Hi,
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002 19:56:46 -0600 (CST)
D J Hawkey Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
hawkeyd In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
hawkeyd[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 07:18:54AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
I can't imagine what Moz is doing within it's DNS code, even
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 07:56:46PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 07:18:54AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
I can't imagine what Moz is doing within it's DNS code, even with the
serialized DNS lookups. If
peterjeremy One of my systems insists on trying to deliver mail directly
peterjeremy to A record addresses rather than via MX records. I've tried
peterjeremy comparing the configuration with a system that works sanely
peterjeremy and can't find any explanation for this behaviour. Does this
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Well, the idea of doing a status here at the last day of the year
is not that bad, despite the off-center way it was introduced by
our cute trolloid.
5.0-R is edging its way towards reality, and I think that is a
fitting tribute to the project as we enter the year which
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:57:11PM +1100, I wrote:
One of my systems insists on trying to deliver mail directly to A
record addresses rather than via MX records.
Thanks to everyone who responded. Turns out it was an operator error :-(.
I tried setting various trace flags and eventually found my
I'm trying to get a connecting process' PID that's using a UNIX socket.
recvmsg makes it appear possible, but so far no good.
Has anyone done this before? Can you supply a code sippet???
jim...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the
Under certain circumstances, when sending mail, the mail will
appear in the local spool directory as
Deferred: Operation timed out with otherhost.domain
while observably there has no timeout happened: the sendmail
has returned just immediately from the failing delivery
action.
It is
pmc While it is true that the said sendmail-option solves the problem
pmc (if sendmail is new enough to understand it), I could nowhere find
pmc information on how to fix the bug in the nameserver - that is,
pmc in the nameserver that is packaged with FreeBSD 4.4 or 4.7.
FreeBSD's nameserver is
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
pmc While it is true that the said sendmail-option solves the problem
pmc (if sendmail is new enough to understand it), I could nowhere find
pmc information on how to fix the bug in the nameserver - that is,
pmc in the nameserver that is packaged with FreeBSD 4.4 or
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003, Peter Much wrote:
Attached is a log of what is happening actually, there
are two systems disp and gate involved. gate is the
mailhub, and disp wants to send a mail to it:
Hostname: disp (127.0.0.1)gate (127.0.0.1)
OS: FreeBSD 4.4
10 matches
Mail list logo
