It seems Travis L. Leuthauser wrote:
Is anyone currently working on support for the Promise PDC20275 FastTrack TX
EIDE Controller, which comes on the AOpen AX4B Pro-533 for ATA133? If so,
is there an ETA for support?
Should be supported already...
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
It seems Travis L. Leuthauser wrote:
none3@pci2:14:0:class=0x018085 card=0x1275105a chip=0x1275105a
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Promise Technology Inc'
device = 'PDC20275 FastTrack TX EIDE Controller'
class= mass storage
Running 4.7 Stable as of today around 2PM
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 06:18:38PM -0600, Jay Sern Liew wrote:
Greetings.
Does anyone know if a NFS server with a 7200RPM IDE HD will perform
significantly better than a 5400RPM IDE HD over a cable connection? I'm
assuming that the performance will only be noticable iff the NFS
Çäðàâñòâóéòå!
Íîâûé âèä çàðàáîòêà â ñåòè:
http://www.sveta-net1.narod.ru
Ïðîøó ïðîùåíèÿ, åñëè îòíÿëà ó âàñ âðåìÿ...
Ñâåòëàíà
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Thank you very much.. I was beginning to wonder if I had grossly over looked
something when I built world :)
-Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soeren Schmidt
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 3:50 AM
To: Travis L. Leuthauser
Cc:
On 1/18/2003 2:50 AM, Scott Mitchell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 06:18:38PM -0600, Jay Sern Liew wrote:
Does anyone know if a NFS server with a 7200RPM IDE HD will perform
significantly better than a 5400RPM IDE HD over a cable connection? I'm
assuming that the performance will only be
If by 'cable' you mean a cable modem providing at best a few Mb/s
bandwidth, then I doubt the speed of your disk will have any impact
whatsoever. Even the crappiest ATA disk will be able to deliver a few
MB/s -- in the worst case that's still an order of magnitude more than you
can stuff
Terry Lambert wrote:
Yury Tarasievich wrote:
[...info and pointers greatly appreciated...]
Now:
Most of the reasons this stuff is not in FreeBSD is NIH (not
being the pet research project of a committer), license, the
need to productize the code from research, etc..
For the complaints
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out why recent -current snapshots hang at boot/install
time on my Thinkpad. The problem is, at the point where it hangs, I
don't know exactly which driver it's in (yes, I have boot_verbose turned
on).
So my question is, is there a simple tool to list the order in
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
DP There is sorting that you can do, like putting the highest-traffic rules
DP near the top. ipfw terminates the search on the first matching rule except
DP for count and skipto. Also, the fewer items that have to be checked the
DP faster the rule is.
Quoting Scott Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If by 'cable' you mean a cable modem providing at best a few Mb/s
bandwidth, then I doubt the speed of your disk will have any impact
whatsoever. Even the crappiest ATA disk will be able to deliver a few
MB/s -- in the worst case that's still an
Lars Eggert wrote:
If by 'cable' you mean a cable modem providing at best a few Mb/s
bandwidth, then I doubt the speed of your disk will have any impact
whatsoever. Even the crappiest ATA disk will be able to deliver a few
MB/s -- in the worst case that's still an order of magnitude more
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
FWIW;
The UNIX grep executable is like 3 times smaller than
GNU grep but also like 3 times slower.
I think that it's said in GNU grep readme: they have knowingly
chosen a faster but more memory-consuming algorithm. And I think
that they've done similar choices in
Arun Sharma wrote:
So my question is, is there a simple tool to list the order in which
various initialization/probe routines get called in mi_startup ? If not,
what would it take to write one ?
more /sys/sys/kernel.h
The SYSINIT elements are bubble sorted by a primary key, the
subsystem
On 1/18/2003 2:27 PM, Terry Lambert wrote:
Lars Eggert wrote:
I've tried NFS mounting ISI servers at home over PPTP over a cable modem
connection, and it's painfully slow - much slower than the bandwidth of
the cable pipe. NFS isn't well tuned for high-RTT environments (in my
case, 20ms).
The
Terry Lambert wrote:
Arun Sharma wrote:
So my question is, is there a simple tool to list the order in which
various initialization/probe routines get called in mi_startup ? If not,
what would it take to write one ?
more /sys/sys/kernel.h
Yes, I'm aware of this one, but it doesn't tell me
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: I was testing a new machine and it did a make buildworld in about
: 18:47.
:
: I was impressed..
:
: 2.8GHz P4, 2G ram. src, obj on 2 x SCSI drives on separate controllers.
: (there are more but they were
17 matches
Mail list logo
