Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled

2004-10-12 Thread Jerry
Thank you all for explaining so patiently, I have somewhat of understanding with this issue ~ very appreciated all who commented. Jerry - Yahoo!奇摩電子信箱 100MB 免費信箱,電子信箱新紀元從這開始! http://mail.yahoo.com.tw/

malloc calls and ioctl calls to soundcard cause segfault

2004-10-12 Thread Shawn Webb
I have stumbled upon a local DoS (non-kernel) while writing a VoIP app for FreeBSD. The DoS exists when two ioctl calls (or less/more?) are followed by a malloc call to malloc a pointer in global scope which is then followed by two more (or less/more?) ioctl calls. The result is a stack smash, a

Re: Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?

2004-10-12 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:11:09PM +0200, Andreas Kohn wrote: > if your source files are *exactly* the same versions used as on the > building cluster, and you have *exactly* the same compilation options, > it would still be possible to have different binaries. For example if > the files included s

Re: Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?

2004-10-12 Thread Max Laier
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 13:11, Andreas Kohn wrote: > Jerry wrote: > > --- Andreas Kohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>you might be using different optimization flags than > >>the release > >>building cluster. > >>Also make sure that you have really the correct > >>sources, and n

Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and original binary ?

2004-10-12 Thread Jerry
Hi~ All This is my first time to post question here, and also I am a newbie on FreeBSD. A confusing thing I discover is: Why the binary code I compiled(for example,telnet command)compare with the original one is diffirent, either size or md5 hash , What's going on? Are the source files differ from

Re: Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?

2004-10-12 Thread Andreas Kohn
Jerry wrote: > --- Andreas Kohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>you might be using different optimization flags than >>the release >>building cluster. >>Also make sure that you have really the correct >>sources, and not a newer >>version from CVS. >> >> >Hi~ Andreas, > >I just used

Re: Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?

2004-10-12 Thread Andreas Kohn
Jerry wrote: >Hi~ > >This is my first time to post question here, and also >I am a newbie on FreeBSD. A confusing thing I discover >is: Why the binary code I compiled(for example,telnet >command)compare with the original one is diffirent, >either size or md5 hash value, What's going on? Are >the s

Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?

2004-10-12 Thread Jerry
Hi~ This is my first time to post question here, and also I am a newbie on FreeBSD. A confusing thing I discover is: Why the binary code I compiled(for example,telnet command)compare with the original one is diffirent, either size or md5 hash value, What's going on? Are the source files differ fro