Rod Person wrote:
On Thursday 06 November 2003 09:09 am, It was written:
If you futs with getting Kylix to run under FreeBSD, don't forget the
special glibc requirements that some versions of Kylix have. Maybe you
should probably simply replace the entire /compat userland with the
hi all,
is there any interest/progress with SCSI over IP?
I am asking because our NetApp is supposed to support it, and the other
approach, FiberChannel/EMC seems 'slightly' expensive.
thanks,
danny
PS: all our servers are running Freebsd 4.[8-9] with great success
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Danny Braniss wrote:
DBhi all,
DB is there any interest/progress with SCSI over IP?
DBI am asking because our NetApp is supposed to support it, and the other
DBapproach, FiberChannel/EMC seems 'slightly' expensive.
DB
DBthanks,
DB danny
DBPS: all our servers are
Hmm, and to the list :)
Rod Person + Terry Lamber wrote:
On Thursday 06 November 2003 09:09 am, It was written:
If you futs with getting Kylix to run under FreeBSD, don't forget the
special glibc requirements that some versions of Kylix have. Maybe you
should probably simply
Hi, I looked in the new APIC code you commit.
The thing that prevent ACPI subsystem from moduler
is the way we aquire ACPI root pointer, I think. Right?
If so, we can took this in way.
1. Move
u_long i386_acpi_root;
to machdep.c and madt.c use i386_acpi_root variable, instead of calling
Hi all,
I'm developing a simple sniffer for a unix network programming course
at my university and I've found a problem with the default installation
of libpcap in FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE.
Here's the problem: I'm trying to use pcap_compile() and
pcap_setfilter() to set a filter on a given device, but
On 07-Nov-2003 Takanori Watanabe wrote:
Hi, I looked in the new APIC code you commit.
The thing that prevent ACPI subsystem from moduler
is the way we aquire ACPI root pointer, I think. Right?
Nope. It's more complex than that. We should only use the MADT to enumerate
CPUs if we are using
Hello,
I am trying to do asynchronous send/receive between a user process that I am
writing and a kernel module that I am also writing.
I thought about implementing something similar to unix routing socket, but I
will have to define a new domain and protosw.
Beside that idea, what else would you
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Jerry Toung wrote:
I am trying to do asynchronous send/receive between a user process that
I am writing and a kernel module that I am also writing. I thought
about implementing something similar to unix routing socket, but I will
have to define a new domain and protosw.
Thank you very much for the inputs.
On Friday 07 November 2003 01:53 pm, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Jerry Toung wrote:
I am trying to do asynchronous send/receive between a user process that
I am writing and a kernel module that I am also writing. I thought
about
A KLD module ncs_time_ctl.ko compiled on both 4.8 and 4.9 hosts can be loaded
by kldload on any 4.8 machine. But neither .ko files can be loaded on a 4.9
machine.
The error is:
4.9 # kldload -v ./ncs_time_ctl.ko
kldload: can't load ./ncs_time_ctl.ko: Exec format error
kldload should give more
Another idea is to do something with msgsnd()/msgrcv() to allow the kernel
to do interprocess communication with userland processes. Some of the
older operating systems (DEC's TOPS-10, for example) used this technique.
Later
Mark Hittinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Branko F. Grac(nar wrote:
I tried today with yesterday's -CURRENT. Same symptoms. No kernel panic,
just lockup.
Ok, submit a PR with clear details on how to recreate the problem, and
we'll see if someone can take a look into it. I'm
Hi All,
I get panics at random times of the day with -CURRENT from 20031105, with
absolutely no load on the machine.
The machine acts as a dial-up server/gateway/firewall for my local lan. I
managed to get a coredump.
The contents of the rt pointer passed to RTFREE() does really not look right
On Friday 07 November 2003 07:49 am, Jaco H. van Tonder wrote:
Hi All,
I get panics at random times of the day with -CURRENT from 20031105, with
absolutely no load on the machine.
The machine acts as a dial-up server/gateway/firewall for my local lan. I
managed to get a coredump.
The
15 matches
Mail list logo
