Whener i try to install openoffice 1.1 from ports after several hours
of compiling etc, i get the following error message.
Is openoffice 1.1 port broken? or is it me?
Im running 5.3R and i've cvsuped ports to get gnome 2.8 running which went fine.
Any ideas?
snip build output
Making:
It's our honour and pleasure to announce FreeSBIE 1.1, a LiveCD based
on FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE.
Some of the innovations since 1.0 include:
- A renewed series of scripts to support power users in the use of
FreeSBIE 1.1.
- An installer to let users install FreeSBIE 1.1 on their hard drives,
thus
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:54:32PM +0100, Dario Freni wrote:
- A renewed series of scripts to support power users in the use of
FreeSBIE 1.1.
Could you perhaps give more details? The webpage is a bit sparse.
- An installer to let users install FreeSBIE 1.1 on their hard drives,
thus
Hi,
i need to implement gateway redundancy for our server farm. I found
UCARP ( http://www.ucarp.org ) as a potential solution, but it is written it is
tested successfully only on Linux, OpenBSD and NetBSD.
Did anybody have luck with it under FreeBSD ?
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 14:31, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
Hi,
i need to implement gateway redundancy for our server farm. I found UCARP
( http://www.ucarp.org ) as a potential solution, but it is written it is
tested successfully only on Linux, OpenBSD and NetBSD.
Did anybody have luck
The last time i checked, FreeSBIE GUI
was not to my taste.
-I rather use IceWM as my Window Manager, it is small and fast.
And still very usable. It's my only choise.
-The window manager was in some weird language,
i guess it was brasilian or italian.
Guess i'll have to do my own FreeSBIEs.
Thanks
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:37:09AM +, David Malone wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 07:57:09PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
I have come across a problem where res_send() goes into a minute-long wait
loop, waiting for the hostname to be looked up, after a getaddrinfo() call.
I
It looks like the recursive name server is doing something weird.
The nameservers I use are 193.216.1.10 (primary DNS) (nic.daxnet.no) and
193.216.69.10 (secondary DNS) (ns.tele2.no)
Wired - when I dig at those two machines they respond with the
correct answer. Could there be some sort of
Simon Burke wrote:
Whener i try to install openoffice 1.1 from ports after several hours
of compiling etc, i get the following error message.
Is openoffice 1.1 port broken? or is it me?
Im running 5.3R and i've cvsuped ports to get gnome 2.8 running which went fine.
Any ideas?
I once had problems
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:16 +0530:
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 00:38 +0530:
I wrote an mmap() interface for a USB device. But when I made a call to
it using mmap(), I
Il giorno Mar, 07-12-2004 alle 17:22 +0200, Erik Udo ha scritto:
The last time i checked, FreeSBIE GUI
was not to my taste.
-I rather use IceWM as my Window Manager, it is small and fast.
And still very usable. It's my only choise.
Users can now choose between Xfce 4.2-rc and Fluxbox. Look
Vladimir Terziev wrote:
Hi,
i need to implement gateway redundancy for our server farm. I found
UCARP ( http://www.ucarp.org ) as a potential solution, but it is written it is
tested successfully only on Linux, OpenBSD and NetBSD.
Did anybody have luck with it under FreeBSD ?
Hi hackers,
I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1] that
should be focused on security as well as features. Is there any chance
that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well? Considering GNU's
version security track record I think it could be a good move, and it
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 08:58:27PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
Hi hackers,
I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1] that
should be focused on security as well as features. Is there any chance
that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well? Considering GNU's
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:07:48PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes
any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another
implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like
SVN. No, I'm
Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 22:21 +0530:
There was a bug in my interface routine which probably resulted in too
many calls.
Something like *paddr=vtophys(base) instead of
*paddr=vtophys(base+offset) should result in lots of calls to the interface.
Just
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:19:19PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote..
Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 22:21 +0530:
There was a bug in my interface routine which probably resulted in too
many calls.
Something like *paddr=vtophys(base) instead of
At 8:58 PM +0100 12/7/04, Miguel Mendez wrote:
Hi hackers,
I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1]
that should be focused on security as well as features. Is there
any chance that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well?
[1] http://www.openbsd.org/opencvs/
From
i need to implement gateway redundancy for our server farm. I found
UCARP ( http://www.ucarp.org ) as a potential solution, but it is
written it is tested successfully only on Linux, OpenBSD and NetBSD.
Did anybody have luck with it under FreeBSD ?
I've just
Hello, Pawel Jakub Dawidek!
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:59:25PM +0100, you wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 07:27:51PM -0200, Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu?s wrote:
+ I finally got the system to boot with gmirror fully enabled. But I got
+ this during boot:
+
+
+ GEOM_MIRROR: Device vol0 created
Greetings,
Apologies in advance if this is better suited for another forum.
I have a mostly-stock 4.10-RELEASE system, save for GCC 3.3.5 and
binutils 2.15. After bootstrapping the GCC/binutils builds with stock
versions, I self-built the new GCC and binutils.
I can compile and link most
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:19:19PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote..
Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 22:21 +0530:
There was a bug in my interface routine which probably resulted in too
many calls.
Something like *paddr=vtophys(base) instead of
22 matches
Mail list logo