On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:29:26AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Yes, I'll test them.
The problem is - the same kernel works when booted off a hard drive, so
unless the VMWare BIOS is very messed up (it's the first time I see such
problems) it may not help. Please, scatter debug printf's around
Victor Snezhko wrote:
Hi, Ivan, David,
Hi,
For about half a year I have another weirdness with time on my
-current box without vmware, maybe it's somehow has common origins
with your behaviour. When I boot FreeBSD, ntpdate (which is set up to
run via rc.conf) often reports huge time offsets:
I would like to export the various parameters from subr_param.c
into sysctl, these nodes would include the names from the following
tunables as well as others in these files.
TUNABLE_ULONG_FETCH(kern.maxtsiz, maxtsiz);
dfldsiz = DFLDSIZ;
TUNABLE_ULONG_FETCH(kern.dfldsiz,
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 01:26:00 pm Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I would like to export the various parameters from subr_param.c
into sysctl, these nodes would include the names from the following
tunables as well as others in these files.
TUNABLE_ULONG_FETCH(kern.maxtsiz, maxtsiz);
Here's a reference to the DragonFly code:
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/cvsweb/src/sys/cpu/i386/misc/in_cksum2.s
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/cvsweb/src/sys/netinet/in_cksum.c
It's pretty simple. The core 1's complement checksum is now written
in machine-dependant assembly and
We added it basically because doing all the junk described in
previous postings in this thread in userland is a ridiculously huge
eyesore that doesn't scale and doesn't make sense when 5 minutes of
programming nets you a shiny new system call which does it all for you.
If you
Matthew Dillon wrote:
We added it basically because doing all the junk described in
previous postings in this thread in userland is a ridiculously huge
eyesore that doesn't scale and doesn't make sense when 5 minutes of
programming nets you a shiny new system call which does it
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:53:02AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 11:46:14PM -0400, Ighighi wrote:
Calling F_MAXFD everytime we close a file descriptor would be heavy
having too much fd's.
On the other hand, it wouldn't make much a difference
8 matches
Mail list logo
