I wanted to get some clarification about the 4BSD scheduler. I am sort of
confused why there are two forms of scheduling, one done between processes and
another done between threads in a process. The priority calculations seem to be
done only with processes and I assume that the global run
Ashwin Chandra wrote:
I wanted to get some clarification about the 4BSD scheduler. I am sort of
confused why there are two forms of scheduling, one done between processes and
another done between threads in a process. The priority calculations seem to be
done only with processes and I assume that
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Ashwin Chandra wrote:
Hi all, Ive been trying to counter the malicious effects of a forkbomb
by setting the forkbomb parent and children to a PRI_MAX priority,
although this is not having any effect on the system load.
Basically in my code when I know which process is
On 1109549715 seconds since the Beginning of the UNIX epoch
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Well, I think that this is quite minor item, since GBDE doesn't govern
transformation of the passphrase into the actual key, so that another
scheme more bullet-prof against dictionary attacks (PKCS#5 or any other)
Dear All:
I have some questions of source of loader
1.Where is the source of the ls command?
2.How it mount the ufs boot partition as / when it start,Is it a function
or something else?.
Any answers are appreciated:)
_
MSN
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:56:03 -0800, Ashwin Chandra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The forkbomb program I wrote is just one parent that forks 750 or so
children that each malloc around 40 MB's of memory and do a mem traversal
through it. The children do not fork. I see the overhead of forking could
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005, Yan Yu wrote:
HI, all,
I have a Q on the input parameter of fdrop() and fdrop_locked() in
kern/kern_descrip.c.
i am curious about the design choice of their input parameter.
currently, it is defined as
A) fdrop( struct file
On 1109583001 seconds since the Beginning of the UNIX epoch
Mike Silbersack wrote:
If you're sure that the program is a forkbomb, why not modify the forkbomb
protection that is already present in kern_fork.c:
tsleep(forksleep, PUSER, fork, hz / 2);
What it does at present is whenever you try
I have this:
#include machine/clock.h
In program I use this:
DELAY(1000);
I get this:
undefined referance to 'DELAY'
when I compile the program with GCC with flags -Wall -g -o com main.c
ANY ideas ??
I have looked in the relevent header and it seems to be there
Regards,
Kat.
--
No virus found in
In the last episode (Feb 28), ?? ?? said:
I have some questions of source of loader
1. Where is the source of the ls command?
/sys/boot/common/ls.c
2. How it mount the ufs boot partition as / when it start,Is it a
function or something else?.
The loader can't mount anything, since it
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:39:52PM +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
I have this:
#include machine/clock.h
In program I use this:
DELAY(1000);
I get this:
undefined referance to 'DELAY'
when I compile the program with GCC with flags -Wall -g -o com main.c
ANY ideas ??
I have
In the last episode (Feb 28), Kathy Quinlan said:
I have this:
#include machine/clock.h
In program I use this:
DELAY(1000);
I get this:
undefined referance to 'DELAY'
when I compile the program with GCC with flags -Wall -g -o com main.c
DELAY is a kernel function. In user
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 28), Kathy Quinlan said:
I have this:
#include machine/clock.h
In program I use this:
DELAY(1000);
I get this:
undefined referance to 'DELAY'
when I compile the program with GCC with flags -Wall -g -o com main.c
DELAY is a kernel function. In user
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kathy Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I have this:
:
: #include machine/clock.h
:
: In program I use this:
:
: DELAY(1000);
:
: I get this:
:
: undefined referance to 'DELAY'
:
: when I compile the program with GCC with flags -Wall -g -o com
Hey.
I have a Freebsd server running freebsd-4.9-stable.
I cvsupped the ntop src last week for 3.1.1.
I then had no problems what so ever building ntop, except for the xml plugin
saying it was not built, cause it cannot find
xmlversion.h, even though I have libxml installed, and specified the
Hi, there!
I've tried s3switch utility from ports on 5.2.1 and found that
i386_set_ioperm syscall doesn't work properly. The next code illustrates
the problem. It will get SIGBUS with very high probability.
#include sys/types.h
#include machine/sysarch.h
#include machine/cpufunc.h
int main()
{
On Friday 25 February 2005 04:39 am, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Thu, 2005-Feb-24 17:59:19 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
- kernel option support. How do we support vendor modules in a kernel
that might be compiled with PAE (rather common these days), SMP, MAC,
etc. The loader and /boot infrastructure
On Monday 28 February 2005 02:57 pm, Denis Ustimenko wrote:
Hi, there!
I've tried s3switch utility from ports on 5.2.1 and found that
i386_set_ioperm syscall doesn't work properly. The next code illustrates
the problem. It will get SIGBUS with very high probability.
#include sys/types.h
On Monday 28 February 2005 00:15, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Roland Dowdeswell wrote:
[ cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED], because there has been talk
of GBDE there in the past.]
So what? If the write fails in the middle, reading sector will just
produce garbage. I don't think that it's different from
Hi, Everyone:
How can I debug the core dump file created by kernel panic? I try to use gdb
-core vmcore.0 (vmcore.0 is 4G file because I have 4G memory) and the gdb
said: this is not a vaild core file. Why?
Thanks
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Single line message.
On Tuesday, 1 March 2005 at 11:41:08 +0800, River wrote:
Hi, Everyone:
How can I debug the core dump file created by kernel panic? I try to
use gdb -core vmcore.0 (vmcore.0 is 4G file because I have 4G
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:41:08AM +0800, River wrote:
Hi, Everyone:
How can I debug the core dump file created by kernel panic? I try to
use gdb -core vmcore.0 (vmcore.0 is 4G file because I have 4G
memory) and the gdb said: this is not a vaild core file. Why?
Read the chapter on kernel
How can I debug the core dump file created by kernel panic? I try to use gdb
-core vmcore.0 (vmcore.0 is 4G file because I have 4G memory) and the gdb
said: this is not a vaild core file. Why?
AFAIK you have to use 'gdb -k' (or 'kgdb') to use GDB's kernel debugging mode.
--
FreeBSD
On 1109635700 seconds since the Beginning of the UNIX epoch
Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
I could be wrong but I would assume that if it is correctly handled within
softupdates there should be no need for journalling - e.g. If both
transactions are not completed the writes are ignored
This does
24 matches
Mail list logo
