On Friday 08 June 2007 09:17, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote:
Do you have INTR_FILTER in your kernel config file?
No.
Does the USB driver use interrupt filter or only ithread?
Ithread.
Interrupt filter is NULL I think.
#if (__FreeBSD_version = 700031)
err = bus_setup_intr(self,
The latest firewire driver I commited this week uses interrupt filter.
There might be some bad interaction between them if they share IRQ.
You can disable interrupt filter of firewire driver by changing
#define FWOHCI_INTFILT 0
in fwohcivar.h.
If you are using the latest firewire driver, can
Do you have INTR_FILTER in your kernel config file?
Does the USB driver use interrupt filter or only ithread?
On 6/8/07, Hans Petter Selasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I testing booting with a combo USB/Firewire carbus card, but no interrupts are
genereated. If I plug the card in when the
On Friday 08 June 2007 09:30, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote:
The latest firewire driver I commited this week uses interrupt filter.
There might be some bad interaction between them if they share IRQ.
You can disable interrupt filter of firewire driver by changing
#define FWOHCI_INTFILT 0
in
It seems that the firewire driver is unrelated to the problem.
Doesn't firewire device work too?
On 6/8/07, Hans Petter Selasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 June 2007 09:30, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote:
The latest firewire driver I commited this week uses interrupt filter.
There might
On Friday 08 June 2007 11:09, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote:
It seems that the firewire driver is unrelated to the problem.
Doesn't firewire device work too?
I haven't tested it. I don't have any FW devices.
--HPS
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
I testing booting with a combo USB/Firewire carbus card, but no interrupts
are
genereated. If I plug the card in when the computer is not cold, it works
fine. Any ideas? Does the cardbus driver generate a dummy interrupt to
make
sure that any outstanding interrupts are cleared?
how old is
On Friday 08 June 2007 11:43, Paolo Pisati wrote:
I testing booting with a combo USB/Firewire carbus card, but no
interrupts are
genereated. If I plug the card in when the computer is not cold, it works
fine. Any ideas? Does the cardbus driver generate a dummy interrupt to
make
sure
Is anybody working on running FreeBSD on the One Laptop Per Child
platform http://www.laptop.org? I'd be interested to try it, but I
wouldn't want to duplicate work. The only thing I've found with a web
search are some pictures of an OLPC at BSDCan
Am 08.06.2007 um 05:41 schrieb Greg 'groggy' Lehey:
How do I terminate the IP-IP tunnel at my end?
I'm using OpenVPN for similar porposes, albeit on lower latency DSL
links. OpenVPN can run over UDP or TCP, and can work through NAT,
and even with dynamic IPs.
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Diomidis Spinellis wrote:
Hi,
Is anybody working on running FreeBSD on the One Laptop Per Child platform
http://www.laptop.org? I'd be interested to try it, but I wouldn't want to
duplicate work. The only thing I've found with a web search are some
pictures of an OLPC
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 03:15 +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
On 6/7/07, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldn't help noticing that our gdb lags behind other BSDs. Is
there a technical reason for this? I'm thinking threading changes/gcc
changes (although I can't remember
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Friday 08 June 2007 11:43, Paolo Pisati wrote:
I testing booting with a combo USB/Firewire carbus card, but no
interrupts are
genereated. If I plug the card in when the computer is not cold, it works
fine. Any ideas? Does the cardbus driver generate a dummy
Anyone seen PLIP working on FreeBSD-6.2 release ?
I've tested my PLIP cable between 2 x 4.11 boxes. I'm trying to
install a laptop with 6.2 boot flops (with failed pcmcia/ether
recognition) I cant get that laptop a 6.2 tower to talk to each
other. Neither will those 2 x 6.2 talk to 4.11. I
Am 08.06.2007 um 17:47 schrieb Oliver Fromme:
While OpenVPN works well usually, it is generally not
advisable to run it over TCP, especially if your link
is not guaranteed to have 0% packet loss, which might
be the case for satellite links. Running OpenVPN over
UDP is fine.
Sure, but
Stefan Bethke wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
How do I terminate the IP-IP tunnel at my end?
I'm using OpenVPN for similar porposes, albeit on lower latency DSL
links. OpenVPN can run over UDP or TCP, and can work through NAT,
and even with dynamic IPs.
While OpenVPN works
I've used OpenVPN myself to tunnel official IP addresses
to my (dynamic) DSL link at home. You need to have a
server outside somewhere, of course, but that shouldn't
I find that vtun is a pretty reliable and less heavyweight solution for
this- I use it to get a tunnel to a secondary lab of
On 6/8/07, Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone seen PLIP working on FreeBSD-6.2 release ?
I've tested my PLIP cable between 2 x 4.11 boxes. I'm trying to
install a laptop with 6.2 boot flops (with failed pcmcia/ether
recognition) I cant get that laptop a 6.2 tower to talk to each
On 08.06.2007, at 20:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only problem here is that this isn't a solution for providing
routing for somebody else's Class C block.
Why?
inetnum: 192.109.197.0 - 192.109.197.255
netname: LEMIS-LAN
descr:LEMIS Lehey Microcomputer Systems
descr:
On 08.06.2007, at 20:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only problem here is that this isn't a solution for providing routing
for somebody else's Class C block.
Why?
inetnum: 192.109.197.0 - 192.109.197.255
netname: LEMIS-LAN
descr:LEMIS Lehey Microcomputer Systems
descr:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:10:10PM +, Allan Jude wrote:
I recreated it again, and the 'stopped at' in the kernel panic is:
userret+0x22 movq0(%rdi),%rbx
Ok so apparently userret was called with a bogus td arg, can you find
out from where? (there should be a return address on the
On 6/8/07, Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 03:15 +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
On 6/7/07, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldn't help noticing that our gdb lags behind other BSDs. Is
there a technical reason for this? I'm thinking threading
22 matches
Mail list logo
