I have 4.8 vintage PC with an Epox 8K9A9I motherboard
(http://www.epox.com/html/motherboard.asp?product=EP-8K9AIlang=1) which has
an onboard vr(4) interface.
I find that if the interface auto negotiates, it picks 100Mbit/FDX which
matches the switch, but transfers are very bursty. If I force
Have you tried hardcoding both the card and the switch that sometimes helps.
Steve
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joshua Oreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
I'm writing a little application that needs to watch a file that another
process is writing to, think 'tail -F'.
I would say, use select(2).
Is there a reason this wouldn't work?
Select doesn't work with files.
Tony Finch wrote:
Joshua Oreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
I'm writing a little application that needs to watch a file that another
process is writing to, think 'tail -F'.
I would say, use select(2).
Is there a reason this wouldn't work?
On Monday 16 June 2003 19:46, Steven Hartland wrote:
Have you tried hardcoding both the card and the switch that sometimes
helps.
I can't change the switch, it is relatively stupid.
Also, I'd rather not have to do that - I can just put a Alloy 1430TX card in
and know it's going to work :)
I
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I have 4.8 vintage PC with an Epox 8K9A9I motherboard
(http://www.epox.com/html/motherboard.asp?product=EP-8K9AIlang=1) which has
an onboard vr(4) interface.
I find that if the interface auto negotiates, it picks 100Mbit/FDX which
matches the
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:44:15AM +0100 or thereabouts, Tony Finch seemed to write:
Joshua Oreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
I'm writing a little application that needs to watch a file that another
process is writing to, think 'tail -F'.
I
We have been working on improving Web server performance on
FreeBSD, and think you may be interested in the results and
techniques we used. Specifically, we focus on the SpecWeb99
benchmark and the Flash Web Server, and have roughly quadrupled
its performance. We did this by adding support for a
Hi,
recently, I found vidcontrol and played a bit with it. I have been
looking for documents about how to output pixels (graphics) on the
terminal. I could not find any. Before I give up, I want to ask here,
if it is possible to do that. What I want to do is to port my
applications from
Select doesn't work with files.
Really? `man 2 select' says nothing about that. It just talks about
'file descriptors'. Now if it said 'socket descriptors' or 'non-file
file descriptors' I would understand, but I don't think that that statement
is implied by the man page. Is there something I'm
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:11:10 -0700
Joshua Oreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:44:15AM +0100 or thereabouts, Tony Finch seemed to write:
Select doesn't work with files.
Really? `man 2 select' says nothing about that. It just talks about
'file descriptors'. Now if
Nakal wrote this message on Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 20:15 +0200:
recently, I found vidcontrol and played a bit with it. I have been
looking for documents about how to output pixels (graphics) on the
terminal. I could not find any. Before I give up, I want to ask here,
if it is possible to do
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:15:06 +0200
Nakal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
recently, I found vidcontrol and played a bit with it. I have been
looking for documents about how to output pixels (graphics) on the
terminal.
See /usr/share/examples/libvgl
I could not find any. Before I give up, I
In a message written on Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:10:24PM -0400, Eric Jacobs wrote:
I don't think the advantage of a GUI-based installer would be
eye-candy. libdialog looks fine IMO. It would be to increase the
ease of use, allow more flexibility in installations, and add more
On Monday 16 June 2003 21:10, Eric Jacobs wrote:
See /usr/share/examples/libvgl
Yupp. That looks good. Thank you!
I've been thinking about that too. The big question I have is whether
it's a good idea to use a toolkit with a more restrictive license
(GPL, LGPL, MPL), which would make it a
* Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Date: 2003-06-16 ]
[ w.r.t. Re: floppy.. Was: Drawing graphics on terminal ]
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:43:59PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Leo Bicknell, and lo! it spake thus:
Another idea is to make a floppy just smart enough to load the
On 16 Jun, Juli Mallett wrote:
Not to turn this into too much of a bikeshed, but here's an idea I
jotted down a while ago:
%%%
There has been a lot of talk about deprecation of floppies in upcoming
releases, and I've been thinking a lot about whether or not we need to
do this, and I've
Hi,
Thanks for your interests. Just clarify that it is not a patch to boost kernel
performance, but for the performance debugging tool we built, DeBox.
We should be able to release the patch in a few days.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be very interested in a copy of the patches, I have several
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:38:06 -0500
Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Network install.
The floppy could include only network (and requisite) drivers,
such that mass storage drivers could be pulled over the net at
an early stage in the install. Ideally we would work
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Some of this could be done in the current installer, if there wasn't
an effort to make it still fit on a floppy. Mind you, I'd like to see
the floppy based install stick around for a while, but I think FreeBSD
needs to embrace the CD reality.
We
--eRtJSFbw+EEWtPj3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:10:24PM -0400, Eric Jacobs wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:15:06 +0200
Nakal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=20
Hi,
=20
recently, I
if you wanna try something nice mmap() /dev/mem and write to VGA memory =D
From: Nakal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Drawing graphics on terminal
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:15:06 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([216.136.204.119]) by
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 01:20:03PM -0400, Yaoping Ruan wrote:
We have been working on improving Web server performance on
FreeBSD, and think you may be interested in the results and
techniques we used. Specifically, we focus on the SpecWeb99
benchmark and the Flash Web Server, and have
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 00:40, Mike Silbersack wrote:
Well, there have been a few reports of similar problems. However, back
when those reports came in, there were a bunch of other problems with our
if_vr driver, so everyone gave up and switched network cards before we
could get to the duplex
I am trying to work around a problem, where a routing daemon (zebra)
installs a subnet, that I then want to convert over to a connected route
off an interface via ifconfig
e.g. on vlan2 I want to add an interface on the subnet 12.0.0.112/28.
Before the ifconfig I see
# route get
Joshua Oreman wrote:
I would say, use select(2).
Is there a reason this wouldn't work?
Select doesn't work with files.
Really? `man 2 select' says nothing about that. It just talks about
'file descriptors'. Now if it said 'socket descriptors' or 'non-file
file descriptors' I would
26 matches
Mail list logo
