On Friday 06 July 2007 01:35, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 05 July 2007 04:25:17 pm John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 05 July 2007 03:31:59 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 19:35, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Wed, Jul 04, 2007
Hi,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:27:49PM -0400, Ighighi Ighighi wrote:
The closefrom() call, available in Solaris, is present in NetBSD since
version 3.0.
It is implemented with the F_CLOSEM fcntl() available since version 2.0.
You could also add a system call like
* LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my implementation for FreeBSD. Some difference between my and
DragonFly's implementation:
- closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close all
open files (From my understanding of OpenSolaris's userland
implementation, this is
LI Xin delphij at delphij.net wrote:
Here is my implementation for FreeBSD. Some difference between my and
DragonFly's implementation:
- closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close all
open files (From my understanding of OpenSolaris's userland
implementation, this is
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:50:17PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
Solaris side-steps this issue by simply auditing the individual close()
system calls. My preference would be that we implement this in user space
also, which would likewise generate a series of audit events, one for each
system
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 06:18:14PM +0800, LI Xin wrote:
- closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close all
open files (From my understanding of OpenSolaris's userland
implementation, this is Solaris's behavior).
I think this is a bad idea as -1 is generally an invalid
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:27:49PM -0400, Ighighi Ighighi wrote:
It is implemented with the F_CLOSEM fcntl() available since version 2.0.
I don't like the fcntl(2) approach as it applies actions to more than
the passed in fd. That feels like an interface abuse.
Joerg
I'm currently running a gamut of tests (500 tests, per package --
128 total on my server), and outputting all data to CSV files to
interpret later, using another Perl script to interpret calculated
averages and standard deviations.
Excellent! Much-needed work.
Using basic printf(2)'s
Tim Kientzle wrote:
I'm currently running a gamut of tests (500 tests, per package --
128 total on my server), and outputting all data to CSV files to
interpret later, using another Perl script to interpret calculated
averages and standard deviations.
Excellent! Much-needed work.
-I tried ... buffering ... the +CONTENTS file parsing function, and the
majority of the time it yielded good results
One approach I prototyped sometime back was to use
libarchive in pkg_add as follows:
* Open the archive
* Read +CONTENTS directly into memory (it's
guaranteed to
Ed Schouten wrote:
* LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my implementation for FreeBSD. Some difference between my and
DragonFly's implementation:
- closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close all
open files (From my understanding of OpenSolaris's userland
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
Ed Schouten wrote:
* LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my implementation for FreeBSD. Some difference between my and
DragonFly's implementation:
- closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close all
open files (From my
Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
Ed Schouten wrote:
* LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my implementation for FreeBSD. Some difference between my
and DragonFly's implementation:
- closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close
all
Tim Kientzle said:
One approach I prototyped sometime back was to use
libarchive in pkg_add as follows:
* Open the archive
* Read +CONTENTS directly into memory (it's
guaranteed to always be first in the archive)
I can only concur with that. In my program
On Friday 06 July 2007 02:59:39 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Friday 06 July 2007 01:35, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 05 July 2007 04:25:17 pm John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 05 July 2007 03:31:59 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 19:35, John-Mark Gurney
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
Tim Kientzle said:
One approach I prototyped sometime back was to use
libarchive in pkg_add as follows:
* Open the archive
* Read +CONTENTS directly into memory (it's
guaranteed to always be first in the archive)
I can only concur with that. In
16 matches
Mail list logo
