another
ksocket node somewhere else, which is attached to a
ng-tty node there..
Anything coming in one port will be bound up in a
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, David G. Andersen wrote:
Are there compelling reasons not to change the socket buffer
timeout to a u_long from a u_short? This variable stores
the number of ticks before the socket operation times out.
-Dave (not on
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
David G. Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there compelling reasons not to change the socket buffer
timeout to a u_long from a u_short? This variable stores
the number of ticks before the socket operation times out.
I already changed it from short to int in
Julian Elischer wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, David G. Andersen wrote:
Are there compelling reasons not to change the socket buffer
timeout to a u_long from a u_short? This variable stores
the number of ticks before the socket operation times out.
At present, the maximum SO_RCVTIMEO or
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
FWIW: upping the roll-over rate is not a good reason to increase
the size of fields, unless you want to increase the TCP sequence
number filed to 64 bits? ...it has exactly the same issues at
high data rates.
That's what the timestamp option does and
Nate Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
FWIW: upping the roll-over rate is not a good reason to increase
the size of fields, unless you want to increase the TCP sequence
number filed to 64 bits? ...it has exactly the same issues at
high data rates.
That's what the
Hi,
I recently installed linux winex (again) now that I have working
nVidia drivers. However I found that almost nothing worked and there was a
message about mmap2 not being implemented. I implemented it, but I'm not
sure if it's done right... because some things started working after I
UNIVERSIDAD EN LINEA - ASESORES VIRTUALES
Facultad Virtual de Computación e Informática
INVITACIÓN
Señor (a), Usuario de internet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] tengo el agrado de
invitarle a usted y circulo amistoso laboral, en participar de nuestro 5to diplomado
de gestión en comercio
Hi
Have You any sample ?
and i want to know how the packet is writen on pcap buffer and how they will
forward ? if they are forwarded after the saving or they will never be
forwarded ?
i mean that is this scenario true ? or not
packet ip_input -copy of packet--- writen to pcap
21 matches
Mail list logo
