Re: automatic checking of source code

2006-04-08 Thread Eric Schuele
Divacky Roman wrote: hi I just found http://mygcc.free.fr/ which is a project for automatic checking of source code for bugs (memory leaks, unreleased locks, null pointer dereferences). I recall there was some SoC project to achieve something similar but this is complete and ready to run... it

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Scott Long
Ceri Davies wrote: On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 03:57:42PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:53:42PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: I'm trying to configure a bootable image to be used in various situations and on various (mostly unknown) hardware. For the filesystem I can use

Weight of an IRIS 4D/210GTX Box anyone ?

2006-04-08 Thread Kathy Quinlan
Hi all, I have been offered a IRIS 4D/210GTX SGI box, and I need to know the rough weight, thought as google did not turn up anything and SGI seem to disown all the old stuff these days, anyone got any idea on the weight of this ? Regards, Kat. -- No virus found in this outgoing message.

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Mike Meyer
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Well, the real question is why we force the details of driver names onto users. Network and storage drivers are especially guilty of this, but tty devices also are annoying. Because Unix has always made the hardware details available

Re: Weight of an IRIS 4D/210GTX Box anyone ?

2006-04-08 Thread Alain Hebert
Well, I have 7x4D/20 here (and about 12 working Indy, 6 for spare part (12 R5000), and a bunch of Indigo) The 4D/20 are about 70 pounds (~30 kilos) each. I dont know for the 210GTX but they looked similar. Anybody want a SGI? Free if you pay the shipping. Have fun.

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Scott Long
Mike Meyer wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Well, the real question is why we force the details of driver names onto users. Network and storage drivers are especially guilty of this, but tty devices also are annoying. Because Unix has always made the

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Mike Meyer
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Please trim the text you are repling to. You're argument here doesn't really make sense. Only because you're carrying it to ridiculous extremes and misinterpreting it. Youre' saying that instead of /dev/da0, we should have

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Mike Meyer wrote: If I do care - for instance, I want to distinguish between the ethernet interface that's on the internet and the one that's on my LAN, or I want root to be on the disk with the root file system on it - then this is a PITA, because every time I add hardware to the system, or

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Scott Long
Mike Meyer wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Please trim the text you are repling to. Please, I'm tired of arbitrary email etiquette. But where do you put the label on an ethernet interface? mike It sounds like your message is, don't be like Linux.

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Alain Hebert
...lazy... Not all problems can be fixed by somebody else. Work a little for a change. If you wish to name your interfaces switch to Windows. ifconfig -a | awk '/^[a-z0-9^]*:/ {i=$1} /inet / {ip=$2;net=$4;} /status/ {print i ip - net - $2}' em0: 10.0.1.1 - 0xff00 - active

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread David Taylor
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006, Mike Meyer wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Well, the real question is why we force the details of driver names onto users. Network and storage drivers are especially guilty of this, but tty devices also are annoying. Because Unix

Re: Weight of an IRIS 4D/210GTX Box anyone ?

2006-04-08 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Saturday, 8 April 2006 at 23:11:59 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote: Hi all, I have been offered a IRIS 4D/210GTX SGI box, and I need to know the rough weight, thought as google did not turn up anything and SGI seem to disown all the old stuff these days, anyone got any idea on the weight of

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Mike Meyer
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Mike Meyer wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Please trim the text you are repling to. Please, I'm tired of arbitrary email etiquette. If you think etiquette is arbitrary, you're sadly mistaken. But

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Mike Meyer
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: That doesn't quite work, though. Unless you require everyone wanting to distinguish between LAN and WAN interfaces uses different types of hardware for each card, they'll still end up with xl0 and xl1 (or whatever), which is in no

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:34:30AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:53:42PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: For the filesystem I can use geom_label and /dev/ufs/UnlikelyString, but I'd also like to have it try to configure whatever interfaces the machine happens to have via

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Scott Long
Ceri Davies wrote: On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:34:30AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:53:42PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: For the filesystem I can use geom_label and /dev/ufs/UnlikelyString, but I'd also like to have it try to configure whatever interfaces the machine

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Quality?

2006-04-08 Thread Robert Huff
Sam Leffler writes: OTOH we've done nothing with user application code and based on the work I've seen done by netbsd there's plenty of stuff to be fixed there. When you say user application code, is this an alias for ports or do you mean non-ported applications?

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Quality?

2006-04-08 Thread Scott Long
Robert Huff wrote: Sam Leffler writes: OTOH we've done nothing with user application code and based on the work I've seen done by netbsd there's plenty of stuff to be fixed there. When you say user application code, is this an alias for ports or do you mean non-ported

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever (solution?)

2006-04-08 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Mike Meyer wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: That doesn't quite work, though. Unless you require everyone wanting to distinguish between LAN and WAN interfaces uses different types of hardware for each card, they'll still end up with xl0 and xl1 (or whatever),

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Dima Dorfman
Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do I want for that? I identify ethernet boards by which slot on the back of the system I plug the cable into. Currently, I have to map that to board types to and which board is plugged into which slot to know which name to use. I want a name that tells

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Quality?

2006-04-08 Thread Robert Huff
Scott Long writes: When you say user application code, is this an alias for ports or do you mean non-ported applications? user application code == code not in src/sys/... That means src/lib, src/bin, src/sbin, src/usr.bin, etc. Got it. Thanks.

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Daniel Rock
Scott Long schrieb: Ceri Davies wrote: On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:34:30AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: Well, the real question is why we force the details of driver names onto users. Network and storage drivers are especially guilty of this, but tty devices also are annoying. How do you

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever

2006-04-08 Thread Mike Meyer
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: So I doubt that the overwriting of an Ingres database really happened in Solaris, like some other poster described - unless the administrator fiddled with /etc/path_to_inst by hand (you are free to shoot in your own foot). That

Re: Net::FTPSSL error

2006-04-08 Thread Ashok Shrestha
Adding freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org On 4/8/06, Ashok Shrestha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, System Info: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE bsdpan-Net-FTPSSL-0.04 p5-Net-SSLeay-1.30_1 perl-5.8.7 I'm trying to use Net::FTPSSL to connect to an FTP server via SSL. Here is the script:

Re: unable to SSH using Net::SSH::Perl

2006-04-08 Thread Ashok Shrestha
Adding freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org On 4/8/06, Ashok Shrestha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, System Info: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.30 perl-5.8.7 I'm trying to use Net::SSH::Perl to connect to an SSH server. Here is the script: #!/usr/bin/perl -w # test.pl

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever (solution?)

2006-04-08 Thread Mike Meyer
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Darren Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Mike Meyer wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: That doesn't quite work, though. Unless you require everyone wanting to distinguish between LAN and WAN interfaces uses different types of hardware

Re: Net::FTPSSL error

2006-04-08 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Apr 08), Ashok Shrestha said: Adding freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org On 4/8/06, Ashok Shrestha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to use Net::FTPSSL to connect to an FTP server via SSL. Here is the script: #!/usr/bin/perl -w use Net::FTPSSL; my $ftps =

Re: Using any network interface whatsoever (solution?)

2006-04-08 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Mike Meyer wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Darren Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: If you add something to /etc/rc.d so that a sh-ified version of this script runs after all interfaces have attached but before any numbering or cloning takes place you can have lines like this in /etc/rc.conf: