Sergey Babkin wrote:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Not really possible, without CVSup coming onto a vendor branch instead
>
> Actually, I was thinking of the opposite: doing all the changes
> on a vendor branch (or in some separate local repository altogether),
> then merging them into the main branc
Hi Folks,
This is an open ended email with a question about how
to increase performance of a 4-stable system running in a
high-load environment. The src is current as of:
FreeBSD 4.8-RC #1: Sun Mar 16 15:44:01
Running top on the system:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME
Hello,
I'd like to learn more about how FreeBSD handles running out of
KVM. We're running a 4GB of RAM system with no swap being
used, but we're run out of KVM and I'd like to go read through the
code to see how this is handled so I can be on the lookout for
potential issues that may come up.
> > > It gets handled in the same way as now: I believe, CVS checks
> > > whether the checked-out version matches the top of the branch,
> > > and if it does not then it refuses to commit and requires you
> > > to make an update. So the same thing can be done for a "local branch":
> > > check that
Nate Williams wrote:
>
> > It gets handled in the same way as now: I believe, CVS checks
> > whether the checked-out version matches the top of the branch,
> > and if it does not then it refuses to commit and requires you
> > to make an update. So the same thing can be done for a "local branch":
>
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> Sergey Babkin wrote:
> > Nate Williams wrote:
>
> [ ... "CVS cache and cache coherency" ... ]
>
> > Yet another idea is to be able to make "local commits" with committing
> > them to the central remote repository later. Now I have to use RCS
> > locally for the temporary
Dag-Erling SmЬrgrav wrote:
>
> Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > A similar thing may be achieved by checking the files out from the local
> > repository and doing any modification command with option -d. But that's
> > troublesome and inconvenient.
>
> Read the manual page for the she
> > > That's the plan for the next stage, provided that the first stage
> > > goes well. I'm yet to play with CVSup and see if it can be
> > > integrated there (as with system()) easily without making a lot
> > > of changes to CVS itself. Otherwise I'm aftarid it's going to
> > > be a large amount
Nate Williams wrote:
>
> > That's the plan for the next stage, provided that the first stage
> > goes well. I'm yet to play with CVSup and see if it can be
> > integrated there (as with system()) easily without making a lot
> > of changes to CVS itself. Otherwise I'm aftarid it's going to
> > be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I posted this earlier to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and
didn't seem to get any responces. Perhaps some of you might know the
answer?
I have searched for this on google (web/groups) and in the FreeBSD
Mailing list archives. There seems to be
Hi,
Joerg Micheel wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:39:22PM +0300, sergej wrote:
mozno li ustanovit% odnovremenno na odin disk:
unix i windows, i kak jto sdelat%!
I think it would be better if you will ask questions in English.
Get yourself a copy of the "Complete FreeBSD" by Greg Lehey,
which
"ËÒ¡¤Ø³ÅéÁàËÅÇ·Õè¨ÐÇҧἹ ÂèÍÁá»ÅÇèҤسÇҧἹ·Õè¨ÐÅéÁàËÅÇ"
¨ÔÁ âÃËì¹ ¹Ñ¡»ÃѪÒÍѹ´Ñº 1 ¢Í§âÅ¡
àªè¹ ¤Ø³¤Ô´ÇèÒ㹪ÕÇÔµ¹ÕéàÃÒ¤§äÁèÁÕ·Ò§ÃÇ ¤Ø³¡çä¨ÐäÁèÁÕ·Ò§ÃÇÂàÅÂ
ËÃ×Í "¤Ø³¤Ô´ÇèÒÊÑ¡Çѹ¶Ö§©Ñ¹µéͧÃÇÂá¹èæ"
¨ÔÁ âÃËì¹ ºÍ¡ÇèÒ
"¶éҤسÂѧ·ÓÊÔ觷Õè¤Ø³·ÓÍÂÙè·Ø¡Çѹ¹Õé ÍÕ¡ 3 »Õ¢éҧ˹éÒÅͧ¤Ô´´Ù
"ËÒ¡¤Ø³ÅéÁàËÅÇ·Õè¨ÐÇҧἹ ÂèÍÁá»ÅÇèҤسÇҧἹ·Õè¨ÐÅéÁàËÅÇ"
¨ÔÁ âÃËì¹ ¹Ñ¡»ÃѪÒÍѹ´Ñº 1 ¢Í§âÅ¡
àªè¹ ¤Ø³¤Ô´ÇèÒ㹪ÕÇÔµ¹ÕéàÃÒ¤§äÁèÁÕ·Ò§ÃÇ ¤Ø³¡çä¨ÐäÁèÁÕ·Ò§ÃÇÂàÅÂ
ËÃ×Í "¤Ø³¤Ô´ÇèÒÊÑ¡Çѹ¶Ö§©Ñ¹µéͧÃÇÂá¹èæ"
¨ÔÁ âÃËì¹ ºÍ¡ÇèÒ
"¶éҤسÂѧ·ÓÊÔ觷Õè¤Ø³·ÓÍÂÙè·Ø¡Çѹ¹Õé ÍÕ¡ 3 »Õ¢éҧ˹éÒÅͧ¤Ô´´Ù
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 07:58:13PM +, Scott Mitchell wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 07:08:40PM +0100, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> > Le Saturday 15 March 2003 18:14, Avleen Vig a ?crit :
> > > I don't expect HUGE problems with making world, but am I asking for
> > > trouble if I make a new kerne
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:06:27AM +0300, "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> >It is time to invent "ping socket" and "traceroute socket"
> >in addition to tcp, udp, divert so on?
>
> Whilst this might seem nice, actually implementing so that it is
> both useful and safe is not easy.
>
> For a "ping socket"
15 matches
Mail list logo
