Alexander Motin wrote:
Julian Elischer пишет:
Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
While profiling netgraph operation on UP HEAD router I have found
that huge amount of time it spent on memory allocation/deallocation:
0.14 0.05 132119/545292 ip_forward [12]
0.14 0.05 133127/
Julian Elischer пишет:
Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
While profiling netgraph operation on UP HEAD router I have found that
huge amount of time it spent on memory allocation/deallocation:
0.14 0.05 132119/545292 ip_forward [12]
0.14 0.05 133127/545292 fxp_add_rfab
Kris Kennaway пишет:
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alexander Motin пишет:
While profiling netgraph operation on UP HEAD router I have found
that huge amount of time it spent on memory allocation/deallocation:
I have forgotten to tell that it was mostly GENERIC kernel just built
without INVARIANTS,
On 2008-02-01 02:00, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can keep 'importing' snapshots of the src tree from any arbitrary
> CVS branch, if you are willing to wait until CVS checks out the first
> copy of the snapshot.
>
> This is how we 'resync' with the official doc/ tree changes i
On 2008-01-31 21:37, Stefan Sperling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could not find any tool that does this properly among subversion,
> git, monotone and mercurial. That's not a big list, but I don't have
> time to try out version control systems all day. Also, proprietary
> VCS's were never consid
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alexander Motin пишет:
While profiling netgraph operation on UP HEAD router I have found that
huge amount of time it spent on memory allocation/deallocation:
I have forgotten to tell that it was mostly GENERIC kernel just built
without INVARIANTS, WITNESS and SMP but wi
Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
While profiling netgraph operation on UP HEAD router I have found that
huge amount of time it spent on memory allocation/deallocation:
0.14 0.05 132119/545292 ip_forward [12]
0.14 0.05 133127/545292 fxp_add_rfabuf [18]
0.27 0.
Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
While profiling netgraph operation on UP HEAD router I have found that
huge amount of time it spent on memory allocation/deallocation:
0.14 0.05 132119/545292 ip_forward [12]
0.14 0.05 133127/545292 fxp_add_rfabuf [18]
0.27 0.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:45:55AM +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to use
> as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what would
> you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off project track
Alexander Motin пишет:
While profiling netgraph operation on UP HEAD router I have found that
huge amount of time it spent on memory allocation/deallocation:
I have forgotten to tell that it was mostly GENERIC kernel just built
without INVARIANTS, WITNESS and SMP but with 'profile 2'.
--
Ale
Hi.
While profiling netgraph operation on UP HEAD router I have found that
huge amount of time it spent on memory allocation/deallocation:
0.14 0.05 132119/545292 ip_forward [12]
0.14 0.05 133127/545292 fxp_add_rfabuf [18]
0.27 0.10 266236/545292 n
At 8:45 AM +0200 1/31/08, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Hi,
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what
to use as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings,
what would you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off
project tracking FreeBSD as base that
At 21:39 20/01/2008, you wrote:
Hello
I am trying to hack in some symlink support into the [sys/boot/i386/]boot2
bootloader (for my project [1]) and I seem to fall short of about 69 bytes:
as -o boot2.o boot2.s
ld -static -N --gc-sections -nostdlib -Ttext 0x2000 -o
boot2.out/build/obj/build
OutBackDingo wrote:
I'm having to use mercurial.
I'm not really enjoying it.
works ok for small projects. BSD is a bit big for it.
doe work foe offline editing, but loses all your BSD history.
probably SVK is the way to go from what I hear.
Im using mercurial on full FreeBSD trees, curiosity m
Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 17:50:20 schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
> "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Currently, you're basically required to do a getsockname to a struct
> > sockaddr_storage and typecast that to the actual socket addres type
> > based on the ss_family mem
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:02 -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:45:55 +0200 "Adrian Penisoara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> Subversion is a close second, but is still a little rough
> around the edges. Most notably, merge tracking is in the 1.5 beta
> builds, but not in the pr
On Thursday 31 January 2008 10:20:42 am Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 January 2008 06:09:21 pm Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> >> Hi hackers,
> >>
> >> I think that i) sys/devicestat.h should include sys/resource.h or ii)
> >> the man page of devstat(9) should mention that
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
>> I think this might be best:
>>
>> Index: devstat.h
>> ===
>> RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/lib/libdevstat/devstat.h,v
>> retrieving revision 1.11
>> diff -u -r1.11 devstat.h
>> --- devstat.h 22
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:45:55 +0200 "Adrian Penisoara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to use
> as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what would
> you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off project
"Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently, you're basically required to do a getsockname to a struct
> sockaddr_storage and typecast that to the actual socket addres type
> based on the ss_family member (to be able to pass it to one of the
> *_ntop-functions, for example), bu
Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 16:31:32 schrieben Sie:
> "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm currently in the need to get the protocol family that was used to
> > create a socket (and passed via a unix domain socket to another
> > program), and I've not really come up with
"Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm currently in the need to get the protocol family that was used to
> create a socket (and passed via a unix domain socket to another
> program), and I've not really come up with a proper scheme other than
> to use getsockname and retrieve sa
"Adrian Penisoara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to use
> as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what would
> you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off project tracking
> FreeBSD as base that wou
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 January 2008 06:09:21 pm Pietro Cerutti wrote:
>> Hi hackers,
>>
>> I think that i) sys/devicestat.h should include sys/resource.h or ii)
>> the man page of devstat(9) should mention that the user himself is
>> supposed to include sys/resource.h.
>>
>> Without:
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 06:09:21 pm Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> I think that i) sys/devicestat.h should include sys/resource.h or ii)
> the man page of devstat(9) should mention that the user himself is
> supposed to include sys/resource.h.
>
> Without:
>
> > cat devstat.c
> #in
I've only tried CVS, Mericurial, Clearcase and a bit of Subversion.
And if you don't need IDE integration Mercurial seems to be working
pretty good.
I just read an article about the new merging and branching support
coming in Subversion 1.5 and it looks like it might have some future.
The IDE suppo
> I'm having to use mercurial.
> I'm not really enjoying it.
> works ok for small projects. BSD is a bit big for it.
> doe work foe offline editing, but loses all your BSD history.
>
> probably SVK is the way to go from what I hear.
Im using mercurial on full FreeBSD trees, curiosity makes me as
Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 10:03:22 schrieb Julian Elischer:
> I'm having to use mercurial.
> I'm not really enjoying it.
> works ok for small projects. BSD is a bit big for it.
> doe work foe offline editing, but loses all your BSD history.
We're using mercurial pretty much for all of our (10
Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
Hey all!
I'm currently in the need to get the protocol family that was used to create a
socket (and passed via a unix domain socket to another program), and I've not
really come up with a proper scheme other than to use getsockname and
retrieve sa_family from the
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Hi,
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to use
as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what would
you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a
Hey all!
I'm currently in the need to get the protocol family that was used to create a
socket (and passed via a unix domain socket to another program), and I've not
really come up with a proper scheme other than to use getsockname and
retrieve sa_family from the resulting socket (which current
31 matches
Mail list logo
