hi,
is there a way of knowing with which kernel-options a particular kernel
was compiled with (appart form the obvious config file)?
danny
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
JE Well, my main headache (SONY Clie SJ20) is now in a bit different state; before
JE (at 4.9p1) it failed to attach with
JE
JE ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2
JE ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2
JE
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, 11:36+0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
hi,
is there a way of knowing with which kernel-options a particular kernel
was compiled with (appart form the obvious config file)?
Yes, if you use 'options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE'. See /sys/conf/NOTES
for details.
--
Maxim
I want to create a small kernel module which logs the socket operations.
So in my module i have a socket structure, and i want to know
which process (thread) owns it. But the socket structure isn't
contains any reference to the process structure. If i walk through
the vnode table i can
The FreeSBIE project is proud to announce the release of
FreeSBIE-1.0-i386.iso
FreeSBIE is a bootable CD with the FreeBSD operating system and a
collection of software to address the needs of an etherogeneus public.
FreeSBIE-1.0 is based on FreeBSD 5.2.1 for the ia32 platform, and has a
hardware
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:36:56AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
hi,
is there a way of knowing with which kernel-options a particular kernel
was compiled with (appart form the obvious config file)?
In general, no.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:36:56AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
hi,
is there a way of knowing with which kernel-options a particular kernel
was compiled with (appart form the obvious config file)?
In general, no.
I have read about an option
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 05:54:18PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
I plan to commit the MFC at http://www.josef-k.net/freebsd/
(the latest one) in the next couple of days. If you really care about
USB in 4.10 you might do well to test this on your equipment,
ESPECIALLY if you have unusual
From: Mike Silbersack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Don Bowman wrote:
You could use ipfw to limit the damage of a syn flood, e.g.
a keep-state rule with a limit of ~2-5 per source IP, lower the
timeouts, increase the hash buckets in ipfw, etc. This would
use a mask on
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Don Bowman wrote:
this would only allow 2 concurrent TCP sessions per unique
source address. Depends on the syn flood you are expecting
to experience. You could also use dummynet to shape syn
traffic to a fixed level i
As a part of tracking down a performance issue, I tried building a
custom kernel (with just IPFW, DUMMYNET added, NMBCLUSTERS, commenting
out MATH_EMULATE, INET6, I386, I486). The system is currently running a
kernel from a similar machine with the same settings. The machine does
run on this
From: Deepak Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a part of tracking down a performance issue, I tried building a
custom kernel (with just IPFW, DUMMYNET added, NMBCLUSTERS,
commenting
out MATH_EMULATE, INET6, I386, I486). The system is currently
running a
kernel from a similar machine
Just a guess, but i think you've bumped nmbclusters or nmbufs up
too much (or perhaps maxsockets, maxfds, ...) and have run out of
KVA.
You can tune clusters mbufs in loader.conf without recompiling
kernel. You will want to see what vm.zone_kmem_pages, vm.zone_kmem_kvaspace
are showing you,
From: Deepak Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a guess, but i think you've bumped nmbclusters or nmbufs up
too much (or perhaps maxsockets, maxfds, ...) and have run out of
KVA.
You can tune clusters mbufs in loader.conf without recompiling
kernel. You will want to see what
Hi,
Anyone managed to get this working?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x028000 card=0x25518086 chip=0x10438086 rev=0x04
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'PRO/Wireless LAN 2100 3B Mini PCI Adapter'
class= network
--
Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977
On Saturday, February 28, 2004, at 09:52 AM, grinder wrote:
I want to create a small kernel module which logs the socket
operations.
So in my module i have a socket structure, and i want to know
which process (thread) owns it. But the socket structure isn't
contains any reference to the process
only in 5.2+ see project evil
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
Anyone managed to get this working?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x028000 card=0x25518086 chip=0x10438086 rev=0x04
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'PRO/Wireless LAN 2100 3B Mini
Somewhere out there there is a ?Virus?/?Hacker?/?Spammer?
getting really annoying..
take this one for example:.. It has a legit FreeBSD from
address of someone I'd read, and a subject line that I've seen before on
this list, and all sorts of other forgery stuff.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb
The USB code in RELENG_4 has been updated to match that in -current.
Please test any USB devices that are critical to you BEFORE we release
4.10 :-)
thanks
Julian
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
The USB code in RELENG_4 has been updated to match that in -current.
Please test any USB devices that are critical to you BEFORE we release
4.10 :-)
p.s. there are some more MFCs to come but they are minor
(except for what looks like a major
On Monday 01 March 2004 10:08, Julian Elischer wrote:
only in 5.2+ see project evil
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
Anyone managed to get this working?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x028000 card=0x25518086 chip=0x10438086 rev=0x04
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:17:44 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.hackers
If you want to spend more time in kernel, perhaps change
I might have HZ @ 2500 as well.
Hi,
Just curious as to the reasoning behind that ?
@ high packet rates, you
At 08:44 PM 29/02/2004, Don Bowman wrote:
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:17:44 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.hackers
If you want to spend more time in kernel, perhaps change
I might have HZ @ 2500 as well.
Hi,
Just curious as to the reasoning
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:44 PM 29/02/2004, Don Bowman wrote:
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:17:44 -0500, in
sentex.lists.freebsd.hackers
If you want to spend more time in kernel, perhaps change
I might have HZ @ 2500
Oh it was just a rant.. :-(
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 04:50:34PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Somewhere out there there is a ?Virus?/?Hacker?/?Spammer?
getting really annoying..
Yeah, but what do you expect anyone to do about it?
Kris
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
Somewhere out there there is a ?Virus?/?Hacker?/?Spammer?
getting really annoying..
Yeah, I'm getting it too. Worst part is, clamav 0.65 doesn't pick it
up. I'm waiting for the 0.67 port to be committed...
Mike Silby Silbersack
26 matches
Mail list logo
