On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:14:50PM +1000, Alan Garfield wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:44 +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Anyway, back to figuring out arp. UGH!
As a rule, an Ethernet driver needn't worry about ARP by itself
because ARP has own separate module in the network stack. Does
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 11:56 +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Apart from using fake MAC addresses, I don't think so.
I don't understand the concept of a fake MAC address, sorry.
The classic Ethernet is a broadcast medium by design, so a very
primitive NIC can just receive all traffic and let the
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:55:10AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
I stumbled on this in -current, but it's also true for 6.2.
/(root) is mounted diskless,
Quoting Tyrael [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:24:16 +0300):
Has anyone started working on porting 'prebind' from OpenBSD?
We are not aware of such work.
Has there been any discussion over this matter; as to how much work this
would require ?
I would be interested into looking
On Thursday 19 April 2007 11:57, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: That'd be a nice fall back but it surely it can't be too hard to reserve
: some memory for stuff like this?
I think that there is a way... We only need ~20k for this...
Is it perhaps that the loader puts the kernel low down in memory
At 04:47 PM 4/5/2007, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Using
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2007-March/022753.html
I have been able to get my GPRS card to be recognized in
FreeBSD. However, the IRQ it has picked, seems to conflict with the
irq of the cardbus causing an interrupt storm.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:14:13AM +1000, Murray Taylor wrote:
Server: IBM X3850 (88633SM)
CPU X 4: 40K2522
HDD X 6: 40K1051
IBM ServeRAID 8i: 39R8729
We are attempting to install FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE onto this machine and
are running into a problem getting the operating system to
Murray Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are attempting to install FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE onto this machine and
are running into a problem getting the operating system to recognise the
RAID controller. As a result not finding any disks when it comes to
installing the O/S.
We have attempted
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:24:16PM +0300, Tyrael wrote:
Has anyone started working on porting 'prebind' from OpenBSD?
Has there been any discussion over this matter; as to how much work this
would require ?
I would be interested into looking over this and see if i can implement it,
so any
If you can either install without ACPI, or remove two of the CPUs
during installation, this should be fairly easy to fix: change the
definition of NLAPICS in /usr/src/sys/{amd64,i386}/acpica/madt.c and
rebuild your kernel, then boot with ACPI enabled and report back to
us.
DES
Mark Tinguely [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suggested that in email too, but looking closer, I think the MAXCPU
needs to be increased because the cpu number uses the apic_id. Or could
that be changed with a logical CPU to APIC ID lookup?
Isn't the APIC IDs programmable? not that I am suggesting
Hello folks,
Does anyone know if FreeBSD 4.x or 5.x is affected by the Ipv6 mbuf
vulnerability
just like OpenBSD?
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=ContentModaction=itemid=1703
Thanks,
Subhash
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
Alan Garfield wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 11:56 +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Apart from using fake MAC addresses, I don't think so.
I don't understand the concept of a fake MAC address, sorry.
The classic Ethernet is a broadcast medium by design, so a very
primitive NIC can just receive all
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:17:19PM -0700, Subhash Gopinath wrote:
Hello folks,
Does anyone know if FreeBSD 4.x or 5.x is affected by the Ipv6 mbuf
vulnerability
just like OpenBSD?
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=ContentModaction=itemid=1703
As discussed on the security@
On 4/19/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know if FreeBSD 4.x or 5.x is affected by the Ipv6 mbuf
vulnerability
just like OpenBSD?
As discussed on the security@ list at the time, no.
Here is a mirror I found of the original thread:
I'm working on some custom hardware and I'm getting garbled console
output.
I noticed that siocntxwait looks like this:
static void
siocntxwait(iobase)
Port_t iobase;
{
int timo;
/*
* Wait for any pending transmission to finish. Required to avoid
I'm working on some custom hardware and I'm getting garbled console
output.
I noticed that siocntxwait looks like this:
static void
siocntxwait(iobase)
Port_t iobase;
{
int timo;
/*
* Wait for any pending transmission to finish. Required to avoid
*
Thanks Jerry,
We have determined that our problem is related to the
god-awful mess known as ACPI.
With a single processor installed, it all boots fine, including
finding PCI busses 1 and 2 and the raid on the aac driver is
peachy!
With 2 or more processors installed, and ACPI enabled, it
Thanks all,
We will look into the code editting and see what we can get
however we are on an very short time frame so may not be able to
slot it in before a maintenance slot where we need to be able to drop in
the box 'seamlessly' .
But I have noted the proposed fix provided on these lists
19 matches
Mail list logo
