- Original Message -
From: Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lutz Boehne [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Aqcuiring full path to running process from outside
thekernel
So why not just change the compiler to put
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:36:40 +0200
Attilio Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
Mmm, I think that a better approach would be refering to different
MSRs tables for pentium, p6 and Pentium 4 (if I remind correctly they
are which show differences). It is more extensible, portable and
possibly
Reko Turja wrote:
But as said in earlier post of mine, I managed to achieve what I was
trying with the following code - using the sysctl seems to achieve
what was needed reliably enough, at least for now.
int mib[4];
size_t len;
mib[0] = CTL_KERN;
mib[1] = KERN_PROC;
mib[2] =
hi
I wonder what happens when proc A, create proc B using
fork1(td, RFMEM, 0, p2);
and either A or B mmap()s something. is the mmaped memory shared
among the procs? what if it brk()s something?
thnx
roman
--
www.liberalnistrana.cz
- Original Message -
From: Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: Aqcuiring full path to running process from outside the
?kernel
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Another way would be to use
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:59:07 -0500 (CDT)
Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
If we get back to the question of why we need the file,
we might not need it at all. As far as I understand,
the problem is that the Watcom compiler works by
sticking a set of messages into the executable
Is this file supposed to have a license at the top?
sys/fs/udf/osta.h
Eric
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
Hello,
Let me preface the email by saying I'm not overly familiar with geli, and
it may already have the ability to do what I'm about to describe.
The scenario: A FreeBSD based appliance at a customer premise. The
customer really can't be trusted not to disasemble the box, and gain
From: Jeff Palmer
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:17 PM
The idea: I'd like to use geli to encrypt *everything* on
the disk. So if someone (a competitor maybe) removes the
disk from the machine, he can't gain any data off of it
easily. I know nothing is 100%, but why make the
Divacky Roman wrote:
hi
I wonder what happens when proc A, create proc B using
fork1(td, RFMEM, 0, p2);
and either A or B mmap()s something. is the mmaped memory shared
among the procs? what if it brk()s something?
the virtual memory space is totally shared.
this is how linuxthreads
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Matteo Riondato wrote:
Just to have a try, I replaced /boot/beastie.4th with file a
containing only:
. Welcome to FreeSBIE
exit
then I deleted the line mentioning beastie-start from /boot/loader.rc
and rebooted my machine.
[...]
I think putting
Stefan Bethke [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 22.08.2006 21:22:31:
kenv(2) has smbios entries; they're available through getenv() and
getenv_type() in the kernel. See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/
cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/smbios.c for the history.
OK
I can get the System
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've finally found time to work on my L4::BSD project again, and I'm
getting back into the building of the kernel and it's various
friends alongside it for the new port (iguana, which is the
minimalistic L4 based OS that will help bridge the
I have a Soekris 4501 (and 4521) i'm attempting to get
set up with the Atheros mini-pci cards 168c:0012 (rev 01), ie:
ath_hal: 0.9.17.2 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413)
ath0: Atheros 5211 mem 0xa000-0xa000 irq 10 at device 16.0 on pci0
ath0: Ethernet
I am experimenting with modifying a kernel module and I need
to be able to open/read/write/close a file from within the
module. Is there a preferred way to do this? Are there any
locking or buffering issues that I need to be aware of?
sys/kern/kern_alq.c:alq_open() and
Jeff Palmer wrote:
Hello,
Let me preface the email by saying I'm not overly familiar with geli, and
it may already have the ability to do what I'm about to describe.
The scenario: A FreeBSD based appliance at a customer premise. The
customer really can't be trusted not to disasemble the
16 matches
Mail list logo