On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:01:23AM -0800, FB wrote:
+ We patched mijail5 (http://garage.freebsd.pl/mijail.README) against
+ RELENG_5_1. Most of the patch was successful with a little fuzz, except for
+ a couple lines in jls which didn't patch due to cosmetic changes (easily
+ fixed).
+
+
Outside the jail, it worked fine. inside the jail, sendto failed with a
EINVAL error.
See:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/26506
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
Bill Studenmund wrote:
I think the difference is in the default behavior. When you're at EOF, I
know that poll() will give you a read-availability event, so you'll read
the EOF. Will kqueue?
AFAIK yes for sockets, not for file descriptor (i.e. descriptor
open to a file on filesystem). Would
I think the difference is in the default behavior. When you're at
EOF, I know that poll() will give you a read-availability event, so
you'll read the EOF. Will kqueue?
AFAIK yes for sockets, not for file descriptor (i.e. descriptor open
to a file on filesystem). Would poll() give you
John Baldwin wrote:
Also, as someone else mentioned, setting 'machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=1' can
be useful on some HTT systems. However, p4's have a problem with their
interrupt routing that can leave the second CPU halted for a long time
if you do that.
I have a few quick questions... Searched on
AFAIK yes for sockets, not for file descriptor (i.e. descriptor
open to a file on filesystem). Would poll() give you read-availability
event when on end of file on filesystem.
IIRC poll() is required to report that files are always readable.
(So tail -f can't use poll() to avoid looping.)
Jos Backus wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 10:31:18AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
If a process starts up and does a setuid, should it be writing the
PID file before or after the setuid?
Two methods exists AFAIK:
1 - write your PID immediately, and the file is chown root:wheel
2 -
Perter Pentechv wrote
Take a look at the kenv(1) utility - its source is in the
src/usr.bin/kenv/kenv.c file.
Yes this does the job. But in a strange way... It starts at OID 0.3
(kern.environment) and appends small integers to it (0,1,2,3 etc). Why do it
so strange.. Why are the variable names
* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031113 11:46]:
Jos Backus wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 10:31:18AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
1 - write your PID immediately, and the file is chown root:wheel
2 - write your PID to /var/run/myapp/myapp.pid where /var/run/myapp/
is chown
my system is running 5.1 and i installed the latest
ymessenger from the ports. when i run it i get this
message:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libintl.so.4
not found
how can i fix this?
Want to chat instantly
Jose Kulalapnot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|my system is running 5.1 and i installed the latest
|ymessenger from the ports. when i run it i get this
|message:
|
|/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libintl.so.4
Reinstall gettext and everything that depends on it from scratch.
|not
A PR might be a good idea. The basic details are that ACPI in 4.x needs
to create a kernel process to service it's private taskqueue and then
use this taskqueue instead of the system taskqueue to service events.
FYI: PR is kern/59248.
Andre
Vlad Galu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|Jose Kulalapnot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
||my system is running 5.1 and i installed the latest
||ymessenger from the ports. when i run it i get this
||message:
||
||/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libintl.so.4
|
| Reinstall gettext and
tnx Vlad. im now running ymessenger. my id is
buttmanizer. add me if u want.
--- Vlad Galu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vlad
Galu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|Jose Kulalapnot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
||my system is running 5.1 and i installed the
latest
||ymessenger from the ports. when i
tnx Vlad. im now running ymessenger. my id is
buttmanizer. add me if u want.
--- Vlad Galu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vlad
Galu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|Jose Kulalapnot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
||my system is running 5.1 and i installed the
latest
||ymessenger from the ports. when i
Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
marius aamodt eriksen wrote:
in order to be able to preserve consistent semantics across poll,
select, and kqueue (EVFILT_READ), i propose the following change: on
EVFILT_READ, add an fflag NOTE_EOF which will return when the file
pointer *is* at the end of the file
Jose Kulalapnot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|tnx Vlad. im now running ymessenger. my id is
|buttmanizer. add me if u want.
|
I would, but your ID sounds scary :)
|
|
| --- Vlad Galu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vlad
|Galu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| |Jose Kulalapnot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Ellard wrote:
Can someone point me at some non-marketing documentation about
hyperthreading on the latest Intel chips? I'm seeing some strange
performance measurements and I would like to figure out what they
mean.
Go out to Intel's web site's developer section, and look for
SMT.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:45:18AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Why use pid files at all if you could be using a process supervisor instead?
Who supervises the supervisor?
Heh. The supervisor should be small and robust, like init. Has init died on
you recently? Do you want to solve this
19 matches
Mail list logo
