HEADS UP: OpenSSL problems after GCC 4.2 upgrade

2007-05-20 Thread Alexander Kabaev
Hi all, there were several reports of OpenSSL being broken when compiled with GCC 4.2. It turns out OpenSSL uses function casting feature that was aggressively de-supported by GCC 4.2 and GCC goes as far as inserting invalid instructions ON PURPOSE to discourage the practice. Consequently,

testers wanted for PAPI / FreeBSD

2007-05-20 Thread Harald Servat
Hello, I'm porting PAPI to FreeBSD. I was wondering if you could give a try to the package I'm porting. It would be great to have more feedback than just that my laptop is able to provide me :) First of all, you can download the code at http://code.google.com/p/papi-for-freebsd Next, see

module for kernel

2007-05-20 Thread Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
Dear all, When you wanna write a module for linux kernel,you have 2 function: init_module() cleanup_module() But now i need to write a little module for FreeBSD kernel.Please guide me. --Mohsen ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: module for kernel

2007-05-20 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On Sun, 20 May 2007, 15:59+0330, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote: Dear all, When you wanna write a module for linux kernel,you have 2 function: init_module() cleanup_module() But now i need to write a little module for FreeBSD kernel.Please guide me. Check /usr/share/examples/kld/ . --

Re: module for kernel

2007-05-20 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Sunday 20 May 2007 14:36, Maxim Konovalov wrote: On Sun, 20 May 2007, 15:59+0330, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote: Dear all, When you wanna write a module for linux kernel,you have 2 function: init_module() cleanup_module() But now i need to write a little module for FreeBSD kernel.Please

Re: module for kernel

2007-05-20 Thread Nicolas Cormier
On 5/20/07, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, When you wanna write a module for linux kernel,you have 2 function: init_module() cleanup_module() But now i need to write a little module for FreeBSD kernel.Please guide me. --Mohsen

Re: HEADS UP: OpenSSL problems after GCC 4.2 upgrade

2007-05-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: there were several reports of OpenSSL being broken when compiled with GCC 4.2. It turns out OpenSSL uses function casting feature that was aggressively de-supported by GCC 4.2 and GCC goes as far as inserting invalid instructions ON PURPOSE to

Re: HEADS UP: OpenSSL problems after GCC 4.2 upgrade

2007-05-20 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:03:57PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: there were several reports of OpenSSL being broken when compiled with GCC 4.2. It turns out OpenSSL uses function casting feature that was aggressively de-supported by GCC 4.2 and

Re: HEADS UP: OpenSSL problems after GCC 4.2 upgrade

2007-05-20 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:03:57PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: there were several reports of OpenSSL being broken when compiled with GCC 4.2. It turns out OpenSSL uses function casting feature that was aggressively de-supported by GCC 4.2

kqueue implementation

2007-05-20 Thread Daniel Molina Wegener
Hello, I'm coding an application using the kqueue facility, but I see that I can't handle open and read events. Is planned to implement these handlings in the future?. Also, which facility can I use to handle these kind of events? Regards, -- .O. | Daniel Molina Wegener | C/C++ Developer

Re: SoC

2007-05-20 Thread Garrett Cooper
Garrett Cooper wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: Duane Whitty wrote: On Tuesday, 15 May 2007 at 1:05:07 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: Tom Evans wrote: On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 22:17 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: Ruby's nice, but it's built on Perl so I have suspicions on its overall usability /

More questions about BDB

2007-05-20 Thread Garrett Cooper
Ok, I've run into a strange issue with BDB's hash tables. Does anyone know what the following means? db_dump185: seq: Invalid argument Backstory: When dumping out a large amount of data it appears that there's an expected directive which isn't being inserted by Ruby's BDB1.85 facility into

Re: More questions about BDB

2007-05-20 Thread Sean Bryant
Garrett Cooper wrote: Ok, I've run into a strange issue with BDB's hash tables. Does anyone know what the following means? db_dump185: seq: Invalid argument Backstory: When dumping out a large amount of data it appears that there's an expected directive which isn't being inserted by Ruby's

Re: More questions about BDB

2007-05-20 Thread Garrett Cooper
Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (May 20), Sean Bryant said: Just a personal curiosity. Is there a particular reason why FreeBSD is holding on to BDB 1.85? All later versions have a non-BSD license (a source redistribution requirement was added), which means it can't go in the base

Re: More questions about BDB

2007-05-20 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 20), Sean Bryant said: Just a personal curiosity. Is there a particular reason why FreeBSD is holding on to BDB 1.85? All later versions have a non-BSD license (a source redistribution requirement was added), which means it can't go in the base system. BDB is built

Re: PAM exec patch to allow PAM_AUTHTOK to be exported.

2007-05-20 Thread Zane C.B.
On Mon, 21 May 2007 03:43:22 +0200 Dan Lukes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zane C.B. napsal/wrote, On 05/21/07 02:03: 3. want's to be PAM aware, but it's programmer is too lazy to write it the clean way (as regular pam module) - we need the patch The patch shall be rejected because the