On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 06:12:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(sorry for cross-posting, in the future this seems better suited for
emulation@
)
Hi;
I didn't see any interest for this on the website but perhaps we should be
working on improving our SVR4 emulation now that
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
Anyone have any insight into fixing gcc to make better
use of system memory on systems with more than 4 GB.
It appears that libiberty/physmem.c tries to use sysctl()
to determine the amount of physical memory in a system.
{ /*
From: Divacky Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
Anyone have any insight into fixing gcc to make better
use of system memory on systems with more than 4 GB.
It appears that libiberty/physmem.c tries to use sysctl()
to determine the amount of
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:05:48PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 08), Steve Kargl said:
Anyone have any insight into fixing gcc to make better use of system
memory on systems with more than 4 GB. It appears that
libiberty/physmem.c tries to use sysctl() to determine the
On 2005-12-09 14:02, Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Divacky Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
Anyone have any insight into fixing gcc to make better
use of system memory on systems with more than 4 GB.
It appears that
In the last episode (Dec 10), Giorgos Keramidas said:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
Anyone have any insight into fixing gcc to make better
use of system memory on systems with more than 4 GB.
It appears that libiberty/physmem.c tries to use sysctl()
to
6 matches
Mail list logo
