Hi,
I am facing problem in using sppp.
Both local system amd remote systems are using the sppp.
My questions are
1.Can we use sppp as PPP server?
2.If answer to first question is yes ,how can I do that?
I tried out the following commands.
$ifconfig hdlc0 up
hdlc0 is the PPP interace
hi hackers,
Are there anybody are interested in project Usable lock implementation with
SX-semantics(http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/#p-sxsemantics)?
Can we discuss it here? if so,share you ideas please.
or anywhere else ? please tell me,thanks.
--
Three passions, simple but
This may be pilot error, but for the life of me, I can't get
tcpdump2xplot to work as advertised.
Every lick of documentation I can find say to first create a netdump
libpcap file of TCP packets as such:
tcpdump -tt -S -w tcpdump.out tcp
Then, near as I can tell, I should be able to use
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:00:57AM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
This may be pilot error, but for the life of me, I can't get
tcpdump2xplot to work as advertised.
Every lick of documentation I can find say to first create a netdump
libpcap file of TCP packets as such:
I misenterpreted the
hi!
i have a probably dumb question, can't get through it..
i have some ips on my server (x.x.x.28 and x.x.x.204 is important)..
tried to forward packets from one ip to the other and ipfw doesn't do
anything.
i'd like to catch the packets on .204 port 80 and send them to one of my
vhosts
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:20:49AM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
Other docs say I have to do this:
tcpdump -tt -S -r tcpdump.out | tcpdump2xplot
But, I get the same error...
I've traced down the issue: tcpdump now creates lines like:
id IP to from ...
And tcpdump2xplot doesn't want
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 22:44 +0800, prime wrote:
hi hackers,
Are there anybody are interested in project Usable lock implementation with
SX-semantics(http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/#p-sxsemantics)?
Can we discuss it here? if so,share you ideas please.
or anywhere else ? please tell
In the last episode (Dec 13), Brian Reichert said:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:20:49AM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
Other docs say I have to do this:
tcpdump -tt -S -r tcpdump.out | tcpdump2xplot
But, I get the same error...
I've traced down the issue: tcpdump now creates lines
On Tue, 2005-Dec-13 18:27:43 +0100, OxY wrote:
i used this rule:
$cmd 00316 fwd x.x.x.x.204,80 tcp from any to x.x.x.28 80
what's wrong with it?
You don't mention what is happening or not happening (running tcpdump
and following packets as they go from system to system can be useful)
but there
Is there equivalent of POLLERR for kqueue()? Or is EV_EOF the only thing? I
would like to use kqueue/kevent for sockets but error condition signaling is
not clear to me from manpage.
Vaclav Haisman
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
both addresses are on the same box, just 2 public ips..
.28 is the jail, .204 is one of the hosts alias
- Original Message -
From: Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OxY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: ipfw
On 2005-12-13T11:20:49-0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:00:57AM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
This may be pilot error, but for the life of me, I can't get
tcpdump2xplot to work as advertised.
Every lick of documentation I can find say to first create a netdump
libpcap
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 01:36 pm, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
...
What do you think about using C-macros like a scripting language?
Honestly, I think I've now been scarred for life. :-/ I think that this stuff
would be so obscure that no one else would be able to help with
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:01:11PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
You'll probably get better results using the tcptrace port, which reads
capture files directly.
That it does; I was exploring what tcpdump2xplot _could_ provide,
as distinct from tcptrace, and ran in to the roadblock I originally
ran
hi,
the only use of COMPAT_43 (beside running 43 programs) is linux emulation layer
and some tty-related stuff. but GENERIC etc. still shouts KEEP THIS on this
option. is this necessary?
forcing COMPAT_43 pesimises performnce (additional locking in some places etc.)
and most users dont need it
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 20:48, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 01:36 pm, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
...
What do you think about using C-macros like a scripting language?
Honestly, I think I've now been scarred for life. :-/ I think that this
stuff would be so
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
Is there equivalent of POLLERR for kqueue()? Or is EV_EOF the only thing? I
would like to use kqueue/kevent for sockets but error condition signaling is
not clear to me from manpage.
Vaclav Haisman
Another unclear area for me is how do changes in
Vaclav Haisman wrote this message on Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:12 +0100:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
Is there equivalent of POLLERR for kqueue()? Or is EV_EOF the only thing?
I would like to use kqueue/kevent for sockets but error condition
signaling is not clear to me from
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 06:27:43PM +0100, OxY wrote:
hi!
i have a probably dumb question, can't get through it..
i have some ips on my server (x.x.x.28 and x.x.x.204 is important)..
tried to forward packets from one ip to the other and ipfw doesn't do
anything.
i'd like to catch the
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Josef Grosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: I have an IBM T22 thinkpad running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8. I have the
: CardBus devices in the current kernel. When I insert a CardBus device, A
: Xircom RealPort CardBus Ethernet I get a kernel panic like so;
:
20 matches
Mail list logo
