Hi,
Was __FreeBSD_version bumped when this change was introduced?
--HPS
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On 2/23/07, Greg Larkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm creating a standard FreeBSD 6.2 ISO image that I can use to
perform unattended installations into VMware Server virtual machines.
I'm using VMServer 1.0.1, and I've hit a roadblock when sysinstall
attempts to create the root
Quoting Hans Petter Selasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:03:42
+0100):
Was __FreeBSD_version bumped when this change was introduced?
Yes (700031). Not in the same commit, but shortly after it.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
BOFH excuse #151:
Some one needed the powerstrip, so they pulled the
hello
i have a first revision macbook pro (core duo 2ghz, not core 2 duo!)
i have sort of a problem here
freebsd 6.2 and 7.0 current (5 feb.) don't really boot correctly
i get:
AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed!
panic y/n? [y]
sometimes i get around this problem if i press the power button in
the exact
hello
i have a first revision macbook pro (core duo 2ghz, not core 2 duo!)
i have sort of a problem here
freebsd 6.2 and 7.0 current (5 feb.) don't really boot correctly
i get:
AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed!
panic y/n? [y]
sometimes i get around this problem if i press the power button in
the exact
On 2/23/07, Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/22/07, DAK GHATIKACHALAM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/21/07, Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/18/07, DAK GHATIKACHALAM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Freebsd
I have an issue with new card I need to make it work
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling FreeBSD
in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for performance
bottlenecks to be optimized.
We have recently made significant progress on optimizing for
On Saturday 24 February 2007 1:31 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling
FreeBSD in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for
performance bottlenecks to be optimized.
I wonder why these fraudulent scam artists/spammers abusing our freebsd
lists.
They are in wrong place with wrong people.
I am not buying your idea anyway. dude, you chose a wrong person.
Thanks
Dak
-- Forwarded message --
From: wale qazim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Feb 24,
On 2/24/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling FreeBSD
in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for performance
bottlenecks to be optimized.
We have
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree with
4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP scheduler for
scalability. It would be nice to see the comparison displayed to see what
the
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:47:55AM +, Coleman Kane wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it was
proclaimed:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:05:53AM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT
tree with
4BSD or ULE ? How do
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it was
proclaimed:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree with
4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP
On 2/24/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:47:55AM +, Coleman Kane wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it
was proclaimed:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance
Hello,
(sorry, don't know whether kernel problems should go to questions or
hackers, or both)..
This has been a long-standing problem of mine, but I always ignored
it hoping it would go away on its own with a future 6.x release, but
it remains...
No matter whether I boot into safe mode
16 matches
Mail list logo
