On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 01:12:25PM -0600, William Grim wrote:
If it's really such a big deal to get rid of floppy support, how about
we get rid of it and make sure an older version of FreeBSD 4.x/5.x is
always available for download? This way, floppy users could install an
older version of the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg 'groggy' Lehey
As much as I would hate to see RF and Vinum disappar from our
source tree, maybe what we need to do is to kick them both into
training-camp in p4 while you and Greg look the other way.
Hmm. I can't see why they have to disappear from the
Hello people,
I have a bit of a problem to get my Wacom Graphire3 (USB) to work with
FreeBSD. At first I thought I was doing something wrong, but it seems that
FreeBSD doesnt understand it. I know it works with OpenBSD and NetBSD, and
that it probably is due to uhid.c
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark Linimon writes:
But, in the real world of software engineering, He Who Breaketh It,
Must Fixeth It.
If we are talking paid jobs, yes, then you can make rules like that
because with the salary you control resource allocation and
prioritization.
My real life
i re-applied the patches to the latest bootp.c, and took care not to
botch up the tabs, but my user friendly emacs was not too helpful :-)
(the diff is now about 500 lines)
the PR is:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=61239
thanks,
danny
Sounds very interesting indeed.
Hello hackers!
Help to understand problem.
I have FreeBSD 4.9 on my box.
# uname -a
FreeBSD wall.ru 4.9-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p1 #24
I've tried to Upgrade it to 5.1
# cvsup /etc/cvsupfile
# cd /usr/src
# make buildworld
===
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 12:39:22PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
+ I started RAIDframe three years ago with the hope of bringing a proven
+ and extensible RAID stack to FreeBSD. Unfortunately, while it was made
+ to work pretty well on 4.x, it has never been viable on 5.x; it never
+ survived the
Poul-Henning, do you have a list of GEOM programming info available so
that one have something to start with for example to make Vinum
compatible with GEOM.
I read the GEOM manpage in 5.2, have looked at your webpage
(http://people.freebsd.org/~phk) and have found a paper and some slides.
Are
Well, I'll look into that in GDB somewhen, when I have time if nobody
else has any idea...
I tried four functions from three different areas of the kernel, and
all crashed, so I didn't bother to try more... But I'll try more
somewhen and see if I find functions which don't cause a panic...
I forgot to mention on rather important factor in this equation:
Er, this is the *only* important factor. IMHO, it made most of the
previous conversation be completely off-the-rails.
If nothing happens, vinum is going to break even more very soon.
No ... if you do a commit that changes the
If vinum means a lot to you, you should do something to get it above
that threshold: start debugging/coding, learn to code if need be,
donate money so somebody else can code if you can't do anything
else.
I don't use vinum so I have no stake in this.
OTOH I'm not announcing changes which
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin Nilsson writes:
I read the GEOM manpage in 5.2, have looked at your webpage
(http://people.freebsd.org/~phk) and have found a paper and some slides.
I'm afraid that you have pretty much discovered what there is at this
point in time. Kirk is updating the
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:30:15PM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote:
So I noticed. But it seems to me as if the undefers could be removed
from within the if-else-blocks and collapsed into a single undefer just
beneath the if-else-blocks, right before the
_thread_leave_cancellation_point();
Hmm, this
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 05:48:19PM +, Colin Percival wrote:
While browsing the FreeBSD src tree, I came across a number of
binary files (listed below); the regression tests are perhaps
understandable, but shouldn't the rest of these files be uuencoded?
contrib/groff/doc/gnu.png
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:00:34AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark Linimon writes:
But, in the real world of software engineering, He Who Breaketh It,
Must Fixeth It.
If we are talking paid jobs, yes, then you can make rules like that
because with the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Hay writes:
But, in the real world of software engineering, He Who Breaketh It,
Must Fixeth It.
...
In a free software project, you can take any rule like that an put
it anywhere you like, in any font, size and color of your choice
and it still wont work.
Hi,
Some time ago I released the first public version of my atuwi driver (for
Atmel usb wireless adapters). Since then I have made a lot of changes to the
code and today it's time to release the next version...
Version 0.2 features :
* A nice step-by-step guide to installing and using the
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Mark Linimon wrote:
If nothing happens, vinum is going to break even more very soon.
No ... if you do a commit that changes the code assumptions upon which
vinum was built, vinum will break. vinum is not going to magically
break by itself.
This gets back to a
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:24:38PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-11 11:02 -0800]:
If you could make this work such that you just stuffed GENERIC and the
mfsroot onto however many floppies it takes, I think that would almost
certaintly solve re's
On Monday 12 January 2004 07:22 am, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:24:38PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
I don't know the release build process, so I don't know how much
effort is neccessary to create such floppies, but the loader seems to
have all features needed to use
On Sunday 11 January 2004 12:36 pm, Scott W wrote:
David Gilbert wrote:
Poul-Henning == Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Poul-Henning In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Poul-Henning Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes:
Poul-Henning The reason I say this is that neither of you have the
On Monday 12 January 2004 05:53 am, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 05:48:19PM +, Colin Percival wrote:
While browsing the FreeBSD src tree, I came across a number of
binary files (listed below); the regression tests are perhaps
understandable, but shouldn't the rest
Hi all,
I've noticed a very weird phenomenon with ping which I can't explain.
I have two machines with 2 NICs.
When I started a ping -f with larger packet size (-s 3052) with NIC 1
and simultaneously hammered NIC 2 with UDP using ttcp, I got duplicate
ping replies (on NIC 1, of course). Not
On Thursday 08 January 2004 13:05, Munish Chopra wrote:
On 2004-01-08 17:29 +, Doug Rabson wrote:
[...]
The three main showstoppers for moving FreeBSD to subversion would be:
1. A replacement for cvsup. Probably quite doable using svnadmin
dump and load.
2. Support for
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:26:22AM -0800, Wes Peters wrote:
On Monday 12 January 2004 07:22 am, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:24:38PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
I don't know the release build process, so I don't know how much
effort is neccessary to create such
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 11:32, Wes Peters wrote:
A few years ago Perforce was working on a write-through cache so you could
have a local duplicate of the server environment, but I haven't seen that
work come out of the company. That would've rocked for our development
model.
They released
On Monday 12 January 2004 01:21 pm, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:26:22AM -0800, Wes Peters wrote:
On Monday 12 January 2004 07:22 am, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:24:38PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
I don't know the release build process, so I
: Agreed. Like I've said, the main problem I see is complexity. It
: wouldn't matter as much if there were 5-10 people with deep knowledge of
: SMPng, but with 1 or 2 hackers working on it, the chance that everything
: will be ever fixed is quite small.
:
:IMO, the easiest way to start the
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 01:12:25PM -0600, William Grim wrote:
: If it's really such a big deal to get rid of floppy support, how about
: we get rid of it and make sure an older version of FreeBSD 4.x/5.x is
:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: If nothing happens, vinum is going to break even more very soon.
:
: No ... if you do a commit that changes the code assumptions upon
: which vinum was built, vinum will break. vinum is not going to
: magically
On Sunday 11 January 2004 04:39 pm, Martin Nilsson wrote:
Marcin Dalecki wrote:
Martin Nilsson wrote:
I'm trying to find out why I can't boot 5.2 from USB CDROM on
Supermicro motherboards. (I have an old Gateway P3 that can!).
I've found out that that only 0x20 of 0x4c sectors of
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Matthew Dillon wrote:
: Agreed. Like I've said, the main problem I see is complexity. It
: wouldn't matter as much if there were 5-10 people with deep knowledge of
: SMPng, but with 1 or 2 hackers working on it, the chance that everything
: will be ever fixed is
On Monday 12 January 2004 07:33, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dag-Erling
=?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=
writes:
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe this would be a good test-case for seeing how well it works?
Maybe not. We do need to run a few more
Well, I know that it's legal to omit one's own copyright claim, but
for some organization to lay claim to copyrights owned by you or me
seems very wrong. It's a violation of BSD-type licenses and a
violation of the concept of attribution that is behind the licenses.
A legal entity has made
34 matches
Mail list logo
