On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I'm considering options for a new project, and I think I've discovered
what I think is the best idea, but I don't think current software
supports the config. I'd like to get some confirmation, and comments on
if it would be hard to implement.
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 01:04:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:20:03PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:39:03PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
I installed FreeBSD 4.9RC1 on P4 3GHz with hyperthreading and I see
drastic
Leo Bicknell wrote:
Now, NAT would be required. What I want to do is write an external
application to decide the performance of ISP #1 and ISP#2, and
somehow tell NAT which outside address to use.
Depends on how much money you have, but had you considered getting your
own address range and BGP
Depends on how much money you have, but had you considered getting your
own address range and BGP peering with your ISPs? I'd consider talking
to them about it. It'll take some time to setup, but it means your
switching is done at the router, not at the NAT box, which is the
wrong place
From: Wilko Bulte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 01:04:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:20:03PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:39:03PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
I installed FreeBSD 4.9RC1
Hi,
I have a perl regex to test if a file resides under a particular
directory. The test looks like this:
if ($filename =~ $directory) {
# yes, this filename resides under directory
}
This is working for most cases. However, it fails is the directory
contains a +. For example:
$filename
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm considering options for a new project, and I think I've discovered
what I think is the best idea, but I don't think current software
supports the config. I'd like to get some confirmation, and
comments on
if it would be hard to implement.
I think it might just be easier to do a straight comparison of the first N
characters of the two strings where N = length of the directory name.
Any suggestions?
You might try index() or substr().
Fred
--
MOTHER:
Half a word.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I have a perl regex to test if a file resides under a particular
directory. The test looks like this:
if ($filename =~ $directory) {
# yes, this filename resides under directory
}
This is working for most cases. However, it fails is the
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:32:11AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I have a perl regex to test if a file resides under a particular
directory. The test looks like this:
if ($filename =~ $directory) {
# yes, this filename resides under directory
}
This is working for most cases.
:FWIW, if you set the machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=1, your power will
:go down considerably (our AC inlet power dropped 0.94A @ 110V).
:The performance will also go up considerably.
:
:HTT seems to get a lot of bad press on this list, and its due
:to this sysctl having the wrong default.
Sheesh,
On Saturday 04 October 2003 07:21 am, Dan Langille wrote:
On 4 Oct 2003 at 10:17, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
All our testing on this patch has been successful. I'm going to
do a few more tests on different hardware under 4.8-stable.
What's the
On Sunday 05 October 2003 01:02 am, Nick Rogness wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I'm considering options for a new project, and I think I've
discovered what I think is the best idea, but I don't think current
software supports the config. I'd like to get some confirmation,
In a message written on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 01:43:01PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
Leo, you may be able to do this with ipfilter's ipnat. Nat rules are
traditionally processed with 'ipnat -CF', the -C clears the rules and
the -F option clears the currently active NAT mappings. You should
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Wes Peters wrote:
On Sunday 05 October 2003 01:02 am, Nick Rogness wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I'm considering options for a new project, and I think I've
discovered what I think is the best idea, but I don't think current
software supports the
15 matches
Mail list logo