Re: mtx_unlock in kernel

On 3/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I want to use mtx_unlock for some threads, should I use mtx_lock() before? I admit, I don't understand your question, but anyway: man 9 mutex -- Pietro Cerutti - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments

Re: FreeBSD panics...

On Thursday 22 March 2007 20:58, Sławomir Babiński SYSINFO wrote: Can anyone look at this and sell any tips why my server panics? Wrong list. This should have been sent to -current or -net ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root# uname -a FreeBSD mercury.msi.pl 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #7: Wed Mar

Re: FreeBSD panics...

On 3/23/07, Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 22 March 2007 20:58, Sławomir Babiński SYSINFO wrote: Can anyone look at this and sell any tips why my server panics? Wrong list. This should have been sent to -current or -net ... or rather to -stable... FreeBSD mercury.msi.pl

Re: sendto() giving EPERM outside a jail

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am trying to port miniupnpd (http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/) and by in large it seems to work fine (evil idea as it is :) However it spews out a lot of.. miniupnpd[13010]: sendto(udp_notify): Operation not permitted According