On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Alexander Motin wrote:
As I can see so_upcall() callback is called with SOCKBUF_MTX unlocked. It
means that SB_UPCALL flag can be removed during call and socket can be
closed and deallocated with soclose() while callback is running. Am I right
or I have missed something?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm currently working again on the Synaptics Touchpad support[1] in psm(4).
The enable_synaptics() probe function adds a subtree to hw.psm; I
didn't changed its behaviour for now. This subtree is created only if:
o
I'm working on FreeBSD 6.2 and I'm wondering if anybody can help with an
issue I've found using fork and threads. The attached program
demonstrates the problem. In short, if a process creates a thread, joins
the thread, then forks a child process which creates a thread, the
child's attempt to
Jeremy Chadwick escreveu:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 11:28:39PM -0300, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I want to make versioned symbols as they work in Linux, but I had no
success with FreeBSD.
This seems quite relevant, specific to RELENG_7. (Said feature isn't
available in earlier
Tom Evans writes:
Yup. The proof will be in the pudding, as they say.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating, actually. There's no proof
actually in the pudding.
/pedant
Add some brandy, or maybe rum :-)
Makes the coding more fun. Maybe not faster or
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 09:45:15PM -0600, Marko, Shaun wrote:
In short, if a process creates a thread, joins
the thread, then forks a child process which creates a thread, the
child's attempt to create a thread will cause the program to dump core
with the following error message.
fork and
On Friday 07 March 2008 05:11:17 am Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently working again on the Synaptics Touchpad support[1] in psm(4).
The enable_synaptics() probe function adds a subtree to hw.psm; I
didn't changed its behaviour for now. This subtree is created only if:
o
On Thursday 06 March 2008 10:45:15 pm Marko, Shaun wrote:
I'm working on FreeBSD 6.2 and I'm wondering if anybody can help with an
issue I've found using fork and threads. The attached program
demonstrates the problem. In short, if a process creates a thread, joins
the thread, then forks a
Hi,
After having to deploy an Oracle Database XE [1] installation (with Linux
32bit binaries from the official RPM package) on a production FreeBSD
6.2machine I realized it would be very much feasible to produce a
FreeBSD
port/package for it.
I would like to know whether similar efforts have
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:36:56PM +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
After having to deploy an Oracle Database XE [1] installation (with Linux
32bit binaries from the official RPM package) on a production FreeBSD
6.2machine I realized it would be very much feasible to produce a
FreeBSD
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 12:13:04AM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greetings,
Ilias Marinos wrote:
Hello all,
I have a jail to my FreeBSD-STABLE, in which I run some
uname -a will be more helpful then FreeBSD-STABLE.
services.I have configured and setup this jail using
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Marko, Shaun wrote:
I'm working on FreeBSD 6.2 and I'm wondering if anybody can help with an
issue I've found using fork and threads. The attached program
demonstrates the problem. In short, if a process creates a thread, joins
the thread, then forks a child process which
I see an unusual symptom with one of our in-house applications. The
main I/O loop calls kevent(), which in turn returns two events with
EV_EOF error set, always for the same descriptors (they're both socket
descriptors). As the man page is not pretty clear about it and I don't
have my UNP copy
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:14:15 +0100
Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Adrian Penisoara [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Fri, 7 Mar 2008
16:36:56 +0200):
Hi,
After having to deploy an Oracle Database XE [1] installation
(with Linux 32bit binaries from the official RPM
Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Alexander Motin wrote:
As I can see so_upcall() callback is called with SOCKBUF_MTX unlocked.
It means that SB_UPCALL flag can be removed during call and socket can
be closed and deallocated with soclose() while callback is running. Am
I right or I
Seems if you have package X which depends on package Y which
depends on package Z then pkg_add -r X will always fail unless
you first :-
1. pkg_add -r Y
2. pkg_add -r Z
The failure will be:-
pkg_add: could not find package Z !
This happens even though Z exists in the remote source package
Vlad GALU wrote:
I see an unusual symptom with one of our in-house applications. The
main I/O loop calls kevent(), which in turn returns two events with
EV_EOF error set, always for the same descriptors (they're both socket
descriptors). As the man page is not pretty clear about it and I
On 3/7/08, Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad GALU wrote:
I see an unusual symptom with one of our in-house applications. The
main I/O loop calls kevent(), which in turn returns two events with
EV_EOF error set, always for the same descriptors (they're both socket
Vlad GALU wrote:
On 3/7/08, Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad GALU wrote:
I see an unusual symptom with one of our in-house applications. The
main I/O loop calls kevent(), which in turn returns two events with
EV_EOF error set, always for the same descriptors (they're both
On 3/7/08, Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad GALU wrote:
On 3/7/08, Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad GALU wrote:
I see an unusual symptom with one of our in-house applications. The
main I/O loop calls kevent(), which in turn returns two events with
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Vlad GALU wrote:
I see an unusual symptom with one of our in-house applications. The main I/O
loop calls kevent(), which in turn returns two events with EV_EOF error set,
always for the same descriptors (they're both socket descriptors). As the
man page is not pretty clear
Quoting Adrian Penisoara [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Fri, 7 Mar 2008
16:36:56 +0200):
Hi,
After having to deploy an Oracle Database XE [1] installation (with Linux
32bit binaries from the official RPM package) on a production FreeBSD
6.2machine I realized it would be very much feasible to
I am defnitely interested in helping in this area if needed. A couple
of years ago, I struggled mightily trying to get Oracle running on 5.1
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Rink Springer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:36:56PM +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Steven Hartland wrote:
Seems if you have package X which depends on package Y which
depends on package Z then pkg_add -r X will always fail unless
you first :-
1. pkg_add -r Y
2. pkg_add -r Z
The failure will be:-
pkg_add: could not find package Z !
This happens even though Z exists in the
- Original Message -
From: walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are using RELENG_7, pkg_add is looking in the wrong place
on the remote server for packages. I just submitted a patch on
the -STABLE list for this problem.
I'm actually using PACKAGESITE which is meant to bypass all path
[originally posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
recently I've tried a few benchmarks around pipe throughput on Linux vs.
FreeBSD.
Everyone interesting can see my stuff at http://213.148.29.37/PipeBench, and
initial post to Linux kernel developers mailing list at
26 matches
Mail list logo
