In the last episode (May 31), Zaphod Beeblebrox said:
> On 5/31/06, Eugene M. Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Dan Nelson wrote:
> >> Are you using the -C option to dump? I would expact that to help
> >> more in the "dumping directories" step, but it might help later
> >> phases too.
> >
> >Yep,
lish)
> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/index-ja.html (Japanese)
>
> Guys taking some panic troubles with p12, please try the p13 :)
> We think that p13 is getting be no-panic code quality.
Great work! There's a test iso available via torrent:
http://torrent.free
On 5/31/06, Eugene M. Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Nelson wrote:
> Are you using the -C option to dump? I would expact that to help more
> in the "dumping directories" step, but it might help later phases too.
Yep, -C32.
I'm a pretty big fan of using team (ports/misc/team). Team impl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO, and purely as constructive criticism, Jason's article would've been much
more interesting if he had tested ptmalloc (in the ports tree) and we had had
libumem.
Yes, that would have been nice, but when I tried to use ptmalloc, it
failed to work correctly. I don't
On 11/6/05, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, FreeBSD doesn't currently do what this decribes yet. It would be
possible
to do it by adding a new device_pause() method that drivers would be
required
to implement while the resources were shuffled around though and possibly
a
device_unp
On 6/1/06, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006, André Braga wrote:
[snip]
> I also have this feeling that ACLs also aren't respected inside
> jails or can be overwritten as easily as shown below
By "ACLs also aren't respected inside jails", do you mean, "ACLs don't wor
6 matches
Mail list logo