Dear FreeBSD hackers,
could somebody please help Jonathan, the dspam owner, how to code
this best under FreeBSD ?
Please see his question below:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 01:16:17PM -0400, Jonathan A. Zdziarski wrote:
I'm a little concerned about these warnings:
pgsql_drv.c:873: warning:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 07:43:22PM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote:
Dear FreeBSD hackers,
could somebody please help Jonathan, the dspam owner, how to code
this best under FreeBSD ?
s-p_getpwnam = (struct passwd) { NULL, NULL, 0, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL };
!
s-p_getpwuid
Dear FreeBSD hackers,
could somebody please help Jonathan, the dspam owner, how to code
this best under FreeBSD ?
Please see his question below:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 01:16:17PM -0400, Jonathan A. Zdziarski wrote:
I'm a little concerned about these warnings:
pgsql_drv.c:873:
In the last episode (Oct 07), Andreas Klemm said:
Dear FreeBSD hackers,
could somebody please help Jonathan, the dspam owner, how to code
this best under FreeBSD ?
Please see his question below:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 01:16:17PM -0400, Jonathan A. Zdziarski wrote:
I'm a little
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Dan Nelson wrote:
DNIn the last episode (Oct 07), Andreas Klemm said:
DN Dear FreeBSD hackers,
DN
DN could somebody please help Jonathan, the dspam owner, how to code
DN this best under FreeBSD ?
DN
DN Please see his question below:
DN
DN On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 01:16:17PM
On Oct 08, Harti Brandt wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Dan Nelson wrote:
Memset is actually not portable if the structure contains pointers because
it would initialize the pointers to 0 values not to 0 pointers. A 0
pointer not necessarily has a 0 value. A pointer can be portably be
Sick!
Are there actually systems out there that don't have all-zero NULL pointers?
You have officially shattered my previously held beliefs about the
sacredness of memset :(
If there are, I'd be interested to know of them.
Like zero'ing out bss, the definition of NULL as 0 is
left as
Mike Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are there actually systems out there that don't have all-zero NULL
pointers?
Yes. None that FreeBSD runs on, though.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there are, I'd be interested to know of them.
http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q5.17.html
Like zero'ing out bss, the definition of NULL as 0 is
left as implementation specific.
no, zeroing out bss is (indirectly) required by the standard
(ISO-IEC-9899:1999
On Friday 08 October 2004 21:25, Sam wrote:
Are there actually systems out there that don't have all-zero
NULL pointers?
You have officially shattered my previously held beliefs about the
sacredness of memset :(
If there are, I'd be interested to know of them.
Hi,
This question probably has been discussed numerous times, but I'm somewhat
unsure what really causes ATA failures..
I have pretty basic server here which has two IDE drives - each is 200GB.
System is FreeBSD-5.2.1-p9
That server has been setup about 9 months ago, and just about 3 months
The bit fields th_x2 and th_off in struct tcphdr,
even though defined as u_int, actually occupies 1 byte.
What's the trick ?
-- Qing
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Doug Russell wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, John Von Essen wrote:
Well, I eventually got this SCO system working. But today, some errors
appeared:
505k:unrecover error reading SCSI disk on 0 Dev - 1/42
cha = 0 id = 0 1 on = 0
Block 6578
medium error unrecovered read error
HTFS
In the last episode (Oct 08), Li, Qing said:
The bit fields th_x2 and th_off in struct tcphdr,
even though defined as u_int, actually occupies 1 byte.
u_int th_x2:4,/* (unused) */
th_off:4; /* data offset */
The :4 after each variable means 4 bits long,
14 matches
Mail list logo
