I'm looking to replace an aging fileserver with an Asus A7V600 board.
Presently it appears FreeBSD does not support the serial ATA interface on
the south bridge. As this appears to be the first Via serial ATA controller,
am I safe in assuming this will not be supported for some time?
I have
It seems Sean Hamilton wrote:
I'm looking to replace an aging fileserver with an Asus A7V600 board.
Presently it appears FreeBSD does not support the serial ATA interface on
the south bridge. As this appears to be the first Via serial ATA controller,
am I safe in assuming this will not be
Hi,
I'm a FreeBSD src committer who deals with Dell hardware a lot. I've just
committed a port of afaapps to FreeBSD. I should be grateful if you could
add this to your extremely useful list of resources.
Please pass on my sincere thanks to your colleagues at Dell for providing us
with these
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:54:00PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
That, by itself, is not hard. Here's the trick. I want the switch
to be seamless. That is, if NAT is translating to ISP #1 and the
application says switch to #2 the existing translations to #1 (until
they go away naturally)
In a message written on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:11:05PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
In addition to keeping your NAT translations (as suggested by
Wes), you need to also keep routes for those entries as well, so
that preserved traffic remains to route out the right ISP even if
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:43:46AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:11:05PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
In addition to keeping your NAT translations (as suggested by
Wes), you need to also keep routes for those entries as well, so
that
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:11:05PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
In addition to keeping your NAT translations (as suggested by
Wes), you need to also keep routes for those entries as well, so
that preserved traffic
On Monday 06 October 2003 06:43, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Note, I think this configuration would be useful in a lot of other
applications as well. Consider someone who can get, say, a 128k
symmetric DSL line, and a 56k up 1M down satellite link. If using
this trick you could direct latency
Is your mailer screwed up? We're getting duplicates (a few
days later).
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
On 18 Sep 2003 at 7:50, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
On 16 Sep 2003 at 20:49, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Dan
On 6 Oct 2003 at 19:10, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Is your mailer screwed up? We're getting duplicates (a few
days later).
I don't think so. Could they have been moderated? What do the headers say?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL
On Monday, 6 October 2003 at 21:46:24 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 6 Oct 2003 at 19:10, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Is your mailer screwed up? We're getting duplicates (a few
days later).
I don't think so. Could they have been moderated? What do the
headers say?
Somebody in France has set up
11 matches
Mail list logo
